Re: CSA and SQA problem

2011-08-26 Thread Richard L Peurifoy
On 8/25/2011 1:21 PM, Staller, Allan wrote: The manual previously cited does not state either case (pro or con) clearly under the discussion of the INITSQA parameter. My understanding was that this parameter was used to increase the initial allocation until the SQA parameters of IEASYSxx were

Re: CSA and SQA problem

2011-08-26 Thread Staller, Allan
Thank you for the update. I learned something new today. snip On 8/25/2011 1:21 PM, Staller, Allan wrote: The manual previously cited does not state either case (pro or con) clearly under the discussion of the INITSQA parameter. My understanding was that this parameter was used to increase

CSA and SQA problem

2011-08-25 Thread Carlos Bodra - Pessoal
Hello We have an z/os 1.8 running under a lpar in a z890. Now we have a chance to move it to a z10 BC machine, but during IPL we are getting iea304w wait 80009064. We already tried a lot of combinations of CSA, ECSA, SQA and ESQA values and we continue to getting waits during IPL. Since z/OS

Re: CSA and SQA problem

2011-08-25 Thread Richard L Peurifoy
On 8/25/2011 11:54 AM, Carlos Bodra - Pessoal wrote: Hello We have an z/os 1.8 running under a lpar in a z890. Now we have a chance to move it to a z10 BC machine, but during IPL we are getting iea304w wait 80009064. We already tried a lot of combinations of CSA, ECSA, SQA and ESQA values and

Re: CSA and SQA problem

2011-08-25 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:53:00 -0300 Carlos Bodra - Pessoal cbo...@terra.com.br wrote: :We have an z/os 1.8 running under a lpar in a z890. Now we have a chance :to move it to a z10 BC machine, but :during IPL we are getting iea304w wait 80009064. :We already tried a lot of combinations of CSA,

Re: CSA and SQA problem

2011-08-25 Thread Starr, Alan
@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Carlos Bodra - Pessoal Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 9:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: CSA and SQA problem Hello We have an z/os 1.8 running under a lpar in a z890. Now we have a chance to move it to a z10 BC machine, but during IPL we are getting iea304w wait

Re: CSA and SQA problem

2011-08-25 Thread Staller, Allan
The wait state code indicates a program check. Was z/OS 1.8 *ever* supported on z/10? That is one possibility required HW/SW not available. Has all applicable maintenance been applied? Search IBM link for 2098DEVICE and research/install the indicated maintenance. This might be due to missing

Re: CSA and SQA problem

2011-08-25 Thread Campbell Jay
@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Starr, Alan Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 1:11 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: CSA and SQA problem Carlos, This error is occurring early in the NIP process. Richard's suggestion is certainly worth a shot. What module name is specified in the message text

Re: CSA and SQA problem

2011-08-25 Thread Bob Shannon
Was z/OS 1.8 *ever* supported on z/10? Yes. 1.8 is also supported on a z196. Bob Shannon Rocket Software -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message:

Re: CSA and SQA problem

2011-08-25 Thread R.S.
W dniu 2011-08-25 19:20, Staller, Allan pisze: The wait state code indicates a program check. Was z/OS 1.8 *ever* supported on z/10? Yes, it was. As well as 1.7. Of course some PTFs are required. I also would start from checking service level and 2098DEVICE. -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland

Re: CSA and SQA problem

2011-08-25 Thread Richard L Peurifoy
On 8/25/2011 12:22 PM, Staller, Allan wrote: The wait state code indicates a program check. Was z/OS 1.8 *ever* supported on z/10? That is one possibility required HW/SW not available. Has all applicable maintenance been applied? Search IBM link for 2098DEVICE and research/install the

Re: CSA and SQA problem

2011-08-25 Thread Staller, Allan
The manual previously cited does not state either case (pro or con) clearly under the discussion of the INITSQA parameter. My understanding was that this parameter was used to increase the initial allocation until the SQA parameters of IEASYSxx were processed. At that time the allocation would be