Cheryl,
>I am trying to send you an off-list email, but it's returned saying that you
>won't accept email from my address. Have I done something wrong?
no, you didn't do anything wrong. This email address blacklists just about
everyone, with one or two on a whitelist.
I had sent you an email f
Barbara,
I am trying to send you an off-list email, but it's returned saying that you
won't accept email from my address. Have I done something wrong?
Thanks,
Cheryl
che...@watsonwalker.com
==
Cheryl Watson
Watson & Walker, Inc.
www.watsonwalker.com
941-266-6609
==
On 11/2/2010 5:33 PM, Richard L Peurifoy wrote:
It appears I had my results backwards in my test.
PMO didn't like LCCA/PCCA above the line.
SCHDMUF didn't like VSM USEZOSV1R9RULES(NO).
There is a fix for PMO. As soon as it is on I will try again.
CA fix RO20128 has been applied for the PMO pr
In , on 11/01/2010
at 07:35 AM, Barbara Nitz said:
>Which is why it is so easy for vendors (like Beta Systems) to refuse
>to fix things uncovered by those traps.
Think of it as an opportunity rather than a problem. Is your
management pressing you to reduce software costs? If so, look first a
It appears I had my results backwards in my test.
PMO didn't like LCCA/PCCA above the line.
SCHDMUF didn't like VSM USEZOSV1R9RULES(NO).
There is a fix for PMO. As soon as it is on I will try again.
--
Richard
--
For IBM-MAIN
"Mark Zelden" wrote in message
news:...
> On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 07:52:03 -0400, Peter Relson
wrote:
>
> >
> >Perhaps the IBM-Main community can help come up with a way to
document
> >"things to play with" which would likely go with "but do not waste
level
> >2's time for things that you find when p
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 07:52:03 -0400, Peter Relson wrote:
>
>Perhaps the IBM-Main community can help come up with a way to document
>"things to play with" which would likely go with "but do not waste level
>2's time for things that you find when playing". These play items are
>typically for looking
The DIAG traps mentioned by Barbara N are not intended for general use.
That is why they are not documented.
To be frank: as with anything that you "find", you may try them, but aside
from problems due to IgvInitGetmain, you should not expect changes in
IBM code for situations (not necessari
>We IPLed our testsystems with the traps on this morning and had some
>great fireworks (TSS)!
>
>Just to be sure: do the traps only pollute storage that is not
>documented to be set to zeros? In other words, do they leave storage
>unmodified that is documented to be returned initialized to zeros?
"Barbara Nitz" wrote in message
news:...
> >Yes, this is the JCL I found, but this only targets some PSA areas
and
> >not with x'FF' and x'4F' as you said.
> The FF and 4F come from the DIAG traps. And I think I copied the JCL
from
> share presentation 'bit bucket 29'. And believe me, when I saw
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Barbara Nitz wrote:
>>Yes, this is the JCL I found, but this only targets some PSA areas and
>>not with x'FF' and x'4F' as you said.
> The FF and 4F come from the DIAG traps. And I think I copied the JCL from
> share presentation 'bit bucket 29'. And believe me, whe
On 11/1/2010 1:45 AM, Barbara Nitz wrote:
Yes, CA are certainly BIG offenders in this game. Actually, we just ran into a
key8 CSA thing with datacom - you cannot change the XCF MUF group name
without it. Even after IPL they do not come up.
We've had pretty good luck getting CA to correct these
"Bob Shannon" wrote in message
news:<58fc7f986fcb804286e23b59decf420f088a3...@nwt-s-mbx2.rocketsoftware
.com>...
> > Of course they're not documented
>
> But they are listed in SYS1.MODGEN(IGVDGNB).
>
> Bob Shannon
Like George Orwell's pigs already said: all traps are undocumented, but
some
"Barbara Nitz" wrote in message
news:...
> >Yes, this is the JCL I found, but this only targets some PSA areas
and
> >not with x'FF' and x'4F' as you said.
> The FF and 4F come from the DIAG traps. And I think I copied the JCL
from
> share presentation 'bit bucket 29'. And believe me, when I saw
> Of course they're not documented
But they are listed in SYS1.MODGEN(IGVDGNB).
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the messa
>Yes, this is the JCL I found, but this only targets some PSA areas and
>not with x'FF' and x'4F' as you said.
The FF and 4F come from the DIAG traps. And I think I copied the JCL from
share presentation 'bit bucket 29'. And believe me, when I saw a PSA
>Furthermore, the mentioned traps are not
"Barbara Nitz" wrote in message
news:...
> >Thanks for the tip. However, I can't find any igvdgnpp proc. With
Google
> >I found an older version (for PSA traps), but I don't think this is
the
> >one you intend.
> >Where did you find the JCL or can you show yours?
>
> Yes, the PSA one is the one.
>Thanks for the tip. However, I can't find any igvdgnpp proc. With Google
>I found an older version (for PSA traps), but I don't think this is the
>one you intend.
>Where did you find the JCL or can you show yours?
Yes, the PSA one is the one. I don't remember where I originally copied it
from,
"Barbara Nitz" wrote in message
news:...
> >Are there still problems known or is it generally considered safe to
go
> >to VSM USEZOSV1R9RULES(NO)? We run 1.10, going to 1.11 soon.
> IPL your test system / sysplex with these options in your diag:
> Traps Name(
>Are there still problems known or is it generally considered safe to go
>to VSM USEZOSV1R9RULES(NO)? We run 1.10, going to 1.11 soon.
IPL your test system / sysplex with these options in your diag:
Traps Name(
IeaInitArSrb
20 matches
Mail list logo
