We've always allocated our SMF files as follows:
DEFINE CLUSTER( -
CONTROLINTERVALSIZE(26624) -
TRACKS(6300) -
NAME(SYS1.MAN2) -
NONINDEXED -
RECORDSIZE(26614,32767) -
REUSE -
SHAREOPTIONS(2) -
SPANNED -
SPEED -
VOLUME(SYS004) )
I'm just curious since I
))
-Original Message-
From: George Dranes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 9:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SYS1.MAN allocation question
We've always allocated our SMF files as follows:
DEFINE CLUSTER( -
CONTROLINTERVALSIZE
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:25:46 -0600, George Dranes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've always allocated our SMF files as follows:
DEFINE CLUSTER( -
CONTROLINTERVALSIZE(26624) -
TRACKS(6300) -
NAME(SYS1.MAN2) -
NONINDEXED -
RECORDSIZE(26614,32767) -
REUSE -
SHAREOPTIONS(2)
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:25:46 -0600, George Dranes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've always allocated our SMF files as follows:
DEFINE CLUSTER( -
CONTROLINTERVALSIZE(26624) -
TRACKS(6300) -
NAME(SYS1.MAN2) -
NONINDEXED -
RECORDSIZE(26614,32767) -
REUSE -
SHAREOPTIONS(2) -
There's been some disagreement over the specification of CISIZE for the SMF
datasets. A CISIZE of 26624 gives you 52K per track on a 3390 (2 CIs) ...
slightly better performance. A CISIZE of 18432 will give you 54K per track
on a 3390 (3 CIs) ... sightly better space utilization. Make your
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:39:58 +, john gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
recommendation and your own CONTROLINTERVALSIZE(26624) value, I would change
RECORDSIZE(26614,32767)
which may be an old typo, to
RECORDSIZE(26624,32767)
Not a typo today, but I'm not enough of a VSAM
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:39:58 +, john gilmore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
recommendation and your own CONTROLINTERVALSIZE(26624) value, I would
change
RECORDSIZE(26614,32767)
which may be an old typo, to
RECORDSIZE(26624,32767)
Not a typo today, but
?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 11:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYS1.MAN allocation question
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:39:58 +, john gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Can I change the bufferspace value to each MAN file
individually or is this one of those changes that
require all MAN files be redefined?
You may try to run IDCAMS:
ALTER SYS1.MAN1.D BUFSP(110592)
ALTER SYS1.MAN3.D BUFSP(110592)
ALTER SYS1.MAN4.D BUFSP(110592)
ALTER SYS1.MAN5.D
9 matches
Mail list logo