>Awful product to get working with OMVS and RACF. And their support teams
>(in this part of the world anyway) don't even appear to understand the
>environment.
Well, I am still at SAS8, so far I have avoided that unpleasantness completely.
ITRM up to version 2.6 could be ordered independently and
In a message dated 4/14/2008 7:50:46 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Awful product to get working with OMVS and RACF. And their support teams
(in this part of the world anyway) don't even appear to understand the
environment.
>>
It's just the SAS branding of MXG. If y
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 08:27 -0400, Carroll, William wrote:
> My management is interested in this product. I was wondering, how many
> People are using it, and what are there thoughts.Thank You.
I wouldn't even consider installing it on the the mainframe again (not
that I get any input to th
My management is interested in this product. I was wondering, how many
People are using it, and what are there thoughts.Thank You.
Bill Carroll
EMAIL DISCLAIMER:
The information contained in this message may be
privileged or confidential and is protected from disclosure.
If the reader o
NB: This email and its contents are subject to our email legal notice
which can be viewed at http://www.sars.gov.za/Email_Disclaimer.pdf
Hi
We have been using SAS/ITRM for many years on the mainframe and other
platforms (porting the non-mainframe data to OMVS) with great success. A
couple
A few years back I inherited SAS (and ITRM) and MXG and have to make do with
what was setup. The sales people are here regularly, as we still have a z/OS
licence, and I am severely opposed to running this on a micky mouse system,
especially as all data we workk with are on the host.
-
And due to
> Posted by David Kopischke
>
> Greetings,
>Preface: I am not a performance analyst. I have no idea what these
> products do, hence my question.
>
>Our capacity analysis team is looking at SAS ITRM 3.1
functionality.
> In breezing through the synopsis:
>
>
>I've already dropped SAS from z/OS due to cost.
We managed to get quite a deal for SAS on the mainframe.
Ever since January 2006, when they announced sub-capacity pricing.
And, you don't have to run any reports.
A $100K licence dropped to $36K in the first year and $20K every year after.
-
Too b
Shane wrote:
>Ooooh, I doubt my opinion of the ITRM packaging is fit for public
consumption.
I'm with you, mate.
Quote from the doc:
"SAS IT Resource Management ensures delivery of IT services and resources in
an efficient and cost-effective manner while demonstrating measurable value
to busine
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 12:59 -0600, Kopischke, David G. wrote:
>Our capacity analysis team is looking at SAS ITRM 3.1 functionality.
> What's your opinion ???
Ooooh, I doubt my opinion of the ITRM packaging is fit for public
consumption.
Short answer (IMHO), *don't* install
Greetings,
Preface: I am not a performance analyst. I have no idea what these
products do, hence my question.
Our capacity analysis team is looking at SAS ITRM 3.1 functionality.
In breezing through the synopsis:
http://www.sas.com/solutions/itresource/fact.pdf
this reads like extensions
11 matches
Mail list logo
