Might I request the luminaries of the list perhaps indulge those of us
unfortunate enough to be using the (severely crippled) web interface and *top
post* in replies ?.
That way we may get the gist of the response from mouse over without having
to select every post.
Yes, that is how bad things
Without laying claim to being one of the luminaries of the list, I
shall try to comply with this eminently reasonable request.
Is someone also addressing the web interface's apparently multiple
structural problems? If not, they will certainly worsen.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
On
While there is an RFC (I'm not going to hunt for the number on a Sunday)
that specifies that bottom posting is correct, as a reader I find
bottom posting to be hugely counterproductive. When reading a thread in
order, bottom posting requires the reader to scroll past what has
already been
Uriel,
z/OS is a great environment, it is a pity that your z/OS system has been
stabilized.
FWIW, Co:Z is offered under two licensing models:
1) the free Community License
2) an enterprise license and support agreement
See: http://dovetail.com/support.html
Several of the largest financial
Gord
According to the Wikipedia article on the topic, [1] the great benefit of
bottom posting is to present a chronological story. But in what sort of
environment? This makes sense when an e-mail sequence is being developed and -
crucially - the e-mail sequence is copied to folk who were not
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 11:32:19 -0400, Gord Tomlin wrote:
While there is an RFC (I'm not going to hunt for the number on a Sunday)
that specifies that bottom posting is correct, as a reader I find
bottom posting to be hugely counterproductive. When reading a thread in
order, bottom posting requires
In
CAE1XxDH=2+e+p2ag55ykgtwlc+ttbptqvrzv8iunhoaxpzg...@mail.gmail.com,
on 07/27/2012
at 10:34 PM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said:
Paul Gilmartin is almost right. Both the reader and the punch
read and punched what they were presented with.
What is that supposed to mean? Bit 2 of the
In d62518tlvl2c80hjdjfkc5lqmc5icg9...@4ax.com, on 07/27/2012
at 09:27 AM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca said:
I would agree so that is why I question the changing of IP addresses.
Are you saying that you don't see why there might be a need to
reconfigure firewalls after changing if
In 1343549987.5014f22372...@postoffice.tpg.com.au, on 07/29/2012
at 06:19 PM, Shane Ginnane ibm-m...@tpg.com.au said:
Might I request the luminaries of the list perhaps indulge those of
us unfortunate enough to be using the (severely crippled) web
interface and *top post* in replies ?.
Please
In 50155783.2090...@actionsoftware.com, on 07/29/2012
at 11:32 AM, Gord Tomlin gt.ibm.li...@actionsoftware.com said:
While there is an RFC (I'm not going to hunt for the number on a
Sunday) that specifies that bottom posting is correct,
More precisely, it specifies that a response follow the
Totally off the wall request, but I've been contacted by a museum to try to
locate a 4361 or 4381 CPU and console terminal. Slight preference for the 4361
because of the integrated 3270 and ICA adapters, but either will do.
I have enough other I/O devices to form a working system, but lack the
I have configured sftp to run under USS on my z/OS V1.11 system. The physical
HFS file system associated with sftp files seems to continuously run out of
space. The data in this physical file system is transient in that it is removed
once it has been copied to the mainframe for inbound files
12 matches
Mail list logo
