Ed Gould wrote:
...we had to write a program that converted DJDE records the the format of the
3800 records (its been ages (4a?) )
Gosh! I totally forgot about that DJDE records! My, oh my, how the time flies!
That was interesting technology, but now not in use these days... I remember
the
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 17:00:02 -0400, Thomas David Rivers riv...@dignus.com
wrote:
I'm having some issues with using the OS Simulation
macros NOTE and POINT under VM/CMS.
I've been scouring documentation to try and
discover just what the CMS differences are...
But, at the moment, I'm trying to
W dniu 2012-08-08 03:20, Robert A. Rosenberg pisze:
At 10:17 + on 08/07/2012, Pearce, Colin E wrote about Re: Auditors
Don't Know Squat!:
Ask the Auditors if they will help you fill out all the APARs and
collect the supporting documents
IMO: Any Auditor who wants to tell me how to do
At 09:40 +0200 on 08/08/2012, R.S. wrote about Re: Auditors Don't Know Squat!:
W dniu 2012-08-08 03:20, Robert A. Rosenberg pisze:
At 10:17 + on 08/07/2012, Pearce, Colin E wrote about Re: Auditors
Don't Know Squat!:
Ask the Auditors if they will help you fill out all the APARs and
Hi,
I am probably asking a very simple Question but I am unable to interpret
Properly. I tried allocating a PS file with space Unit=Bytes, Primary as
1,RECFM=FB,LRECL=80, but when I view the Dataset Information shows the
primary Extent is occupied with *55840 bytes* :
General Data
On Aug 8, 2012, at 01:04, Alan Altmark wrote:
First pointer: We welcome your CMS questions over on IBMVM! ;-)
Sorry I haven't been watching IBM-MAIN as closely as I should, but the TTR
isn't. It's the CMS file system record number of the record that was just
read (shifted left 8 bits)
Jake,
Minimum allocation for a file on DASD is one track.
Richard
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jake anderson
Sent: 08 August 2012 01:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Space Allocation In Bytes
Hi,
I
W dniu 2012-08-08 13:40, Jake anderson pisze:
Hi,
I am probably asking a very simple Question but I am unable to interpret
Properly. I tried allocating a PS file with space Unit=Bytes, Primary as
1,RECFM=FB,LRECL=80, but when I view the Dataset Information shows the
primary Extent is
esmie moo wrote:
I am trying to use more than 1 FILTERDD while attempting to backup several
dsns using DFDSS. I keep getting the error message : ADR126E (001)-RI01 (01),
RIGHT PARENTHESIS MISSING AFTER 'INDSNS01 '
Is this because I am using more than 1 FILTERDD
Yes. After I have RTFM, I see
On Aug 8, 2012, at 06:06, R.S. wrote:
BTW: your allocation request was
illogical - you wanted to have 80-byte records and requested 1 byte.
Such request has to be re-interpreted or canceled. ;-)
I believe the block specification is an average. As such, it's
not required to be a
Yes, it is because you are filtering on more than one DD name. Instead, just
concatenating the two DSNs onto the first DD name should work.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets®
9151 Boulevard 26 . N. Richland Hills . TX 76010
(817) 255-3225
W dniu 2012-08-08 16:00, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Aug 8, 2012, at 06:06, R.S. wrote:
BTW: your allocation request was
illogical - you wanted to have 80-byte records and requested 1 byte.
Such request has to be re-interpreted or canceled. ;-)
I believe the block specification is an
A zero byte VB record is expanded to 1 blank x'40' so the minimum is a
block of 9 bytes including block size and record size field.
I tried to allocate a FB 6 0 to hold a list of volsers for a table,
LRL under 10 would not work.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
On Aug 8, 2012, at 09:11, Mike Schwab wrote:
A zero byte VB record is expanded to 1 blank x'40' so the minimum is a
block of 9 bytes including block size and record size field.
??? No.
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/dgt2d490/3.1.3.1.2
Title: z/OS V1R12
Thanks for the advice.
From: Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2012 9:58:04 AM
Subject: Re: DFDSS QUESTION - FILTERDD
esmie moo wrote:
I am trying to use more than 1 FILTERDD while
In 8082333213958528.wa.alanaltmarkus.ibm@listserv.ua.edu, on
08/08/2012
at 02:04 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com said:
Sorry I haven't been watching IBM-MAIN as closely as I should, but
the TTR isn't. It's the CMS file system record number of the
record that was just read
W dniu 2012-08-08 17:11, Mike Schwab pisze:
A zero byte VB record is expanded to 1 blank x'40' so the minimum is a
block of 9 bytes including block size and record size field.
I tried to allocate a FB 6 0 to hold a list of volsers for a table,
LRL under 10 would not work.
Do you mean
In 0fdb46cc-7d2e-4887-9f5c-fc29d9c2b...@aim.com, on 08/08/2012
at 09:45 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
I do not find a stated minimum for the BDW. Absent firm
information, I'll assume 4-byte blocks (nothing but BDW) are
permissible.
No, the minimum ios 8; see 3.2.3.1 Block
In
CAJTOO58735VUTbFZ-GL2hvGg5=p=zoaf0271gsclbqt0y4j...@mail.gmail.com,
on 08/08/2012
at 10:11 AM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com said:
A zero byte VB record is expanded to 1 blank x'40' so the minimum is
a block of 9 bytes including block size and record size field.
Are you sure didn't
It wasn't easy. It was a Macro CICS shop on top of that, we were doIng a lot of
CICS transactions and swore it was our code/IBM's. Later it was pretty funny. I
never mind ppl not knowing that's not a big issue, but blaming without knowing
or thinking you know well..what can I say ...
Scott
Barbara,
Just curious you don't use dsitbl01 anymore or am I dating myself .lol
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Aug 8, 2012, at 1:08 AM, Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net wrote:
Mark,
No we don't, and that was one of the options I was looking at yesterday.
use this one. You will
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+...@patriot.net wrote:
In
CAJTOO58735VUTbFZ-GL2hvGg5=p=zoaf0271gsclbqt0y4j...@mail.gmail.com,
on 08/08/2012
at 10:11 AM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com said:
deleted
I tried to allocate a FB 6 0 to hold a list of volsers
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 09:18:35 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+...@patriot.net wrote:
To increment the record number by one, add 256 to the TTR.
ITYM add 256 to the TTRz.
Does this work when you cross a track boundary? I might expect it to
work less well for TTRz than for relative block
No, and a track boundary is not a multiple of 256. You have to compare the new
record number to the maximum number of records that will fit on the track. Or,
even more fun, if your records are variable-length, then you get to play with
the track balance service to see if there is enough room
On Aug 8, 2012, at 1:56 PM, George, William@FTB wrote:
-
SNIP
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Hello,
We have used the bookmanager function with sdsf for years... but alas with
version 10 of db2 no more book manager.
Here is my attempt at a macro for the vista3270 emulator which calls lookat if
you highlight the text and press the
macro button .. I imagine it could be recoded for
On Aug 7, 2012, at 7:12 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
I love it .I had a COBOL programmer bet me that our DOS/VSE
system on our 4381 was causing her abend. She bet me a dinner, well
I collected, brought her in and did a instruction trace pointed
right to her code
Scott ford
Amen bro I am a mainframe believer for long time
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Aug 8, 2012, at 12:19 AM, Thomas Kern tlk_sysp...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 8/7/2012 21:20, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 10:17 + on 08/07/2012, Pearce, Colin E wrote about Re: Auditors Don't
Know Squat!:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 1:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Decouple Accenture's Install-1 from CICS
On Aug 8, 2012, at 1:56 PM, George, William@FTB wrote:
Greetings,
We are going to have to change one our SYSPLEX members from MST to CEST. To do
this we will need to convert DFSMSRMM to Common Time Support. I'm just putting
a feeler out there to see if anyone has done this and if so were there any
unexpected issues or was the EDGUTIL utility with
George:
Find who hired them and let them have a free reign and fire them.
Ed
On Aug 8, 2012, at 4:28 PM, George, William@FTB wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-
m...@listserv.ua.edu]
On Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 1:31
In
CAJTOO5-_jCQt3_wepucjBcEqhu7sNFbv7TcE=4vabeyj5mv...@mail.gmail.com,
on 08/08/2012
at 02:15 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com said:
On TSO ISPF 3.2, it failed with record length too short so I kept
adding 1 to the LRECL until 10 worked. This was about 9 years ago.
Well, ISPF has its
32 matches
Mail list logo
