W dniu 2012-11-28 10:08, David Devine pisze:
Hello again. Forgot to mention that it's not just HSM with it's own
internal tape catalog you need to watch out for, there are some
report archiving products that have it too.
Migration of HSM data is a piece of cake. RECYCLE is your friend.
--
Contact Joe Smith by telephone at (XXX) YYY- extension QQQ or his backup
Sally Carter at extension RRR.
Tring
The number you dialed is not available because it is not paid up, cable is
stolen, or the operator is asleep or drunk or needing a bribe. Please retry
again later!
Hi,
I have come across a system which uses MetaCOBOL (CA product) and needs to be
migrated to COBOL.
Before suggesting any solution wanted to read on MetaCOBOL, but coludn't find
anything on the internet.
If someone has any pdfs/articles that could help, please share.
Adarsh
adarsh khanna wrote:
I have come across a system which uses MetaCOBOL (CA product) and needs to be
migrated to COBOL.
Where to what vendor of COBOL? On what system is that COBOL whereto you want to
migrate?
Oh yes, migration of programs is one thing. Data migration is another thing.
What
GIYF.
www.move2open.com/metacobol-to-cobol.html
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=14509093tstart=0
ftp://scftpd.ca.com/comp/R105M+11QAP.pdf
ftp://scftpd.ca.com/comp/R205M+11UGP.pdf
www.linkedin.com/groups/MetaCOBOL-Users-3267927/about
HTH..
adarsh khanna
This might be a silly question, but does the indirect volser support for
zFS's work with SMS managed extended format zFS files?
--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL
The quiet ones are the ones that change the universe...
The loud ones only take the credit.
Londo Mollari -
MetaCOBOL to IBM Z/OS Enterprise COBOL.
Requirement is to keep the as-is functionality.
Any tools that could be helpful?
Regs
Adarsh
From: Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, 30 November 2012 6:14 PM
On 11/29/2012 10:55 PM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
Nevertheless, you are allowed to mark the problem incident as Severity 1
whenever you have somebody on shift.(*) Therefore it's possible to have
your first qualified support person come in at, say, 8:00 a.m. and raise
the PMR to Severity 1. Then, as
On 11/30/2012 10:53 AM, Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 11/29/2012 10:55 PM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
Nevertheless, you are allowed to mark the problem incident as Severity 1
whenever you have somebody on shift.(*) Therefore it's possible to have
your first qualified support person come in at, say, 8:00
I've at times been asked by IBM to raise the severity to get attention - and
later lowered it - but I have generally used the willingness of the support
teams and client to be available 24x7 (in addition to technical knowledge of
the problem, symptoms, impact) as a 'test' of a true Severity
I won't do that. It's a double edged sword. I've had my management tell me
to make something a SEV1, I *think* mostly because it's important to them, or
maybe impatience.
My stock answer is always, if it's a SEV1, I have to do anything to resolve it,
up to and including disrupting the
To me, and to every shop I've ever worked at, SEV 1 means we're dead and we
are all staying here until we are working again. One time, this meant a 36
hour shift for all 3 sysprogs. I was much younger then.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
I always reserve SEV 1 to issues that have made my primary systems unusable. I
have had IBM'ers tell us to raise to SEV 1 in the morning and then drop to SEV
2 at quitting time. This never set well with me. I had a supervisor (who was
and remains an idiot) who wanted me to open a SEV 1
Hate see it go, just for the links and updates it provided.
From: vrmm...@vrm.ca.ibm.com
Reply-to: dwn...@us.ibm.com
To: efinnel...@aol.com
Sent: 11/30/2012 12:14:56 P.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: IBM developerWorks news: So long and thanks for all
In
CAE1XxDGsByDwmBjCQn1g==98ymcyxx1vi94sayu4jgjmulq...@mail.gmail.com,
on 11/29/2012
at 09:32 PM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said:
Shmuel's comments, which suggested that I did not understand some
things that I have understood for many years, were ad hominem
Nonszense: what you *wrote*
I, too, use SEV 1 only when the system is unusable. I feel fortunate that I've
only had a handful of SEV 1's over the past 17 years.
I've never had IBM make a request to raise the level as described, but I
suspect if they did, I could agree to it. That is, if I believed the issue was
SEV
On 11/30/2012 10:20 AM, McKown, John wrote:
To me, and to every shop I've ever worked at, SEV 1 means we're dead and we are all
staying here until we are working again. One time, this meant a 36 hour shift for
all 3 sysprogs. I was much younger then.
The inability to run daily system backups
Hi Ed,
I have become curious. I know you run multiple Lpars at different levels of
z/OS. It seem s unlikely to me that HSM is failing in all of them. And that you
should be able to get your back-ups, at least temporarily form a working copy :)
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:07:57 -0800, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
wrote:
On 11/30/2012 10:20 AM, McKown, John wrote:
To me, and to every shop I've ever worked at, SEV 1 means we're dead and we
are all staying here until we are working again. One time, this meant a 36
hour shift
On 11/30/2012 12:12 PM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
I have become curious. I know you run multiple Lpars at different levels of
z/OS. It seem s unlikely to me that HSM is failing in all of them. And that you
should be able to get your back-ups, at least temporarily form a working copy :)
In this
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:31:18 -0800, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
wrote:
Follow-up: Based on the PDA logs, IBM thought that one large (5000 cylinder)
ZFS
seemed to be a trigger for whatever the problem was. We backed that up manually
via BACKDS command and then the normal dailies
On 11/30/2012 12:44 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
With all the EAV fun you've already had, was that on an EAV volume in
cyl managed space?
Lol! You call that fun?? :D
This most recent issue was on, what some people on this list would call, a
'MOD-81' volume. It is an EAV, but the 5000-cylinder ZFS
Timothy,
I agree as a vendor, second software shop, worked a lot of Sev 1s. The question
always is, is it really a technical , code sev 1 or a ' political sev1', those
btw I hate. A code issue if we can reproduce it you can usually resolved IMHO.
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
Tell me and
Greg (and others),
I had a case which I could only IPL on a Sunday and raised it to a 1
(from a 2) so that support could come in and walk me through the issue.
Level 3 came in and we walked through the issue and they came up with
a issue with APL (it was a sub issue of PSF) .
They were
I had a somewhat similar situation, but it only lasted a couple of hours. A
customer had a problem with using SDSF, in that many of its functions
wouldn't work. This happened to several users. I finally put in a call to
IBM support. I put it in at a severity 2, and the level 1 person said
Sev 1 can also cover security/integrity issues. Long ago I reported that
under Profs (or maybe OfficeVision) a user could send a document (script
file) to another user with embedded codes (.sy I think) which executed
CMS or CP commands when the document was formatted, because the system's
DCF
26 matches
Mail list logo
