Hi,
I didn't find any additional doc or considerations about these 3 items
than what's indicated in the manuals.
1° WFEX report (RMF Mon III) --- DELAY Indicator --- Field: *PROC Speed
(Workflow) Guideline:
If this value is low (less than 40%), it may be due to CPU delay. If this
value is
Hi All,
I've been asked to look at our output writer routines to add the facility
to print using TCP/IP instead of (or maybe as well as) Bus Tag (EXCP.)
Can anyone with experience in this area direct me to the relevant IBM
documentation, etc?
Thanks-in-Advance.
Ken MacKenzie
Pramerica
On 27.03.2013 10:47, Ken MacKenzie wrote:
Hi All,
I've been asked to look at our output writer routines to add the facility
to print using TCP/IP instead of (or maybe as well as) Bus Tag (EXCP.)
What do you mean about output writer routines ?
JES external writer replace or application
Since your question is TCP/IP related, you might want to post it to the
IBMTCP-L mailing list.
To subscribe, send mail to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the following command in
the e-mail message body:
SUBSCRIBE IBMTCP-L
Thanks,
Mark Regan
- Original Message -
From: gsg
Since your question is TCP/IP related, you might want to post it to the
IBMTCP-L mailing list.
To subscribe, send mail to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the following command in
the e-mail message body:
SUBSCRIBE IBMTCP-L
Thanks,
Mark Regan
- Original Message -
From: Ken
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:47:06 +0100, Ken MacKenzie wrote:
I've been asked to look at our output writer routines to add the facility
to print using TCP/IP instead of (or maybe as well as) Bus Tag (EXCP.)
Can anyone with experience in this area direct me to the relevant IBM
documentation, etc?
You may want to look at a product called Vital Signs
I dont remember te vender.
-- Original Message --
From: gsg gsg_...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Monitoring Max sockets
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:10:07 -0500
What are some good tcpip monitoring tools? Does
We use VIP, it's put out by SDS. We have one application that we monitor max
sockets for.
http://www.sdsusa.com/
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of esst...@juno.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 7:04 AM
To:
Putting a file to SYSOUT with IEBGENER ...
Is there a limit. blksize that can be used...
File is currently VBM 32756 32760
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:09:16 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
I think you are reading too much into John's presentation.
I don't think he is.
After thinking about it I would guess that the exec statement and
parm will remain essentially the same and if you want to pass a
longer parm then you would
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:24:49 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
When long PARMS have been discussed here previously, the reactionaries
and IBM loyalists have objected, Oh, no! We can't have that! Suddenly
programs that clearly failed on JCL errors will instead program check
on buffer overruns and our
Ron Wells wrote:
Putting a file to SYSOUT with IEBGENER ...
Please show us the job used.
Is there a limit. blksize that can be used...
It depends.
File is currently ...
Do you mean a DATASET or is it an OMVS File?
... VBM 32756 32760
What are these numbers? LRECL, BLKSIZE, DSORG, etc?
MacKinney
From: Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 03/27/2013 06:03 AM
Subject:Re: Output Writer and TCP/IP
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:47:06 +0100, Ken MacKenzie wrote:
We use MacKinney's JQP. You put the output on the SPOOL like normal, with a
DEST=. JQP is a started task which uses the JES API to read the output. It
then uses the LPR protocol over IP to send the output to LPR printers,
Windows print servers, and a product called RPM (I think) which runs on
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:13:58 -0500, John McKown wrote:
If you need a freebie, then there is the every unpopular IBM Network
Print Server, which is part of Communictions Server (TCPIP/VTAM). I
actually got this working once. It stinks like Limburger cheese left in a
closed up car in the Texas
A third-party product is not completely out of the question but since we
have the current external writer routines well ensconced in the system
with our own specific tailoring, etc. the thinking is that massaging a
new product may be as costly and time consuming as amending what we have.
The
Tom Marchant wrote
begin extract
Indeed, when I started as an application programmer in 1970, that was
the standard that my code was expected to follow.
/end extract
and that is what I have always recommended and, on occasion, embodied
in programming standards.
This notion is also embedded in
Bernard,
MVS Installation Exits definitely says that you should be able to add the
exit via PROGxx, and you have collected ample evidence that it is not working
correctly for you. I believe last week you had indicated you were considering
opening a PMR, and I would say that is the correct
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:06:58 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
When long PARMS have been discussed here previously, the reactionaries
and IBM loyalists have objected, Oh, no! We can't have that! Suddenly
programs that clearly failed on JCL errors will instead program check
on buffer overruns and our
Ken,
What are you using now? Is it a home-built product or is it, for example,
IBM's PSF, or something else?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ken MacKenzie
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 7:30 AM
To:
Home-built. Written about 100 years ago by someone who's left the company
or died or both.
Ken MacKenzie
Pramerica Systems Ireland Limited
is a private company limited by shares
incorporated and registered in the Republic of Ireland with registered
number 319900
and registered office at
Ed Jaffe wrote:
On 3/26/2013 3:24 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
From:
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?subtype=cainfotype=anappname=iSourcesupplier=877letternum=ENUSZP13-0013
oSupport for passing parameter lists up to 32,760 bytes in length
to a program from JCL. A
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
begin extract
It has been patiently explained to me here that STORAGE OBTAIN is
biased toward doubleword multiples. But PARM contains a halfword
length that doesn't count itself. So I'd expect the limit to be
either 32758 (8*4095-2) or 32766 (8*4096-2). Again, why 32760?
There are three parts to your problem
Spool reading, file transfer, and output formatting.
The LPR command will do spool reading, file transfer, and output formatting
for most printers
The FTP command will do spool reading, file transfer, and output formatting for
some printers, just not
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:03:03 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
Consider now what happens if storage is allocated on a doubleword
boundary D. The next doubleword boundary is at D + 8. Placing the
halfword current-length prefix at D + 6 ensures that any doubleword
alignment for what begins at D + 8 is
Don't Leave Your Successors Adrift
Mentoring, training and documentation can keep mainframes humming
http://www.destinationz.org/Mainframe-Solution/Trends/Mentoring-Training-Documentation-Mainframe.aspx
--
Gabriel Goldberg, Computers and Publishing, Inc. g...@gabegold.com
3401 Silver
Hi list,
I did some searching of the archives and didn't see anything so I'll ask what I
hope to be a simple question. I have a need to be able to execute an MVS
command and have the output available to a batch job for further processing.
In this case, I want to be able to capture the output
I'll reply to my own message. I did some more digging and found several
examples of how I can do this, so never mind.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex R.
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:42 AM
To:
I am testing the standalone dump process to a 3590 tape.
Once I create the tape how can I read it, IPCS appears to be great for reading
dumps on disk.
Also is the AMD066I error message a concern, Where does one find the code=
reasons
AMD108I DUMPING OF AUXILIARY STORAGE FOR MINIMAL ASIDS
Dana,
What release of Z/OS are you running? IBM has stated that NPF users should
convert to INFO Print. I have not heard of any dates for them to pull the plug
on NPF.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Dana Mitchell
For those that like HHGG - Here is a new twist from ACM (Association for
Computing Machinery)
http://www.acm.uiuc.edu/errors/404.html
Lizette
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
I am testing the standalone dump process to a 3590 tape.
Once I create the tape how can I read it, IPCS appears to be great
for reading dumps on disk.
You should copy the dump from tape to disk before using IPCS
to do dump analysis. Also, you can dump directly to disk.
That is usually
Jim
Thanks, I just realized the version difference
As far as power outage, its past my influence.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Wednesday, 27 March, 2013 1:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Hello,
OK to ask for some help please, or where might I go?:-) Am not a sysprog, hope
to be back on a z/OS machine in a short while, have to convert several ooREXX's
to mainframe acceptability so, to save some mainframe time $'s, if I may, will
ask neophyte questions (have googled); that said
This has all been very entertaining but there are two reasons why it is 32760:
1) the storage layout has always consisted of two fullword fields followed by
the parameter string storage. The two fullwords plus 32760 bytes of parameters
conveniently fits in 8 pages, and 2) 32760 is also the
35 matches
Mail list logo
