PMR 40718,923,848 opened.
Bernard
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Hi,
I tried changing the service class on a job sing the command:
E N641D07M,SRVCLASS=BATHI
And got this message:
IRA702I RESET NOT VALID FOR N641D07M. IT IS A SYSTEM-CONTROLLED ADDRESS
SPACE
The job was submitted from Control-M and is running in a WLM managed initiator.
Why is this happening?
Did you check the explanations in IRA702I why it could have become a system
controlled address space?
Is it a batchjob, submitted by Control-M? Is it still in the Initiator phase,
allocating devices of waiting for en enqueued dataset?
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
It is a regular Batch Job.
We use CA-OPS to change the Service class for certain jobs.
The OPS rule that issue the command waits for the $HASP373 message.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Sent:
I did that, but I still would like to know why this is happening.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Cobe Xu
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 10:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Changing Service Class
$HASP373 is issued in the very early stages of a job, it might still be being
handled by the initiator, the command may be issued too early.
Is the job running or still waiting for datasets?
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
The job has completed a long time ago.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 10:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Changing Service Class
$HASP373 is issued
Ok, rephrase: was the job normally executing of e.g. waiting for datasets at
the moment of the reset command and the IRA702I message?
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of ??? ?? ???
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013
It doesn't look like it.
There are 'WAITING FOR DATASET' messages.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 11:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Changing
Dear Gadi
Instead of CA-OPS try to use Control-M WLMSCTBL (WLM SRVCLASS TABLE) to chnage
service class of your jobs submitted by control-M.
Kind Regards
Kostas Zafiropoulos
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Thanks. I'll check it out.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Kostas Z.
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 11:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Changing Service Class
Dear Gadi
Instead of CA-OPS try to use
Rex,
You can run SDSF commands in batch . Look for the SDSF manual. I am sure this
is the way to proceed with your issue.
Thanks, David Kramf
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Charles Mills wrote:
And the answer is ...
And I hear a drrum ro! ;-D
A bug in my code was causing my software to *very occasionally* send out a
message in which the initial part of the message was malformed for the
protocol it implements. (Syslog, in the UNIX/RFC 3164 sense of
Hi all,
Is there any sorting tool in the market that is eligible to run in a zIIP
processor? We would like to replace DFsort that is running only in a z/Series
general processor.
Thanks in advance
Kostas
--
For IBM-MAIN
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 08:21:06 -0500, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com
wrote:
SELECT CURRENT-TIME FROM sysibm.systables
Make that
SELECT 1 FROM SYSIBM.SYSDUMMY1
and test for SQLCode = 0.
Uses quite a lot less cycles.
Cheers,
Jantje.
Steve Thompson wrote:
The spoofing is so good in some cases, they even make it look like it was
sent from your ISP (IP address, etc.).
ITYM that the spoofing was good enough to fool someone that didn't know how to
read headers. Can you post the full header of a sample message, either here or
Gadi wrote:
I tried changing the service class on a job sing the command:
E N641D07M,SRVCLASS=BATHI
IRA702I RESET NOT VALID FOR N641D07M. IT IS A SYSTEM-CONTROLLED ADDRESS SPACE
The job was submitted from Control-M and is running in a WLM managed initiator.
For Control-M it does not matter in
On 04/02/13 06:17, K wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any sorting tool in the market that is eligible to run in a zIIP
processor? We would like to replace DFsort that is running only in a z/Series
general processor.
Thanks in advance
Kostas
Syncsort for zOS can offload some of its processing to
if a program is running in an APF environment but is not
itself marked AC(1), do the PARMDD considerations apply?
No.
When the jobstep is not to be marked APF-authorized (i.e., the environment
is not APF or the jobstep program is not AC(1) ), the 100 character
restriction is not applied.
Thanks. I'm not very DB2 literate. Not that stops me from shooting off my
mouth. But I do get a number of misfires. grin/
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Jantje. jan.moeyers...@gfi.be wrote:
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 08:21:06 -0500, John McKown
john.archie.mck...@gmail.com wrote:
SELECT
A lot less cycles here replaces a derisory number of them by an
exiguous one. Jantje's example could be further refined, but to
what end?
This sort of suboptimizing is not san appropriate use of anyone's time.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
Peter Relson wrote:
if a program is running in an APF environment but is not itself marked AC(1),
do the PARMDD considerations apply?
No.
When the jobstep is not to be marked APF-authorized (i.e., the environment is
not APF or the jobstep program is not AC(1) ), the 100 character restriction
Hello,
Are there any seperate LISTSERV for zPDT users ?
Jake
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
John Gilmore wrote:
A lot less cycles here replaces a derisory number of them by an exiguous
one. Jantje's example could be further refined, but to what end?
Your point is well taken.
I think the OP wants to check whether a DB2 system is available or reachable
from somewhere [1]. The only
Jake,
Have you tried doing an internet search? I did one and came up with the
following link that may be helpful
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/bit.listserv.ibm-main/iz
cfTXU2wXc
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I think it's Peter's phraseology.
the 100 character restriction is not applied This sentence has two
negatives in it. In math, if might be not(APF) = not(100 character
restriction) The 100 character restriction phrase means that the
initiator checks for the length of the PARM string when the
If you have DB2 you will still have DFSORT. Just a smaller version to support
DB2 functions
If you do not have DB2 then SYNCSORT is an alternative.
What version of DFSORT and z/OS are you running?
You might also check Professor Sort
W dniu 2013-04-02 15:36, Lizette Koehler pisze:
If you have DB2 you will still have DFSORT. Just a smaller version
to support DB2 functions
But this has nothing to do with the choice DB2 vs Syncsort. You can have
Syncsort and use it everywhere except internal use of DB2.
If you do not
On 4/2/2013 6:19 AM, Jake anderson wrote:
Are there any seperate LISTSERV for zPDT users ?
The most official zPDT discussion I know of is z1090 on yahoo
groups. That discussion is moderated by Bill Ogden.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El
Unless IBM has changed to allow Syncsort to be used, my understanding was that
IBM was only using DFSORT for DB2 functions. So several shops where I worked
that had SYNCSORT, for DB2- IBM Shipped DFSORT for DB2. So for batch sorts, I
would see the WER messages. When working on DB2 utilities
Liz, et al,
IBM markets DB2Sort as an upgrade to DFSort for DB2 applications. DB2Sort is a
modified version of Syncsort MFX designed to work in unison with the DB2
utilities.
So, while it is true that you can't use Syncsort MFX with DB2, you can get the
power, and z/IIP offload, of Syncsort
Chris,
Thanks for the info. I will update my notes.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf
Of Blaicher, Christopher Y.
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 7:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFSORT
http://www.askmorgan.net/includes/aprilnews.php
Role moralisateur educateur . le citoyen passe dans l-artiste et avec un grand
et noble tableau nous avons une lecon de morale sociale et politique.
4/2/2013 4:28:23 PM
kumar009p
Does the service units counted by RMCT describes the physical machine (or
Lpar) or the virtual machine?
ITschak
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
Why not assign them directly through your WLM policy?
--Original Message--
From: Kostas Z.
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
ReplyTo: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Changing Service Class
Sent: 2 Apr 2013 04:30
Dear Gadi
Instead of CA-OPS try
Hi, all.
I am collecting SMF type 42 records to report changes (creations and renaming)
of PDS and PDSE members, but for PDSE it is not being written record 42
(subtype 25) when renaming a member.
Someone know about this? Is it a bug? Is there another way to take this
information?
I'm
According to the SMF Manual
Subtype 25 is written when a member is renamed from a PDS or a PDSE to
indicate who or what (job, started task, or TSO user) renamed the member. It
contains the name of the data set and the volume serial of the volume on which
it resided, as well as the old name and
Complementing: I'm renaming the member through the ISPF/Edit panel.
José ADAUTO Ribeiro
Em 02/04/2013 14:18, Jose ADAUTO Ribeiro jada...@uol.com.br escreveu:
Hi, all.
I am collecting SMF type 42 records to report changes (creations and renaming)
of PDS and PDSE members, but for PDSE it
Hi,
Thanks for your answer.
I'm using the ISPF/Edit panel to rename the PDS and PDSE member; for PDS member
the SMF type 42 subtype 25 record is being written.
José ADAUTO Ribeiro
Em 02/04/2013 14:57, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com escreveu:
According to the SMF Manual
Subtype
Why do it that way? If you know enough about the job to create a rule to change
the job at submission, you know enough to create a WLM classification rule.
You also won't have to worry about timing.
When the only tool you have is a hammer, all problems look like nails!
-
Ted MacNEIL
Lizette,
Do you not feel like there is a whole in the SMF collection process created by
IEBCOPY? The omission to create the SMF 42 type 25 records to document the
changes to members of a PDS/ PDSE results in an inability to produce an
accurate audit of member change activity.
Regards
Otto H
Chip Davis wrote:
Have you seen what they go for on eBay, Jim?
I've seen asking prices of north of $1/card (no idea if they actually got
that). Sometimes the value is in the pre-printing more than the card itself.
Somewhere I've got a small stash of Triangle Universities Computation Center
Hi,
I think too. The iebcopy is widely used to run out of this facility.
But the ISPF/Edit don't use STOW (or DSERV) to rename a member only when the
file is a PDSE?
José ADAUTO Ribeiro
Em 02/04/2013 16:00, Schumacher, Otto otto.schumac...@hp.com escreveu:
Lizette,
Do you not feel like
Actually I think sometimes the older utilities are a bit behind the new
technology.
PDS/E and IEBCOPY are ones that I would suspect need to catch up to each other.
So a bug - probably not.
A technology issue - probably/possibly.
IEBCOPY is very old and to change it requires a lot of work.
This piece will repay your attention. It is the first open-literature
discussion of the market for 'exploits' and who is selling what to
whom for how much that I have seen.
An 'exploit' is a piece of software that can be used by its developer
or a purchaser to penetrate a computer that is using
On 4/2/2013 2:21 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
This piece will repay your attention. It is the first open-literature
discussion of the market for 'exploits' and who is selling what to
whom for how much that I have seen.
An 'exploit' is a piece of software that can be used by its developer
or a
GIYF. The Economist has its own, large website. I received my copy
of this week's Economist in this morning's mail.
On 4/2/13, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
On 4/2/2013 2:21 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
This piece will repay your attention. It is the first open-literature
At 4/2/2013 04:26 PM, Steve Comstock wrote:
Do you have a link for an online version?
My friend, The Google tells me the link is
IEBPDSE is useful for verifying the integrity of a PDSE [directory].
It provides no alternative to missing SMF records.
It is, however, of great interest. If you specify the DUMP PARM
option it produces a dump of the target corrupt PDSE directory when it
finds a flaw. I have learned a lot
On 2 April 2013 16:21, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
This piece will repay your attention. It is the first open-literature
discussion of the market for 'exploits' and who is selling what to
whom for how much that I have seen.
There have been discussions in less well informed and well
You don't need to subvert z/OS to subvert a system. There are myriad
business critical programs that run in problem state. While well
formed RACF rules can offer protection, I wonder how many such rules
are well formed.
In any case, a malicious or sloppy insider doesn't have to be
inside the
On 2 April 2013 18:26, Dave Cole dbc...@gmail.com wrote:
You don't need to subvert z/OS to subvert a system. There are myriad
business critical programs that run in problem state. While well formed RACF
rules can offer protection, I wonder how many such rules are well formed.
In any case, a
I have had discussions with a number of other old dogs, and the
consensus is that it would still be possible to bring down z/OS from,
say, a TSO terminal. One would of course need to know what one was
doing; but the notion that there are no rogues who have the necessary
competences is a dangerous
Or know where the copy button is on the cut sheet printer!
In a message dated 4/2/2013 5:23:28 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
dbc...@gmail.com writes:
He need only be inside the
business-systems-knowledgeable community or even the system's trusted
user community.
3 Years in Leavenworth?
In a message dated 4/2/2013 4:50:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
mitc...@aol.com writes:
Anyone guess what that is worth (it is still
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Ed:
Funny. The machines were being replaced with real computers at the time
(Burroughs B3500), and the IBM reps asked us operators if we wanted any parts
of the machines since they were being retired to the junk heap.
Mitch
-Original Message-
From: Ed Finnell
I just did a 3.1 rename -- the full screen variant -- get a member list, type
R next to a member, the new name, and hit enter.
DFSMS cut a Type 42 record. Other fields:
RType: 42 - Action: 25 - Action: Rename - Lvl: V01R13M0 - Prod: Z/OS DFSMS -
Job: xx - Step: DEVPROC - Proc: DEVPROC -
It is definitely not a firewall or other external issue
I guess all debugging consists of finding out where you wuz wrong.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013
Yeah, been there too. They were probably in error.
In a message dated 4/2/2013 6:15:08 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
mitc...@aol.com writes:
IBM reps asked us operators if we wanted any parts of the machines since
they were being retired to the junk heap.
On 2 Apr 2013 14:59:52 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On 2 April 2013 16:21, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
This piece will repay your attention. It is the first open-literature
discussion of the market for 'exploits' and who is selling what to
whom for how much that I
In
CAE1XxDEFdeTyx4UjpVjZS7KcRnr5HHvRt=ocvya84sor7ya...@mail.gmail.com,
on 04/02/2013
at 05:45 PM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said:
I have had discussions with a number of other old dogs, and the
consensus is that it would still be possible to bring down z/OS
from, say, a TSO terminal.
In
2076536027233087.wa.elardus.engelbrechtsita.co...@listserv.ua.edu,
on 04/02/2013
at 05:26 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
said:
I got spam e-mails from something like absa @ absa .co .z or sb @
standardbank .co .z (I placed spaces in these e-mail addresses for
There's some more information on IBM DB2 Sort for z/OS here:
http://www.ibm.com/software/data/db2imstools/db2tools/db2-sort/
This product is optional. There's a discussion of DB2 Sort here which can
start to help you decide whether it's a good fit:
At the risk of writing like an architect, let's pause to consider that the
problem might be more than a one-off problem. DB2 might be one important
ingredient in consistently delivering a particular business outcome, but
it's probably only one ingredient among several.
If the problem statement
64 matches
Mail list logo
