On 6/3/2013 10:38 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Il a les défauts de ses qualités. To wit, the continued reliance on 24-bit
addressing.
I think that IBM has no tolerable choice in this. Clients have major
investments in functional software, and I can't see them rewriting
solely for
Hi
Maybe the VLF can help me, but I don't see clearly how.
We have test job-streams with a large number of test jobs(50-500 job),
every job uses the same STEPLIB,
and a number of other datasets, they are same in the job-stream.
(all are PDSE datasets, parameter and message members)
From the
I want to set up a second TCPIP stack to do some testing. I have the
following coded in BPXPRMxx.
FILESYSTYPE TYPE(INET) ENTRYPOINT(EZBPFINI)
SUBFILESYSTYPE NAME(TCPIP)
TYPE(INET)
ENTRYPOINT(EZBPFINI)
NETWORK DOMAINNAME(AF_INET)
DOMAINNUMBER(2)
MAXSOCKETS(3)
Hello ,
We are running Z/OS 1.11 in our environment and recently had a problem
with Auto-sched jobs in Jobtrac . There were a set of auto-sched jobs which
comes to JES2 and jobtrac puts a HOLD on it by design (for Auto-sched
processing) . Later ,Jobtrac issues a release command to free them for
How many convertor tasks are you running? You can find out by command
$DPCE(CNVT). What is the jobdef option cnvt_enq set to ? You can find out by
command $JOBDEF,CNVT_ENQ ?
Doug
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 17:03:39 +0530, baby eklavya baby.ekla...@gmail.com wrote:
It was found that JES2 conversion
Miklos,
As it is a PDSE load library, LLA freeze can probably help you first.
VLF will not do anything for PDSE that are not load library or REXX. You'll
need to tune your PDSE buffering parms to get improvements.
Lizette has a lot of experience with this...
Ron
-Original Message-
I have been using google, and other search lists. The amount of false
positive hits is astounding.
What I am looking for is an equivalent to IBM Main for VM/CMS.
The only link I found to such was for an entity in North Carolina that now
gives a 404.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
Howdy,
Check this site, http://www.vm.ibm.com/techinfo/listserv.html
Regards,
Neil Haley
nha...@ca.ibm.com
Storage Software Mainframe Support
http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/ | http://www.about.me/NeilHaley
From: Steve Thompson sthomp...@us.ibm.com
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu,
Date:
Actually there is definitely a LINUX, VM and other similar newsgroups.
The IBM z/VM Operating System ib...@listserv.uark.edu
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Steve Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 8:32 AM
mailto:lists...@listserv.uark.edu
subscribe vmesa-l Steve Thompson
or go to:
http://listserv.uark.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=VMESA-L
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Neil Haley nha...@ca.ibm.com wrote:
Howdy,
Check this site, http://www.vm.ibm.com/techinfo/listserv.html
Regards,
Neil Haley
I should have added
To subscribe, send mail to lists...@listserv.uark.edu with the command
(paste it!) in the e-mail message body:
SUBSCRIBE IBMVM
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent:
The 'master' list of all discussion lists using listserver is at
http://www.lsoft.com/lists/list_q.html
Thanks,
Mark Regan
- Original Message -
From: Steve Thompson sthomp...@us.ibm.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 11:31 AM
Subject: Gives There a
From: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
Date: 06/04/2013 11:55 AM
Actually there is definitely a LINUX, VM and other similar newsgroups.
The IBM z/VM Operating System ib...@listserv.uark.edu
Lizette
Thanx. I knew it existed, I just couldn't remember the domain.
On 4 June 2013 11:31, Steve Thompson sthomp...@us.ibm.com wrote:
What I am looking for is an equivalent to IBM Main for VM/CMS.
Well... There's nothing to say that VM topics shouldn't be discussed
on IBM-MAIN. Certainly most of the discussion is closely related to
z/OS, but this list is not
Gentle Readers,
I am looking at the ARCCMD parm and I was wondering what the significance of
this ADDVOL parm for PRIMARYvolume
ADDVOL SYS009 PRIMARY(NOAM AREC NOAB NOAD MIGRATE(10)) UNIT(3390)
ADDVOL SYS010 PRIMARY(NOAM AREC NOAB NOAD MIGRATE(10)) UNIT(3390)
ADDVOL SYS011 PRIMARY(NOAM AREC
Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
begin extract
I think that IBM has no tolerable choice in this. Clients have major
investments in functional software, and I can't see them rewriting
solely for modernization, and I cannot see IBM forcing the issue.
/end extract
and I am sure that he is right about how
Hello Doug ,
Thanks for your response . $DPCE(CNVT) indicates 4 PCE's defined and created
$HASP653 PCE(CNVT) COUNT=(4,4,0),ACTIVE=0,TRACE=NO
Also , CNVT_ENQ is set to FAIL
On 6/4/13, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
You may also wish to look at the $JD commands (HISTORY,
I would wonder if you had 4 jobs that were using jcllib and were waiting on an
HSM recall. Check out this Share presentation for a very good explanation of
possible converter perfomance issues.
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/s390/jes2/Share104/s2663lp1.pdf
Doug
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 22:14:38 +0530,
Hello Lizette ,
Thanks for your inputs . $JD commands look normal . Our environment
has a MAS setup with 3 systems .We have more than 15000 Auto Sched
jobs in our daily cycle . As far as i know , there are many jobs
submitted at the same time (approx 20 - 30) ,but this problem doesn't
happen all
But all lists don't use Lsoft. Sam has a link to lists on _www.cbttape.org_
(http://www.cbttape.org)
(down left hand side) but the last time I tried it a few of the lists had
moved!
Chuckie has been a long time participant with ibm-main although his
responsibilities have shifted.
In a
_IBM buys SoftLayer as part of public cloud push | PCWorld_
(http://www.pcworld.com/article/2040723/ibm-buys-softlayer-as-part-of-public-cloud-push.htm
l)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Well said!!!
Laura Schneider, DCIO, TSSCD, DMSB
Rural Development
U.S. Department of Agriculture
4300 Goodfellow Blvd.
St. Louis, MO 63102
Phone: 314-457-4922
www.rurdev.usda.gov
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of
I would suggest you run with more converter tasks. We have ours set at the max
allowed (10). I would also question the amount hold and dormancy time you have
for the checkpoint for each system. Lizette's question about other datasets on
the checkpoint volume is also very important.
Doug
On
The addvol command is used to define non-SMS managed volumes to DFHSM. SMS
managed volumes are defined in the MGMTCLAS/STORGRP ACS constructs.
Deciphering:
ADDVOL SYS009 PRIMARY(NOAM AREC NOAB NOAD MIGRATE(10))
NOAM - NO AUTOMIGRATION
AREC - AUTORECALL
NOAB - NO AUTOBACKUP
NOAD - NO AUTODUMP
_Moto X: Motorola reveals plans for ink and even pills to replace ALL your
passwords | Mail Online_
(http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2333203/Moto-X-Motorola-reveals-plans-ink-pills-replace-ALL-passwords.html?ito
=feeds-newsxml)
When was it T.J. Watson got in so much trouble
I known that most, if not all, of the IBM compilers have exits which allow
a person to supply or modify both input and/or output records. I have used
this with a freeware program called FLOWASM for HLASM, which allows free
form assembler statements. What I am wondering is if anybody would really
On 06/04/2013 01:02 PM, Ed Finnell wrote:
_Moto X: Motorola reveals plans for ink and even pills to replace ALL your
passwords | Mail Online_
(http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2333203/Moto-X-Motorola-reveals-plans-ink-pills-replace-ALL-passwords.html?ito
=feeds-newsxml)
When
Strain the sewer lines out of the pentagon for the little pills
CIT | Ken Porowski | VP Mainframe Engineering | Information Technology | +1 973
740 5459 (tel) | ken.porow...@cit.com
This email message and any accompanying materials may contain proprietary,
privileged and confidential
With PL/1, for example, many of the things you want can be done IMHO
using the PL/1 preprocessor facility. We use it for example to enforce some
site rules, for example: some PL/1 statements which must not be used at
our site. The macro statements which do this are included in a startup macro
COBOL does not seem to have anything like the PL/1 preprocessor. Or even
the shudder/ C preprocessor. Hum, I guess it would be possible to use the
C preprocessor despite not having a C license. I don't know if it will run
or not. In any case, this sort of preprocessor is not what I would really
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013 11:02:10 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013 10:08:19 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
Why do you continue to refer to the area between 2GB and 4GB as
Within the bar? While it is true that some early presentations
depicted the bar as having a thickness of 2 GB,
You need to use CINET instead of INET. I did it years ago w/IPL. No idea if it
can be done dynamically, but I doubt it.
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On
There was a period during which virtual storage immediately above the
bar was not allocated. The rationale for not doing so was that
incorrect AMODE(31) address arithmetic could yield values in that
range.
I have no personal experience of the usefulness of this convention,
but several
sthomp...@us.ibm.com (Steve Thompson) writes:
I have been using google, and other search lists. The amount of false
positive hits is astounding.
What I am looking for is an equivalent to IBM Main for VM/CMS.
The only link I found to such was for an entity in North Carolina that now
gives
We dont have any other datasets on the checkpoint volume . I would also plan to
increase the no of converter tasks .
Regards,
Baby(Sachin)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r11/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.zos.r11.arcf000/hr1003.htm
Datasets migrated from a volume in the pool are recalled to any volume
in the pool.
If a dataset is APF authorized for a particular volume, migrating and
recalling to another volume would make it
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Joel C. Ewing jcew...@acm.org wrote:
On 06/04/2013 01:02 PM, Ed Finnell wrote:
_Moto X: Motorola reveals plans for ink and even pills to replace ALL
your
passwords | Mail Online_
Hello Doug ,
We had this problem 2 or 3 times in past few months . But each time , 4
jobs were affected (coincidence or not ) .Jobtrac by design issues the $AJ
command after 500 Milliseconds once it puts the HOLD . In that case , the
JCL conversion should have crossed more than 500 Milliseconds
We have been told by auditors that all of our JES2 JOBCLASSes should have
COMMAND=VERIFY. This would protect from someone coding an unauthorized command
in a JCL that could go undetected. Has anyone else ran into this type of
problem and if so, how did you protect against it vs. coding
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:30:44 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote:
(
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2333203/Moto-X-Motorola-reveals-plans-ink-pills-replace-ALL-passwords.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
)
The RF card in most badge reader only transmit in response to a nearby
reader emitting the
Have IT management risk accept they way you need. Then tell the auditors
that. Auditors do not have any authority beyond what management gives them.
This assumes management has tener cojones.
On Jun 4, 2013 5:49 PM, gsg gsg_...@yahoo.com wrote:
We have been told by auditors that all of our JES2
Unfortunately, no one wants to challenge audit. I can understand the the risk,
but just not this solution. It will create too many replies for the operators.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 18:05:04 -0500, gsg wrote:
Unfortunately, no one wants to challenge audit. I can understand the the
risk, but just not this solution. It will create too many replies for the
operators.
It's the boy-who-cried-wolf.
Automate it.
The auditors will moan that you shouldn't
It appears that IBM's intent in defining the bar was to make it equal to the
point where 31-bit addressing was no longer possible and any further
addressability required 32 or more bits.
Bill Fairchild
Franklin, TN
- Original Message -
From: Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com
We have run COMMAND=IGNORE for as long as I can remember. There are other
far better and more controlled ways to issue commands.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jcew...@acm.org (Joel C. Ewing) writes:
If the final verdict has not yet been reached on whether or not there
is any increased health risk from having a cell-phone transmitter next
to your head for prolonged periods, the idea of having a permanent RF
transmitter internally or attached to my
That is one thought we had and we'll be doing some testing for that.
Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Or . . . work with your Comp Ops to project how many Operators would need
to be hired to properly respond to all of the new message traffic and
project out the increase to annual expense. Then see who wants to sign
off on that. Setting the value to command=ignore wasn't what they told
you to
mike.a.sch...@gmail.com (Mike Schwab) writes:
There are car thieves who get a pair of transmitters. One is held
near the car and sends the car's query signal to the other receiver.
The other receiver is near the person leaving the car. It get's the
car's query and responds. This is sent
I don't really know it, but I believe that the C compiler is part of z/OS.
At least its versioning is the same as the z/OS versioning.
But maybe it still needs a separate license. I don't know, because we
have it (and need it) for at least 20 years now (maybe more).
The C preprocessor is in
At 03:46 +0530 on 06/05/2013, baby eklavya wrote about Re: JES2
conversion delay:
Hello Doug ,
We had this problem 2 or 3 times in past few months . But each time , 4
jobs were affected (coincidence or not ) .Jobtrac by design issues the $AJ
command after 500 Milliseconds once it puts the
Am I the only one curious why your batch jobs have that many operator
commands in the JCL?
What we did was specify command=verify for all classes except one and we
restricted that class so only sysprogs and operators could submit jobs in
it.
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe
Two weeks ago, I told you about tests with our table system,
which holds read-only data for our insurance math package.
The data was stored in DB2 tables until now, and we tried to get better
CPU usage etc. by moving the data to our file based table system, which
we have in the Windows and Unix
Did you try using a ZFS file system? On my system freads()/fwrites() to
a unix file are significantly faster than QSAM/BSAM.
On 5/06/2013 9:33 AM, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
Two weeks ago, I told you about tests with our table system,
which holds read-only data for our insurance math package.
The
Yes and yes again.
I suspect that musical chairs was more important than denotation here:
Since 'line' was unavailable because already in use, 'bar' was
chosen--well chosen in my view--to disambiguate the demarcations of
AMODE(64) and AMODE(31) address spaces.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 -
We never allowed *ANY* commands to come through a reader (of any type).
The programmers had a field day with this until I put the rules in
place.
Got a few gripes from programmers but nothing to management.
My management (and the auditors) were strictly against commands from
readers. There
Yes, I guess, that the freads on ZFS will be faster, but:
- the customer wants the files to be classical z/OS data sets, and
- because of the cache (least recently used algoritm), the I/O delays
are of no real concern any more - the elapsed time is much better than
in the DB2 case, anyway.
Hello Group,
I was in process of modifying my current IODF and did below
changes.
1) Added few more Chip id's including type of FC, OSD
2) added few more partition.
3) All these CHIP id, where I am getting below issue belong to FCP type
now when I am trying to active this new
58 matches
Mail list logo
