On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:41:11 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I prefer to be told when I make a programming error.
It looks that they are going to tell us soon.
Please see APARs OA42701, OA43000 and OA43037.
--
Klaus Stanislawiak
W dniu 2013-08-22 01:16, Mark Yuhas pisze:
Has anybody successfully FTPd the SCRT report in a batch job to a zFS file?
When I try it, I get a weird file. When I use a Windows, the file transfers
without a problem.
SCRT report is text file, PS FB 80. Such file format (and content)
usually is
Mark Yuhas wrote:
Has anybody successfully FTPd the SCRT report in a batch job to a zFS file?
When I try it, I get a weird file. When I use a Windows, the file transfers
without a problem.
Show us your FTP attempt and all messages. Please define 'weird file'.
Oh, please check Paul
In a35b6d08166be34f8e94fe908c14d3c8038...@mihqpwexmb01.aaa-acg.net,
on 08/21/2013
at 08:03 PM, Toole, Michael mto...@aaamichigan.com said:
Reentrant code considerations are contingent on the calling
environment.An exit routine called from the JES2 main task
must be reentrant in the JES2
Hello,
Below is the result of LISTCAT against the NONVSAM which I was trying to
relate and I find there are two Alias being associated.
1IDCAMS SYSTEM SERVICES TIME:
0NONVSAM --- ZOS.SAMPLJCL
HISTORY
DATASET-OWNER-(NULL)
Another thing to add : The normal Alias deletion with : DEL ZOS.LUT.SAMPJCL
ALIAS does not deletes the alias but a CATALOG parameter with
CAT(ICF.RND.CATX) deletes the alias. Not sure why it is not picking up the
usercatalog automatically during deletion.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:19 PM, mf db
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 01:10:42 -0500, Klaus Stanislawiak wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:41:11 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I prefer to be told when I make a programming error.
When did I say that?
It looks that they are going to tell us soon.
Please see APARs OA42701, OA43000 and OA43037.
APAR Identifier .. OA42701 Last Changed 13/08/07
AMATERSE INVOCATION RESULTS IN MSGIEC190I
Symptom .. IN INCORROUT Status ... CLOSED PER
Severity ... 3 Date Closed . 13/07/26
Component .. 5752SC112
According to Gentoo at
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/159880?rdf
quote
Description
===
Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in PuTTY. Please review
the CVE identifiers referenced below for details.
Impact
==
An attacker could entice a user to open connection to
These 2 APARS also address the IEC190I issue.
1. APAR OA42406: OCE FIX ROLLUP FOR HDZ2210: Individual APAR status
A fix is available. The life cycle of this APAR is complete.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA42406myns=aparmynp
=DOCTYPEstatusmync=E
Here is OA43037
https://www-304.ibm.com/ibmlink/sis/viewAparDoc.wss?context=aparAndUsagedocumentIds=OA43037searchWords=OA43037libraryType=Dlc=encc=US
http://tinyurl.com/mw3uht3
APAR Identifier .. OA43037 Last Changed 13/08/21
IRRDBU00 MSGIEC190I
Symptom .. MS
OK. I ported some C code (sqlite3 to be exact) to z/OS UNIX. This created
an object file which I then put in an FB/80 object PDS (using cp -B). I
then linked that into a PDS/E using the binder with the PARM of
ALIASES=ALL. The output shows all of the external, long, names as HIDDEN
and I can't see
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:46:26 +0530, baby eklavya baby.ekla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everyone ,
Apologize in advance for this dumb question .
I have a requirement to put some maintenance on Java filesystem which is
currently mounted on a shared sysplex root .We have 4 lpars (including the
Hello Mark ,
Thanks a lot for your inputs. It really helps !
Regards,
baby
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:46:26 +0530, baby eklavya baby.ekla...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello Everyone ,
Apologize in advance for this dumb
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:24:05 -0500, John McKown wrote:
According to Gentoo at
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/159880?rdf
quote
Description
===
Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in PuTTY. Please review
the CVE identifiers referenced below for details.
Impact
In
cae1xxdhzntyss_1w68jktuwrcqzy8uvvdaqeymfa6wzojpz...@mail.gmail.com,
on 08/21/2013
at 10:21 PM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said:
In one shop, call it S to protect the guilty, the applications
programmers were very reluctant, perhaps for sentimental reasons, to
give up using it long
I was able to do the following
1. Def a new PDS
2. Def alias. Def alias (name(mytsoid.cattest.cntl) relate(tsoid.test
cat.cntl)
This was successful
3. Def another alias with my altid. Also successful
Going to ispf 3.4. I bring up my dataset group
I then enter on an alias
Del alias /
This
The supplied JCL for SCRT contains the following:
//* FOR SEQUENTIAL OUTPUT (ALL CPCS IN ONE DS)
//* CHANGE SPACE PARAMETER TO SPACE=(TRK,(15,15))
//OUTPUT DDDISP=(,CATLG),DSN=HLQ.SCRTTOOL.CSV,
// SPACE=(TRK,(15,15,15)),UNIT=SYSDA
So, PDS is the
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:55:48 -0500, John McKown wrote:
... The output shows all of the external, long, names as HIDDEN
and I can't see those aliases in an ISPF directory listing.
Is there any way to see the aliases at all? Am I missing some option in
ISPF?
Will AMBLIST show aliases? I
ISPF uses a QSAM read of the directory to build member list names.
Long names can be retrieved using the DESERV macro - which ISPF does not
use.
And then there is this little gem for the DESERV HIDE=YES/NO parameter
Hidden names are normally used only for program management binding
purposes,
Gil:
Unless I am totally missing the point of your entry, AMBLIST is
essentially for LOAD MODULES *NOT* for catalogs.
IDCAMS (or its invoker in this case ISPF) is under discussion here.
Ed
On Aug 22, 2013, at 5:27 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:55:48 -0500, John McKown
Hi experts,
I work as an application programmer with a leading bank on CICS/Cobol for
the past 4 years. Whilst I know, that data on the mainframe is stored on
disks and tapes, I have never walked in to a data-center. At any mainframe
data-center, what are different storage media used? Do they
IBM mainframes use ECKD formatted tracks.
Since the manufacture of actual 3390s ended, DASD storage has been
emulated on FBA (PC / Unix disk), usually in a RAID 5 configuration.
Occasionally, you might run across a 3380 volume as these are also
supported.
Yes, Virtual tapes are stored on disk,
Welcome to the future.
DASD has evolved to Storage Arrays that pretend to be 3390s. The Storage
Arrays can contain spinning disk or EFD/Flash Drives
Tape can either be virtual or physical depending on your environment.
Try searching for Storage Array. EMC VMAX, IBM TS7700 IBM DS8K and so
24 matches
Mail list logo
