No, this is a JES2, not WLM command: SYSTA will now not any job in class 0,
both JES and WLM managed.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ravi Gaur
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 04:54
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Lizette,
ML2 data does not dedupe well, 2 to 1 if you are very lucky. DataDomains are a
very expensive option if the dedupe ratio is poor. Ask EMC if they have other
disk options that can be placed behind their DLM boxes that just have normal
compression and replication features, it should
Same msg.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Good for me, thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 11:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Quote on Slashdot.org
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:51:29 -0400, John Gilmore wrote:
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 13:21:15 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
I programmed in PL/I
professionally and IMO Pascal is a far cleaner language with more
expressive features. Pascals successors, such as Module/2 and Delphi,
widen the gap even more.
I would never profess to have programmed in PL/I - I was
Personally I am of the opinion that a programming language is for the benefit
of the programmer, to be least hindered in the coding.
It should help the coding and minimize both syntax pondering and keystrokes.
A programming language should not have a role of disciplining the programmer.
That
On 1/10/2013 7:13 PM, Shane Ginnane wrote:
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 13:21:15 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
I programmed in PL/I
professionally and IMO Pascal is a far cleaner language with more
expressive features. Pascals successors, such as Module/2 and Delphi,
widen the gap even more.
I would
If I take REXX as an example, although it has its limitations and rough edges,
it have 4 important advantages IMHO:
1. It lives up the principle of least astonishment in syntax.
2. Its functionality and syntax is oriented towards the end goal of the code
effort.
3. It lives up to the KISS
Dear MFNetDisk fan
October 1st, 2013 brings a significant change in MFNetDisk history. On that
day, a group of mainframe veterans (MFNetDisk team) will take
responsibility for MFNetDisk promotion, marketing and sale. I will remain
the sole MFNetDisk software owner, main developer and support
On 1/10/2013 7:23 PM, Thomas Berg wrote:
Personally I am of the opinion that a programming language is for the benefit of the
programmer, to be least hindered in the coding.
It should help the coding and minimize both syntax pondering and keystrokes.
A programming language should not have a
David Crayford wrote
begin extract
I programmed in PL/I professionally and IMO Pascal is a far cleaner
language with more expressive features
end extract/
and this is a sentiment that I marvel at. I view Pascal as a toy, a
pedagogic language animated by very dubious principles.
What I think
Wouldn't SETRP DUMP=YES,DUMPOPX= be the preferred method
than SDUMPX?
DUMPOPX, providing a SNAP(X) parameter area, has less functionality and
flexibility than does SDUMP(X).
(On the positive side, it requires no authorization, but if you were
estabilshing an ARR, you at least at some point
On 1/10/2013 7:51 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
David Crayford wrote
begin extract
I programmed in PL/I professionally and IMO Pascal is a far cleaner
language with more expressive features
end extract/
and this is a sentiment that I marvel at. I view Pascal as a toy, a
pedagogic language animated
On 1/10/2013 7:41 PM, Shane Ginnane wrote:
If I take REXX as an example, although it has its limitations and rough edges,
it have 4 important advantages IMHO:
1. It lives up the principle of least astonishment in syntax.
2. Its functionality and syntax is oriented towards the end goal of the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Shane Ginnane
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 1:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Quote on Slashdot.org
If I take REXX as an example, although it has its limitations
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Thomas Berg thomas.b...@swedbank.se wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Shane Ginnane
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 1:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of David Crayford
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 1:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Quote on Slashdot.org
On 1/10/2013 7:23 PM, Thomas Berg wrote:
Personally I am
On 1/10/2013 8:23 PM, Thomas Berg wrote:
True, but:
0. I used it as an example of syntax and principles.
1. As I often compile it and if necessary optimize at a high level/use an
external tool I seldom have problems with that. (To where did you port what ?
Curious if z/OS...)
Yes. I
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 19:52:12 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
Taking the p**s again Shane! ;-)
Sorry ? - what do you mean, again.
FWIW, Perl 6 seems to have smoothed out a lot of the rough edges.
Never having bothered with Perl, I attended a Linux conference in Canberra in
2005. Went to a Perl
On 1/10/2013 8:46 PM, Shane Ginnane wrote:
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 19:52:12 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
Taking the p**s again Shane! ;-)
Sorry ? - what do you mean, again.
FWIW, Perl 6 seems to have smoothed out a lot of the rough edges.
Never having bothered with Perl, I attended a Linux
On 30 Sep 2013 13:26:38 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:55:14 -0400, John Gilmore wrote:
[Pascal] is much concerned to interdict practices, e.g., GOTOs or
unconditional branches, that it deems 'unstructured' or 'anarchic'.
Pascal has GOTO. Dismayingly,
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 11:52:16 -0300, Clark Morris wrote:
greatest value of GOTO is the longjump; the ability to exit a
nest of not only compounds, but also blocks and function calls.
I pine for this facility in Rexx, POSIX shell, and C.
IBM COBOL has EXIT PROGRAM and GOBACK both of which can be
Today IBM announces price rises for Cobol, IMS, DB2, MQ, and WebSphere in EMEA,
effective January 1, 2014:
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/7/877/ENUSZA13-1127/index.html
The very cynical would say it's about We have computers and software to
sell you, some of which can arguably be made to sound like it's Big
Data-related.
The slightly less cynical would say It's about IBM's Big Data on z
offerings.
The realistic (where that differs from the cynical--let's not go
Not really sure what to title this, so...
We currently have a Windows application that uses our terminal emulator's
EHLLAPI functionality. If you have the application running and you hit a
particular function key (I think!) while your terminal session is on an account
number it will trigger
Frank Swarbrick wrote:
Not really sure what to title this, so...
We currently have a Windows application that uses our terminal emulator's
EHLLAPI functionality. If you have the application running and you hit a
particular function key (I think!) while your terminal session is on an
account
On 2013-10-01 11:37, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
We currently have a Windows application that uses our terminal emulator's
EHLLAPI functionality.
For starters, what TN3270 emulator are you using?
--
Regards, Gord Tomlin
Action Software International
(a division of Mazda Computer Corporation)
The PL/I leave statement is very different from the C continue and that ilk.
Consider
outer: . . . ;
. . .
nested: . . . ;
. . .
innermost: . . . ;
. . .
. . . leave ; /* .leaves current group, here innnermost */
if . . . then leave outer ; /* leaves
Newbie open systems backup admin. here being thrown into mainframe storage.
We have some very old VTS systems and I'm looking for credible education /
journals on state of the art in mainframe tape (VTS) storage.
Anyone have any reccomendations of online or print journals, trade
magazines, blogs?
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 11:50:51 -0400, John Gilmore wrote:
The PL/I leave statement is very different from the C continue and that ilk.
But perhaps slightly less different from the C break.
Paul Gilmartin will object to these [and other] uses of labels, but
they are in fact innocuous.
But what
Hello,
I am planning an upgrade from zos 1.12 to 1.13 and it appears that 5655-N99IBM
64-bit SDK for z/OS V5 is no longer supported. It appears I need to upgrade SDK
to V6 or V7.
The doc for SDK V6 and V7 state that some current processes may need changes
going to V5 to V6 and/or V7.
I
We currently have E-Term for IBM from DCSi. I personally don't like it and
really am open to any emulator. A few of use (myself included) have Attachmate
Reflection for IBM. It seems to have several options, one being a .NET API.
Without really knowing about it it seems like that might do
Hello All,
Is there a simple way to run ISPF DSLIST as a batch TSO job?
Respectfully,
Willie C. Rouse
Senior Mainframe Consultant
Prince George's County, Maryland
Office of Information Technology
9201 Basil Court/ Room B8
Largo, MD 20774
Voice: 301-883-7189
Fax: 301-883-3790
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?subtype=cainfotype=anappname=iSourcesupplier=897letternum=ENUS912-249
Withdraw announcement includes links to Java SDK for z/OS 1.6 and 1.7,
and various manuals.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Kurt Eastwood kurtms...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello,
I
PL/I does check that do and end labels match, but it also permits
multiple closure, as in
gubbins: do . . . ;
nubbins: do . . . ;
end gubbins ; /* ends both nubbins and gubbins */
which it notes in a warning message.
The unlabeled analogue of this construction is, however, treated as an
Run ISPF in batch?
In a message dated 10/01/13 11:29:31 Central Daylight Time, wro...@co.pg.md.us
writes:
ISPF DSLIST as a batch TSO job?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:29:15 +, Rouse, Willie wro...@co.pg.md.us wrote:
Hello All,
Is there a simple way to run ISPF DSLIST as a batch TSO job?
You can use this JCL as a template:
(from http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21023990)
//USERAA JOB (ISPF),'ISPF
Mark,
Thanks for the info!!
Respectfully,
Willie C. Rouse
Senior Mainframe Consultant
Prince George's County, Maryland
Office of Information Technology
9201 Basil Court/ Room B8
Largo, MD 20774
Voice: 301-883-7189
Fax: 301-883-3790
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
I like my own template better (plus read the comments at the top):
//useridI JOB (ACCT),CLASS=A,...
//
//*
//* To get a
Forgive me if this is obvious to everyone but me, but I’m seeing a difference
in the way name resolution (resolver) works on MVS and OMVS. In OMVS, a command
line ping or dig or nslookup all correctly resolve a domain name. However,
issuing the PING or NSLOOKUP command in TSO or PING in batch
David,
Check the TCP/IP configuration guide for search orders. In the 1.11 level of
the manual it is in section 1.2.9.2, called resolver configuration files.
OMVS uses a different search order for the resolver than MVS does. My guess is
that is where you have to go in order to check what
And no, it's not obvious to everybody but you. A few days ago I was looking
for something similar and I came across a nice side-by-side chart showing the
differences but wasn't able to find it again today. :-(
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Tsk. Sorry 'bout that, must have confused you. I submit that a real answer
to his question was hiding in plain sight: it's IBM's Big Data on z
initiative.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:22 PM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
zMan's post, with its tendentious use of a curiously graded set of
I can't tell you how to determine (directly) if the Java5 SDK is in use.
It is, however, quite easy to just copy the HFS/ZFS files and provide the
appropriate mount points in the 1.13 OMVS file system.
The one suggestion I have is to set your External Security Manager to audit all
access to the
RSEOLVER is your friend. Ditch all of the local files and use RESOLVER...
Check the IP Config Guide for RESOLVER setup
HTH,
snip
Forgive me if this is obvious to everyone but me, but I'm seeing a difference
in the way name resolution (resolver) works on MVS and OMVS. In OMVS, a command
The easiest would be to go to vendor sites to see what they support.
Current offerings I know about are from
IBM TS7720
EMC DLm Tape solutions
Hitachi
Fujitsu
Luminex
Then there is also software tapeless solutions
CA VTAPE
Or you can search the internet for Virtual Tapes and
One other solution I forgot is to expand the storage array and eliminate
tape by keeping everything on DASD.
Not sure what your shop is looking to do, but these are some options.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf
Thanks for all the feedback. I'm having no luck. I've compared the TCPDATA
member and the OMVS resolv.conf and see no meaningful difference between them.
Still the MVS resolver is completely inoperative.
I'm inclined to open an SR with IBM and see if they can see what's different.
Thanks,
jwgli...@gmail.com (John Gilmore) writes:
What I think of Pascal and our disagreement are not themselves
important; but such differences strongly suggest that discussions of
the relative merits of different statement-level procedural languages
is an all but futile undertaking unless the
I worked with PASCAL/VS in the late 80s and early 90s and
used it a lot to do technical computations for the Stuttgart local transport
company. I built interfaces to SQL/DS (DB2 for VM in todays speak),
DMS/PANEL and GDDM - all things that were not available from IBM
in those days - and GKS
In
cajtoo5_ws5e7yu3assyudh+3hpfigfiqpeghhxx6c4chkcy...@mail.gmail.com,
on 09/28/2013
at 10:40 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com said:
I know in the Banking Industry, you have to take one whole week of
vacation sometime during the year.
What happens if they won't approve leave for the
What's the difference in Stanford and UCSD versions?
In a message dated 10/01/13 15:05:31 Central Daylight Time,
bernd.oppol...@t-online.de writes:
Today I am trying to add some - more - extensions to the old Stanford
Pascal
compiler of 1982 (running on VM/370 R6 on Hercules) with the final
Also this share presentation by Russell Witt could be helpful
http://www.share.org/p/do/sd/topic=50sid=1042
The title of the presentation is Tape Virtualization Options
You can also use that in an internet search to find a lot more articles on
virtual tape and mainframes.
Lizette
It is user and password protect!!!
Carlos Bodra
IBM Certified Specialist System z
Sao Paulo - Brazil
Em 01/10/2013 18:06, Lizette Koehler escreveu:
Also this share presentation by Russell Witt could be helpful
http://www.share.org/p/do/sd/topic=50sid=1042
The title of the presentation
Correct, I mentioned in a previous post that you had to be a member of
SHARE.org for their presentations. Though some presentations are in the public
arena. But you would need to do an internet search to find them.
If you are a member of Share.org, you can search the archives.
Lizette
Vista is a wonderful product but I don't think it is able to query a
database.
I just searched the Help and got zero hits on SQL or database, and the one
hit on query was about querying its own options settings.
You can read or write a sequential file from Vista. If you could get the
data from
Charles,
I would not rush to judgement on this.
*IF* it can script a response to a 3270 screen, say enter part number
and it send the part number to the host and what ever is returned
from the host should be readable and then the script could do its thing.
I have a difficult time with this
I don't know much about UCSD, but AFAIK this is a small PASCAL
implementation
for microcomputers. The Stanford compiler was a port of the P4 compiler of
Niklaus Wirth to the IBM mainframe with some extensions. I took the 1982
version
from the McGill University (from the MUSIC/SP system), ported
You're right. That is the sort of thing the OP wanted. I was thinking of
querying a local database on the PC.
IMHO an EHLLAPI program is a better way (NOT a good way LOL!) of doing this
than a script.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UCSD_Pascal
In a message dated 10/01/13 17:42:33 Central Daylight Time,
bernd.oppol...@t-online.de writes:
I don't know much about UCSD, but AFAIK this is a small PASCAL
implementation
--
For
Thank you.
Stanford PASCAL also generates P-Code in the first step,
which in the second step is translated to 370 machine code.
And: Urs Ammann, who is mentioned in the UCSD article
as the creator of the P-code interpreter, which was the origin
of the UCSD pascal system, is one of the authors
Depends on the particular branch, but I assume seniority would decide
who gets priority, and the boss would make the final decision.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In
cajtoo5_ws5e7yu3assyudh+3hpfigfiqpeghhxx6c4chkcy...@mail.gmail.com,
On 1 October 2013 20:06, Bernd Oppolzer bernd.oppol...@t-online.de wrote:
Stanford PASCAL also generates P-Code in the first step,
which in the second step is translated to 370 machine code.
Interesting; I had thought that P-code was only interpreted.
BTW: The P-Code of the 1982 variant of
Hi,
Some of you complain that the email of MFNetDisk team is in error and they
right.
Original message in error:
From now on, please contact the MFNetDisk team via email
mfnetd...@gmail.com for any issue related to the product. It may include
any comments and ideas so together we can make
65 matches
Mail list logo
