Hi
Thank you for all the answers.
Why delete a product ?
We are business partner , and we got till now all for free, from the
IBM, but every year got
a list about how much we shouldn't have to pay. This list has contained
the BDT and some other
components (Book Manager Read and Book
IBM would like to turn this symbolic money to real one. If I understand
correctly BDT has a symbolic price about 2000 $.
Didn't know that. I might also happen to us.
Why delete a product ?
The other reason why I might want to get rid of a product is DASD space,
especially on an ADCD
Date:Tue, 17 Dec 2013 21:33:18 -0500
From:Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net
Subject: Re: LOOKAT 404
On 17 December 2013 20:23, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
This link worked for me just now
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/
Works for me too, but it's
On 18/12/2013 2:41 PM, Avram Friedman wrote:
For years IBM has recommended that when bookmarking there sites,
Modify the HTTP string from WWW??. to WWW.
The ?? part as in WWW-03 or WWW2 is used interally to route to various
servers.
WWW.IBM* is an alais to the actual site that gets
On 2013-12-17, at 23:41, Avram Friedman wrote:
For years IBM has recommended that when bookmarking there sites,
Modify the HTTP string from WWW??. to WWW.
The ?? part as in WWW-03 or WWW2 is used interally to route to various
servers.
WWW.IBM* is an alais to the actual site
The U.S. Gov't can't get it right!
snip
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of David Crayford
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 8:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: LOOKAT 404
On 18/12/2013 10:33 AM, Tony Harminc
On 18/12/2013, at 10:01 PM, Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com wrote:
The U.S. Gov't can't get it right!
Shame on them!
snip
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of David Crayford
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013
IBM: LookAt - z/OS message help -
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/
is the one working for me currently. That goes directly to the old, as-is
internet LookAt interface.
Can't speak for other pages that reference us.
Kevin Minerley
On 17 Dec 2013 08:16:49 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main Ed Jaffee
wrote:
Is BDT still needed for JES3 SNA NJE? Is it needed for JES3 TCP/IP if
there is such a thing?
Clark Morris
On 12/17/2013 6:30 AM, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
How would you deinstall (if it is the proper expression) software,
EJ's response hopefully does away vwith any need for such locutions as
'deinstall' and the more widely used (and offensive) Windows
'uninstall'. The antonyms 'enable' and 'disable' suffice here.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
On 12/18/2013 7:39 AM, Clark Morris wrote:
Is BDT still needed for JES3 SNA NJE? Is it needed for JES3 TCP/IP if
there is such a thing?
No BDT features are used for NJE over TCP/IP. It is a common,
JES-agnostic component (IAZ prefix).
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
Also, when pulling maint don't fill up PTS quite as fast for unused FMIDs
and associated HOLDDATA.
Have to be careful, some products like BDT and DCF(Script) have other
dependencies. Bookie will enable DCF even if it's not licensed to print the
DOCs.
In a message dated 12/18/2013 5:15:26
On 12/18/2013 10:10 AM, Mark Regan wrote:
While it is needed to give JES3 NJE over SNA, it is not needed for NJE over
TCPIP. Since my site has both flavors of JES, we were able to get rid of BDT by
routing all of our external business partner SNA/NJE connections through one of
our JES2
On 18 December 2013 14:02, Ed Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
Since JES2 comes included with the operating system for JES3 customers, I
set up a dummy JES2 node called FSNA (aka Free SNA, running as a
secondary subsystem) and routed all SNA/NJE traffic through there.
I'm not quite
Dana,
Documentation should be as good as the product , IMHO. But I know it's
difficult to cover everything in the manuals. My issue with some of the
documentation is good working examples. This I don't feel is impossible
especially with the guys at IBM. These folks usually are super good..
Hi list,
I'm confused - again. I thought I knew how APF authorization works with JOBLIB
statements but apparently I don't. Here's the background. I'm installing a
new maintenance level of SyncSort. According to the SyncSort manual, the only
library that needs APF authorization is the
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 23:06:40 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
Why is IDCAMS demanding that non-APF module SS14RC02 be loaded from an APF
authorized library?
I know this one! From MC:
17.21 CSV019I
CSV019I REQUESTED MODULE mod NOT ACCESSED, IS IN NON-APF
LIBRARY/CONCATENATION
I will answer the APF questions, but I strongly suggest that you call SyncSort
Support in the morning if you continue to have ABEND 306 problems.
The short answer is that any module loaded by an authorized program must come
from an authorized library. Loaded modules don't have to be authorized
On 18 Dec 2013 11:02:16 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On 12/18/2013 10:10 AM, Mark Regan wrote:
While it is needed to give JES3 NJE over SNA, it is not needed for NJE over
TCPIP. Since my site has both flavors of JES, we were able to get rid of BDT
by routing all of our external
On 12/18/2013 5:12 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
I wish I had thought of that back in the mid 1980s. The BDT
requirement was the final straw pushing my shop from JES3 to JES2
(single CPU shop). My division was sold by a company that was
predominantly JES3 to one that was predominantly JES2.
In
I'm confused - again. I thought I knew how APF authorization works
with JOBLIB statements but apparently I don't. Here's the
background. I'm installing a new maintenance level of SyncSort.
According to the SyncSort manual, the only library that needs APF
authorization is the SYNCAUTH
The new IBM knowledge center, which will replace Information Center, is
available for beta http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/. First
impressions are quite good. It's snappy, well laid out and allows
customers to add content. A quick look under the hood shows it's using
the dojo web
On 12/18/2013 7:58 PM, Blaicher, Christopher Y. wrote:
The short answer is that any module loaded by an authorized program
must come from an authorized library. Loaded modules don't have to
be authorized (AC=1), they just have to come from an authorized
library. Now it gets more complicated.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
A date for your diary in 2014!
The next GSE (UK) Enterprise Security Working Group meeting will take place on
Thursday 6th February at the Compuware Office in Maidenhead, UK.
The agenda and registration info will be made available in early January.
Please stay tuned to
24 matches
Mail list logo
