And if I were Emperor of the universe, I'd adjust the earth's orbit to
make sure it competed a revolution in exactly 365 days.
gary
On 2015-08-12 00:00, IBM-MAIN automatic digest system wrote:
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:19:38 -0500 From: Paul Gilmartin
paulgboul...@aim.com Subject: Leap (was:
https://share.confex.com/share/125/webprogram/Session17217.html
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On 08/11/2015 01:19 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:37:30 -0500, Joel Ewing wrote:
Encyclopedia Britannica is complicit in the confusion to this day by
incorrectly implying in their Leap Year entry that in addition to the
divisible by 4, 100, 400 rules there either is or
Why not 360? Or 512?
CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity
Original message
From: Gary Weinhold weinh...@dkl.com
Date: 08/12/2015 10:26 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 10 Aug 2015 to 11 Aug 2015 (#2015-223)
You say you want a (completed?) revolution? Oh yeah you know - we all want to
change the world ('s orbit?)
Chris hoelscher
Technology Architect
Database Infrastructure Services
Technology Solution Services
123 East Main Street
Louisville, KY 40202
choelsc...@humana.com
Humana.com
(502)
Did it get updated for 2.1?
In a message dated 8/12/2015 5:38:50 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
stars...@mindspring.com writes:
DAF is very good. Just feed it raw SMF and it will give you lots of
details.
it is found on www.cbttape.org.
This doesn't sound right. I was at the Interim Share in Phoenix in '81 in
May and it was rolling out then. Several luminaries in attendance. When we
landed it was 107 and got hotter every day!
In a message dated 8/12/2015 11:48:25 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
sfo...@sbcglobal.net writes:
However, when I started looking at the data returned from NOTE, I am
getting values of 1, 2, 3, etc. which doesn't quite jive with the
documentation (I can't believe everything is on track 0).
Mark,
According to the documentation here For a striped data set OPEN always
opens all volumes of a
On 12 Aug 2015 11:13:29 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
I recall a presentation by IBM Executives all those years back about the 'New
Era of Computing' (or something corny like that). One presenter mentioned that
there were other PCs around, but the IBM one had three things going for
The overt issue I am having is a S0C1 after doing a POINT macro when the
data is on the second volume of a multi-volume (BSAM) dataset. When I
first started looking at the issue, I read that an EXTENDED striped
dataset
would act as though it were on a single volume to the program. I would
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 19:05:20 -0300, Clark Morris wrote:
On 12 Aug 2015 11:08:19 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Leave it to the Republicans!
In the case below, the issue has nothing to do with any branch of the
United States of America Republican Party being French.
cf.:
gsg,
SMF record type 17 has the information you need. I believe even DAF reads
the SMF records. You can use the JCL shown here
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bit.listserv.ibm-main/bM8BCu8et7M/tw0dsBr7uVYJ
If you still need DAF you can get it here
DAF is very good. Just feed it raw SMF and it will give you lots of details.
it is found on www.cbttape.org.
You will either need the 60:69 if vsam or 17 if nonvsam
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: Sri h Kolusu skol...@us.ibm.com
Sent: Aug 12, 2015 3:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
I have not reassmebled it for 2.1 - but the records I am searching are fairly
stable.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: Ed Finnell 000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
Sent: Aug 12, 2015 3:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How to determine how a dataset got
Is there a way to determine how a specific dataset was deleted from the system?
We use to have a product called DCAF that we could use, but we no longer have
it.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
I'm not a big fan of the Irisch commands (OEDIT, OGET, etc.), but for the
problem at hand, OGETX with the SUFFIX() operand might be useful. All suffices
must be the same, and the remaining name must be a valid member name.
--
Peter Hunkeler
Hello,
I have 2 SMS SCDS's and need to know the differences between them.
Is there a way to compare them understandably? IDCAMS print produces a huge
amount of unusable output, SUPERC claims there are no differences, which is
incorrect.
Kees.
Hi Mainframe Professionals,
Good Day!
My question may be stupid, but I just wanna know this.
Is there any way to customize CA7 panels? i.e. can we change the options
for canceling or restarting or force completing the job to different panel
or different option?
Kindly let me know, whether it
Most of the ISMF options have a print feature. Build a comprehensive
listing for each SCDS and then run SUPERC against the listings.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Wednesday,
GIMUNZIP checks whether the dataset already exists. If it does, it reuses it.
If not, it creates it.
Regards and thanks
Paul
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 1:25 AM
Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM wrote:
I have 2 SMS SCDS's and need to know the differences between them.
Is there a way to compare them understandably? IDCAMS print produces a huge
amount of unusable output, SUPERC claims there are no differences, which is
incorrect.
Hmmm. Interesting. IDCAMS -
Rajesh Janakiraman wrote:
Is there any way to customize CA7 panels?
Did you RTFM? Did you contacted CA? These folks are very helpful according to
some IBM-MAIN followers.
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecth
--
For
There are differences and I want to see them all.
I also found the DCOLLECT option and I think I am going to try this.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: 12 August, 2015 11:08
To:
I know there are some on this list interested in and supporting CA ESP.
I have just added a request to enhance the way ESP (CA Workload Automation
ESP Edition) manages the parms for startup.
I would like some help in either making this a requirement or suggestions on
how it could be improved.
Hi Tom...
I have a question based on a comment you made to Itzchak. You said:
None specifically for the VS COBOL II modules. OTOH, when recompiling
with COBOL V5 we recommend a lot of testing, because it can reveal hidden=20
invalid COBOL programs. These programs could have been invalid for
Happy Birthday, IBM Personal Computer, August 12, 1981, the announcement date
for the original from IBM Boca Raton, Florida, birthplace of PC DOS and OS/2.
August 12 is also the birthday for MGM's release of The Wizard of OZ (1939)
and Edison's first phonograph in 1877 (Mary had a little
(Please don't post (or reply) with Subject: ... Digest)
On 2015-08-12, at 08:42, Charles Mills wrote:
Why not 360? Or 512?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Republican_Calendar
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
On 2015-08-12, at 08:07, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
On 8/12/2015 4:14 AM, Beesley, Paul wrote:
GIMUNZIP checks whether the dataset already exists. If it does, it
reuses it. If not, it creates it.
Yup, what he said.
Hmmm... Not so fast! I get the message when I specify replace=NO.
In that
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:19:04 -0500, Joel Ewing wrote:
365 31/128 is within one second of the mean tropical year; closer even
than the 4000-year rule.
Amazingly, if you do the math, the result of a 4/128 year rule is
mathematically identical to the average days/year of a
4/100/400/3200-year
On 2015-08-12, at 08:07, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
On 8/12/2015 4:14 AM, Beesley, Paul wrote:
GIMUNZIP checks whether the dataset already exists. If it does, it
reuses it. If not, it creates it.
Yup, what he said.
When I'm faced with that, I use DISP=(MOD,CATLG); FREE; then reallocate OLD.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Chris Hoelscher choelsc...@humana.com
wrote:
You say you want a (completed?) revolution? Oh yeah you know - we all want
to change the world ('s orbit?)
Not me! I would prefer to live in an advanced L5 arcology and just not
worry about silly Earth centrist
Tx Tom.
Is this (recompile) is sufficient for cobol ii under Cics 5.1?
ITschak
You do NOT have to recompile, you have to relink with REPLACE IGZEBST.
You could OPTIONALLY recompile with a newer compiler, which would use
a different bootstrap routine and eliminate the problem in a completely
In another thread, l...@garlic.com wrote:
... but then if MVS had FBA support wouldn't have needed to do 3380 as CKD
(even tho inherently it was FBA underneath) ...
I didn't know that.
Was that the first (and/or last?) IBM SLED to be inherently FBA under the hood?
Where were the smarts for
You will find this is not easy.
The SCDS holds lots of information. So a general request - what is
different, would be huge.
You might want to do smaller compares,
The ACS Code
The Dataclas, Mgtclas, Storclas, Stggroup, etc
Print listings and do compares
But at this time I do not know of
You might also want to join the CA COMMUNITIES on the support.ca.com website.
You will find a forum/community that discusses all things CA7. They could also
be helpful with this type of question.
So long as you have a CA Site number, it is free to join.
Lizette
-Original Message-
On 8/12/2015 4:14 AM, Beesley, Paul wrote:
GIMUNZIP checks whether the dataset already exists. If it does, it
reuses it. If not, it creates it.
Yup, what he said.
Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development
--
For IBM-MAIN
Leave it to the Republicans!
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 12:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Leap (was: LOADING An AMODE64 Program)
(Please
The important distinction of FBA is that block headers aren't rewritten when
the data is changed.
(Not counting when a low-level format is done, normally for the whole drive.)
I don't know the low-level details of the 3380 to know. It might be that the
32 byte
blocks are related to ECC, and
jcal...@narsil.org (Jerry Callen) writes:
In another thread, l...@garlic.com wrote:
... but then if MVS had FBA support wouldn't have needed to do 3380
as CKD (even tho inherently it was FBA underneath) ...
I didn't know that.
Was that the first (and/or last?) IBM SLED to be inherently
I recall a presentation by IBM Executives all those years back about the 'New
Era of Computing' (or something corny like that). One presenter mentioned that
there were other PCs around, but the IBM one had three things going for it over
the others:
I
B
M
And the PCs of this world still
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Aled Hughes
0050619ca8df-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
I recall a presentation by IBM Executives all those years back about the
'New Era of Computing' (or something corny like that). One presenter
mentioned that there were other PCs around, but the
On 08/12/2015 07:38 AM, Jerry Callen wrote:
In another thread, l...@garlic.com wrote:
... but then if MVS had FBA support wouldn't have needed to do 3380 as CKD
(even tho inherently it was FBA underneath) ...
I didn't know that.
Was that the first (and/or last?) IBM SLED to be
42 matches
Mail list logo
