Hi
would anyone know the RACF command syntax for a TSO id to be authorized to
use TESTAUTH
Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
Are you seeing an ICH408I Message or S913?
If not, is the TESTSAUTH in the IKJTSOxx member of parmlib?
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: michealbutz michealb...@comcast.net
Sent: Aug 15, 2015 7:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: RACF syntax to permit TSO user to use TESTAUTH
Tom,
I think (I wrote the requirement), I was the one that requested
SMPE to create the forfmid at SHARE way long time ago. I was having
issues with stringing out the ptfs, mine got to 3 continuation
cards . It was for an obscure product that I dearly loved.
Ed
On Aug 15, 2015, at 5:45
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 23:12:04 +0530, Nathan Astle wrote:
Should I be looking into the PE or HIPER for z/OS ? If so what should be
looking into it especially?
Yes.
You should apply the maintenance that is available, using your standard
methodology.
Everyone has different preferences, but IMO
PERMIT TESTAUTH CLASS(TSOAUTH) ID(TSOID)
ACC(upd)
Sorry someone let me know
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 15, 2015, at 11:28 PM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
Are you seeing an ICH408I Message or S913?
If not, is the TESTSAUTH in the IKJTSOxx member of parmlib?
Lizette
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net (Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.) writes:
I'm editing the wikipedia article on Count Key Data, and I've run into
an editorial dispute. I claim that what is now ECKD was part of the
SMB, and the other editor claims that you could run 3380 on a slow
channel without using,
Hi
Should I be looking into the PE or HIPER for z/OS ? If so what should be
looking into it especially?
Nathan
On Saturday 15 August 2015, David Purdy
00ac4b1d56b3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
Everything is well documented. One overlooked documented item was the
return code
Review and attend to the Migration Guide Notes.
They are very very helpful.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of David Purdy
Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2015 10:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
Thanks Lizette.
The double * must be new (within the last 25 years :-) ).
Back in the day only a single * could be used to replace a single qualifier.
It was great for GDSs (ie. HLQ.GDGBASE.*).
Dan D
-Original Message-
From: Lizette Koehler
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 7:27 PM
As a takeoff on this what is the easiest way to rename hlqold.*.** to
hlqnew.*.**
In most cases vsam files aren't in the mix.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
Original message
From: DanD mvs-j...@sympatico.ca
Date: 08/15/2015 9:58 AM (GMT-05:00)
To:
Everything is well documented. One overlooked documented item was the return
code change from LISTCAT of a GDG base with no entries. V1R13 gave RC = 4. V2R1
RC = 0. Documented workaround as well.
David
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Astle tcpipat...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN
Hi
We are upgrading our operating system from 1.13 to 2.1.
So apart from toleration maintenance are there any other Things to be
looked from the OS perspective?
Would somebody share the steps taken at your shop ?
Nathan
--
Check with your ISV vendors
Extremely valuable information provided by Marna Walle on migration to 2.1
Check the IBM site migration and installation planning manuals
Check for coexistence maintenance DB2, CICS, etc...
Rum SMPE FIXCAT reports
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 15, 2015, at 11:52
The only major change we had to do in my previous shop was to migrate from
BPX.DEFAULT.USER to BPX.UNIQUE.USER in order to migrate RACF AIM stage to 3.
This is very well described in the manual I've shown in my previous note.
If by easiest you mean least human activity, DFSMSdss can replace the HLQ as
part of a copy.
If by easiest you mean least CPU activity, then a simple CLIST or REXX you
invoke from a 3.4 dataset list might be suitable.
Neither approach will handle archived or tape datasets well. Both can
handle
Hello Nathan,
You might want to take a look at z/OS Migration - GA32-0889-04 manual =
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/e0z3m104.pdf .
Other very helpful manuals can be found in the same IBM site:
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/v2r1pdf
Regards,
Lizzette:
With OS upgrades I pretty much follow you.
What seems to be lost in the haze is when you have major upgrades
(like COBOL or LE). With those two I will take exception.
15 or 20 years ago we had gone through the upgrade. After the upgrade
(with a LOT of battle wounds) I swear IBM
17 matches
Mail list logo
