On Sat, 12 Sep 2015, at 16:42, Roland Kinsman wrote:
> Point taken, Peter. Here are the messages that led me to this
> conclusion:
>
> IEW4000I FETCH FOR MODULE CWPZDRVR FROM DDNAME -LNKLST- FAILED BECAUSE
> INSUFFICIENT STORAGE WAS AVAILABLE.
> CSV031I LIBRARY ACCESS FAILED FOR MODULE
Roger,
My plans exactly.
Regards,
Scott
On Saturday, September 12, 2015, Roger Bolan wrote:
> My suggestion, as someone who has converted application programs to SMP/E
> packaging in the past, is to be sure allocate your own CSI sandbox, with
> your own zones,
>However, since you are running them using TSO CALL command, your programs are
>already being ATTACHed. Therefore using ATTACHMVS would not give any added
>benefit in terms of storage cleanup. I think you'll need to get a dump and
>figure out what storage isn't being freed.
Storage is very
t...@harminc.net (Tony Harminc) writes:
> In my experience, though, Windows was not generally included in what
> people meant by "open systems"; they meant UNIX, and if they failed to
> include z/OS (or OS/390) UNIX, it's because they were unaware of its
> existence. If they wanted to include
My suggestion, as someone who has converted application programs to SMP/E
packaging in the past, is to be sure allocate your own CSI sandbox, with
your own zones, distribution libraries, and target libraries, where you can
play, experiment, and test without affecting anyone else on the system.
In <55f30e5c.4000...@copper.net>, on 09/11/2015
at 01:24 PM, Steve Thompson said:
>What you looking for is "Writing an Exit for the SUBMIT Command".
>Then look for "Summary of using the bytes of word 5"
>After you do this, if you are familiar with C/I, could you say with
In <55f2ee76.4040...@us.ibm.com>, on 09/11/2015
at 11:08 AM, Kurt Quackenbush said:
>You can greatly simplify you and your customers' efforts if you can
>avoid MODs and JCLIN altogether.
BTDT,GTS. Level sets are evil. If a fix changes only one csect then
the PTF should
In <55f27b68.6070...@gmail.com>, on 09/11/2015
at 02:57 PM, David Crayford said:
>Yes, I understand that. But wouldn't cat "//'SYS1.SAMPLIB(GIMSAMPU)'"
>| sed have worked?
What about sed <"//'SYS1.SAMPLIB(GIMSAMPU)'"?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and
In , on 09/12/2015
at 09:58 PM, Peter Hunkeler said:
>Storage is very often obtained in subpool 0, and this subpool is
>owned by the job step task.
Isn't there an SZERO=NO?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position;
On 9/11/2015 11:21 AM, J O Skip Robinson wrote:
Thanks to Jim for both answers. I opted for the second choice--add exit to
LPA--because it seems a lot simpler, but it's nice to know that there exists a
bouncing ball method as well. I doubt that there's enough demand for this sort
of thing to
Point taken, Peter. Here are the messages that led me to this conclusion:
IEW4000I FETCH FOR MODULE CWPZDRVR FROM DDNAME -LNKLST- FAILED BECAUSE
INSUFFICIENT STORAGE WAS AVAILABLE.
CSV031I LIBRARY ACCESS FAILED FOR MODULE CWPZDRVR, RETURN CODE 24, REASON CODE
26080021, DDNAME *LNKLST*
z/OS has no hardware limitations?
I guess IBM's new customer agreements as to what can run on IIPs and AAPs and
IFLs, their prohibition of running z/OS on Hercules, and their purchase of
Platform Solutions Inc. (PSI) to avoid a court decision regarding the use of
commodity chips such as
All,
I am pleased to announce the agenda for the Virtual GSE UK - Large Systems
Event.
Full details can be seen here:
http://lsx.gse.org.uk/content/content_news.php
Mark
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
I suggest that posters remember that mentioning an abend code without the
associated reason code (when there is one, or reg 15) can be close to
useless. This is especially true for completion codes such as 0E0.
If that info is not directly available, then perhaps a question can be
"how do I
14 matches
Mail list logo