Dear list:
I'd like to know if there is a sample (source code) in order to
develop a capture point for applications which open and control session
with SNA printers (LU1 or LU3).
We are starting a project to develop this function and as a good
start we just need some tips to code an
I put this question to a SHARE buddy who has a lot more experience in the area
than I do. He strongly recommended a PDSE-2 if at all possible in order to
avoid limitations in the original, venerable design of PDSE.
.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team
This is a typical CICS tuning opportunity. What to keep and what to make
pageable are very installation dependent. If there are vendors they should be
able to provide guidance.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGMCP_5.1.0/com.ibm.cics.ts.app
W dniu 2016-05-02 o 22:48, Chuck Kreiter pisze:
VIO might not be an option as the dataset is 1400 cylinders.
Wild question: Is it absolutely necessary to work with *all* the members?
I can imagine "the bes of" library created just for the job. It can be
PDSE or VIO (not both), or something
VIO might not be an option as the dataset is 1400 cylinders.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ron Hawkins
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2016 2:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PDS I/O Performance Improvement
Boy this takes me back - to the Summer of 1990. :-)
At the time what I call "The Coffee Table Book" aka the Data In Memory
Performance Studies WSC Orange Book was freshish out.
One of the studies was VIO to Expanded Storage. It showed CPU cost across
the range of data set sizes, relative to
Radoslaw,
For z/TPF I cannot share what we pay, but believe me $/MSU is much, much,
much higher than z/OS.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 12:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Skip,
VIO is still a great way to handle small, temp data sets. I've used the method
mentioned below where VLF was no help, and LLA Freeze a hindrance, and it works
surprisingly well. At less than 1Mb per CYL it’s far from being expensive. Then
again, I was a big fan of VFETCH too... Not
What parameters were on the IEAMSCHD macros for the two SRB's? If the
LLOCK=YES parm is set on both, then there is your problem.
Can you send what the IEAMSCHD macros look like?
Chris Blaicher
Technical Architect
Mainframe Development
Syncsort Incorporated
50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ
On the zIIP point assume most of DB2 DBM1 in V10 and nearly all in V11 is
zIIP-eligible. (And, yes, SMF 30 gives you the actual numbers.)
And thereby hangs another tale... :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM
My situation is I paused a global (non preemptable) SRB then another address
space
schedules a global SRB in that same address space where the scope=global non
preemptable SRB called IEAVPSE2
Will the second take off it doesn't seem like it did
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 2, 2016, at
Caveat: as a daily digester, responses are implicitly delayed...
Tracy: among other good advice you got, I'll emphasize that the Importance for
your Databases (DB2, etc) must be higher than your Applications (Cics, etc) to
avoid [some of] these time-out/deadlock scenarios. I strongly suggest
IF SRB #1 that is non-preemptable schedules SRB #2 and then does a PAUSE, SRB
#2 can still be dispatched.
Sorry if I wasn't clear. SRB #1 can't be interrupted to dispatch other work on
the processor it is running on, but that doesn't mean nothing else can run.
Also, if it stops itself, the
Thanks all.
My 64-bit to 31-bit shim assembles just peachy but the linker thinks
it's a 31-bit animal.
Is there something other than AMODE 64 to tell the linker "yes, this
really is AMODE(64)"?
Does it matter of it's driven from USS instead of batch?
Thanks.
-- R; <><
On 04/27/16
Yes. It wasn't pre-empted, it paused.
Chris Blaicher
Technical Architect
Mainframe Development
Syncsort Incorporated
50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677
P: 201-930-8234 | M: 512-627-3803
E: cblaic...@syncsort.com
www.syncsort.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 10:38 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: OA49446 on RSU1603 - RACF / DFSMS change
>
> I have no experience with the PTF
I have no experience with the PTF in action. I saw it during APPLY CHECK and
decided immediately that I would EXCLUDE it in the real APPLY--which has not
happened yet. I think we need some clarification from the RACF folks...
.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric
Robert,
I tried out your recommendation but the member gets overriden. Below is the
display of the dsn"
Data set name ===> 'SYS2.BATCH.JOBS.OUTPUT'
Member to use ===> JOB03070
Disposition===> SHR(OLD,
Maybe put Year in DSN, member name would include Month 1-9,A,B,C, Day
01-31, Time -2359, or Day of Year 001-366, Time -2359.
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Pedro Vera wrote:
>>> Is there something I could do to prevent this from happening?
>
> I think JES2 can be
>> Is there something I could do to prevent this from happening?
I think JES2 can be customized to use seven digit numbers for the job number.
On my site, the jobs numbers look like J1234567. That is, you cannot prevent
the collision in job numbers, but you can lessen the frequency.
If I
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-02/inside-the-secret-meeting-where-wall-street-tested-digital-cash
Them seem to forget that the zSystem can do Blockchain too.
http://www.ibmsystemsmag.com/mainframe/trends/IBM-Announcements/z-Systems_LinuxONE_Blockchain/
>From the Bloomberg
What I have generally found on transition projects is that people can be on any
point of the spectrum. Enter one of these projects with your eyes open.
Dennis Roach, CISSP, PMP
IAM Access Administration – Consumer – Senior Analyst
2929 Allen Parkway, America Building, 3rd Floor, Houston, TX
On 5/2/2016 10:28 AM, Roach, Dennis wrote:
It can go both ways. I did a decommission gig where my job was to keep an
unsupported z/OS 1.7 system up and running, assist with transition, and provide
reporting of what was still running. The main reason I was brought in was to
allow the existing
It can go both ways. I did a decommission gig where my job was to keep an
unsupported z/OS 1.7 system up and running, assist with transition, and provide
reporting of what was still running. The main reason I was brought in was to
allow the existing staff to transition to new positions within
Thanks. I will check in to see if that is an option.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ron Burr
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2016 7:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PDS I/O Performance Improvement
I haven't
25 matches
Mail list logo