Deleting MFS

2017-01-23 Thread Mosley, George
Hello. Does anyone know how to delete MFS objects from the IMS FORMAT library when a transaction retires? Thanks. George Mosley ICBC 433-151 West Esplanade St North Vancouver, BC Canada V7M 3H9 604 982-7327 This email and any attachments are intended only for

Re: Subsystem function code 16, 17, 18, and 19

2017-01-23 Thread esst...@juno.com
These function calls were briefly discussed in gg66-3131 "The Subsystem Interface in MVS/SP Version 3" I have never seen these function codes (6, 17, 18, 19) documented anywhere else. Good luck trying to find a copy. -- Original Message -- From: Chip Grantham

Re: HMC Mail domain

2017-01-23 Thread retired mainframer
Can't spammers bypass this check by just faking a real domain name in the FROM: field, something like s...@gmail.com? > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of David Boyes > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 6:20 AM > To:

AW: Re: IBM DS8870 3390 EAV and DSCB format 9

2017-01-23 Thread Peter Hunkeler
> Peter, do you think that if I did a DFDSS DUMP with DELETE PURGE against > Steve file and then DFDSS RESTORE, > ISPF I for that restored file (i'm assuming to also an EAV dasd volume) > ?will be different = not showing job and step names ?? >From what I have read this may be. It depends on

Re: IBM DS8870 3390 EAV and DSCB format 9

2017-01-23 Thread Toni Cecil
Hi Peter and Steve, many thx for your posts. Peter, do you think that if I did a DFDSS DUMP with DELETE PURGE against Steve file and then DFDSS RESTORE, ISPF I for that restored file (i'm assuming to also an EAV dasd volume) will be different = not showing job and step names ?? Regards,

Re: HMC Mail domain

2017-01-23 Thread Rick Troth
Seconding what David said. And the beauty here is that this doesn't break anything and doesn't expose you to risk. On 01/23/17 09:20, David Boyes wrote: I don't understand, do you mean add another MX and A record at the company site domain server, In yours. The root problem is actually a

Re: IBM DS8870 3390 EAV and DSCB format 9

2017-01-23 Thread Steve Smith
ISPF I: Data Set Name . . . . : MHEAV.DUMP.CAT17181.TRS General Data Current Allocation Management class . . : **None**Allocated cylinders : 173 Storage class . . . : **None**Allocated extents . : 1 Volume serial . . . : EAVNS0 Device type . . . .

Re: REXX (was How to calculate the JES2 Checkpoint and Spool Space)

2017-01-23 Thread Steve Smith
Well, REXX goes its own way... I was trying to figure out how to parse "not 4k", and fortunately, just read to the end before investing time in research. Working with both REXX and C, the /, %, and // operators give me a headache. sas On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Robert Prins

AW: IBM DS8870 3390 EAV and DSCB format 9

2017-01-23 Thread Peter Hunkeler
> - I've no EAVs defined so far but dscb format 9 has available new fields > like jobname, stepname for each dataset created on a EAV dasd volume. I don't have access to EAV volumes here, so I cannot verify what I'm writing below. I'm sure someone who can will correct me shuold I be wrong.

HMC Mail domain

2017-01-23 Thread David Boyes
>I don't understand, do you mean >add another MX and A record at >the company site domain server, In yours. The root problem is actually a good thing - modern mail systems require that the sending domain name actually resolve to something to prevent spammers. Otherwise, the SMTP protocol

Re: How to calculate the JES2 Checkpoint and Spool Space

2017-01-23 Thread Robert Prins
On 2017-01-23 00:13, Dale R. Smith wrote: On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 15:00:08 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote: Please note that "variables" like "!4k" start with an exclamation point (!). I would have liked to use just "4k", but REXX does not allow "variable" names that start

Re: DFDSS DUMP ADR497E RC246 REAS HA-004

2017-01-23 Thread Toni Cecil
Hi all, first of all many thx for your suggestions, here is what probably happened: - one of my team mates is moving some old DS83K dasd volumes using TDMF to a new DS8870 and one of the usercats that was opened was also moved (he didn't noticed). So, catalog address space had the old UCAT