Hi Folks,
Lionel Dyck posed the question of how you can determine which of
your disk packs have IPL text on them, and what IPL text do they have?
Lionel solved his own problem (with Bob Richards' help). Please see
his exec called IPLCHK on CBT File 312 on the UPDATES page. If you
I wrap my lm+ with REXX reading the mod and VER doing the proper math and
rr-writing it.
-teD
Original Message
From: Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2018 21:47
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Running ISPF's 3.5 utility from a
On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 20:03:04 -0500, Steve Horein wrote:
>+1 for LMMSTATS
>
Depends. For in-house operations, whatever works and is most convenient,
such as cbttape.org.
For code distributed to customers, stay with standard facilities, such as
LMMSTATS.
-- gil
Unless something has changed recently, after all these decades of built-in
level management, V01.M99 does not automatically roll over to V02. 01.99 gets
stuck forever unless manually updated.
Furthermore, users must take care to let ISPF handle incrementing properly. Too
often I see a user
+1 for LMMSTATS
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:24 PM Jim Ruddy wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Do you have the stats already from the generation of the members? Maybe I
> am missing something but is there a re reason you cannot use LMMSTATS to
> set the statistics for each member?
>
> Jim Ruddy
> Retired
>
> On
Kees Vernooij wrote:
>Some VTL's (a.o. TS77xx) have a backend tapelibrary
>with physical tapes. They need to be erased too.
>When we dismissed our STK tapelibrary, we hired a
>degausser to erase the data on the tapes.
FYI, modern tape media, including all IBM 3592 series, have prerecorded
servo
Phil,
My issue with cloud computing and multiple z/OS it’s not structured
financially for small ISVs like us.
Cost is a big issue with us..
Scott
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 1:22 PM Phil Smith III wrote:
> OK, so what do we mean by "cloud"? What *customers* seem to mean is "a
> compute platform
On 9/15/2018 6:02 PM, David Cole wrote:
At 9/14/2018 12:18 PM, Tom Conley wrote:
On 9/14/2018 11:50 AM, David Cole wrote:
I would like to generate ISPF statistics for members of a PDS whose
members I am creating outside of any ISPF tool. I would like to find
a way to generate ISPF stats for
Thank you to Tom, Dana, John and Steve, all of whom came up with the
"right" answer (i.e. the answer I was looking for). Yes, the ancient
PDS command does exactly what I want...
1) I don't have to write my own utility.
2) I can run it in the batch under the TMP.
3) It has an ATTR membersref
At 9/14/2018 12:18 PM, Tom Conley wrote:
On 9/14/2018 11:50 AM, David Cole wrote:
I would like to generate ISPF statistics for members of a PDS whose
members I am creating outside of any ISPF tool. I would like to
find a way to generate ISPF stats for such members.
It occurs to me that one way
OK, so what do we mean by "cloud"? What *customers* seem to mean is "a compute
platform where I can run my stuff but not have to deal with buying hardware and
racking and cabling it and in general all the work of running a data center".
By which definition, of course, traditional timesharing
Will your Z110S and Z210M systems run simultaneously in different LPARs? If
so, then you do not want to copy the catalog entry. This will cause both
systems to try to use the same page dataset on the same volume. In this case
you need to define new page datasets for Z210M. See the "DEFINE
FWIW SPAM mail can be sent to https://www.spamcop.net/ with a copy sent
also to the spammer's email domain administrator (provided the
abuse@ email ID is keyed into spamcop's spare 'copy-to' box
that is).
The spammer's email domain is the one following the '@' sign. The
'report abuse to
johnny,
I'm going on the assumption that PAGE.PLPA.PAGE doesn't exist and copying a
non-existent catalog entry isn't going to work. Skip gave sample IDCAMS
statement to define a PAGESPACE, so use it to define your PLPA, COMMON, and
PAGE datasets - use different names than the system on which
https://model9.io/about-us/company/
i...@model9.io
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 4:30 PM Arthur wrote:
> On 14 Sep 2018 03:50:14 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
> (Message-ID:<7316854461517568.wa.giliadwyahoo@listserv.ua.edu>)
> 00d50942efa9-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Giliad
> Wilf)
"Usually" is slippery. When you need it, it's important.
And if someone truly needs it, then they should make a business case and
submit an RFE for it.
> and even a bad idea to save UTC time, as opposed to saving the
>STCK(E) value.
>
Why?
Perhaps because of the lack of processing of
this is wat i'm getting in my screen while loading
IEA247I USING IEASYS21 FOR z/OS 02.01.00 HBB7790
ISG313I SYSTEM IS INITIALIZING IN GRS NONE MODE. RING OR STAR
CONFIGURATION
KEYWORDS IN GRSCNF00 ARE IGNORED.
IEA920I PAGE DATA SET PAGE.PLPA.PAGE
NOT LOCATED
IEA922D REPLY
I used todd's jcl and it ran fine but still getting same issue .
REPRO INDATASET(CATALOG.Z110S.MASTER) -
00210004
OUTDATASET(CATALOG.Z210M.MASTER) -
00220004
LEVEL(SYS1.PLPA.PAGE)-
00221004
MERGECAT
00222004
IDC01460I THE NUMBER OF ENTRIES MERGED WAS
On 14/09/2018 9:21 PM, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:28:09 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
Wow, that's interesting! It runs in 1.861138 cpu seconds on our z13s. We
have 800mips sliced up between 3 cores so 266mips per core.
What model is that? How severely is it kneecapped?
We're
On 15/09/2018 4:29 AM, scott Ford wrote:
Jerry,
I agree, but zConnect EE was pricy like MQ..it’s hard to sell a product
that will cost a customer more to install.
Why do you need to use z/OS Connect? If all you need is a Java
Application Server, which is essentially what z/OS Connect is,
20 matches
Mail list logo
