You can make it more efficient to split the weekfile, while building it, into
separate files per subject: I/O, DB2, MQ, Monitors etc.
You hardly need data from all area's.
If you add data in the correct order, you can use DFsort to select data until
Date > Dayn.
Kees.
> -Original
Hi Steely (or is it Mark)?
But I don't know which volumes have the data specific to those dates; wouldn't
CA-1 or OAM complain saying it doesn't have the full list of volumes associated
with that tape file?
- Vignesh
Mainframe Infrastructure
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Hi Scott,
"An alternative may be to create/maintain an SMS-managed, short-lived (consider
zEDC for efficiency) WEEKLY GDG (sorted or at least consider DD GDGORDER=FIFO
parameter)."
The weekly GDGs I have are already sorted in order, so was wondering if
IFASMFDP efficiently cuts off
Hello David,
I am unable to understand this config. Can you please help me to mke sense
out of below line code.
daemon.err;*.SYSLOGD*.*.none;*.INETD*.*.none /var/log/daemon -N
DAEMON(+1)
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:08 PM Jousma, David <
01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
Hi Tom,
Apology for the typo the module name is ITVDIV
On Tue 4 Dec, 2018, 9:26 PM Tom Marchant <
000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 20:59:42 +0400, Jake Anderson wrote:
>
> >Ofcourse search ended up showing the error for return code 220 but the
>
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 23:48:12 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>
>I'm not aware that IEBGENER itself ever changed. You either kept the classic
>version or played the alias game. The app we shot in the foot counted on
>IEBGENER default behavior by hardcoding I/P block size later on for the same
In the beginning, IEBGENER did not itself change. IBM recommended replacing it
with a copy of ICEGENER aliased to IEBGENER so that SDB would be in effect
without anyone having to change JCL. That's what we did but accidentally messed
up the wacko application that was depending totally on the
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 21:09:37 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>When my home shop of that long ago the day 'converted' to SDB, we stumbled on
>a (screwball) app that routinely created a file using--depending
>on!--IEBGENER's practice of duplicating input DCB attributes to output,
>complete with
I am adding this to code that is already using the DSCB chain for all of
the volumes for a dataset. Getting information from these to allocate a
"LIKE" dataset is the problem - there seem more than a few complexities and
pitfalls.
I am really just looking for an example of something that
LISTDSI would be my first choice. It does not require ISPF or any other
'product'. However, it is a TSO/E function, so you have to run under IKJEFTxx.
You can retrieve pretty much any attribute of an existing DASD-resident data
set and use the info to create a similar file.
.
.
J.O.Skip
When my home shop of that long ago the day 'converted' to SDB, we stumbled on a
(screwball) app that routinely created a file using--depending on!--IEBGENER's
practice of duplicating input DCB attributes to output, complete with the
boiler plate warning to that effect. The real mischief was
On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 19:20:07 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>I believe that he's using a different meaning of client, e.g., customer.
>
>IND$FILE, SFTP and WSA are all easier to use for people who are not at home
>with the Eunix utilities.
>
My favorite approach has been NFS. It puts my z/OS data
Is Rexx suitable. Perhaps LISTDSI can help
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Kirk Wolf
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2018 2:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Examples of roll your own "LIKE()"
No; you get the extents as allocated, not as requested. Then there's the EAV
issue.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin
On 12/4/2018 12:42 PM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
Are there examples in CBT of code that do similar analysis of DASD
datasets? Even something that does a good job at deducing
SPACE=(unit,(pri,sec)) is not as simple as one might think.
For standalone code, a RDJFCB will get you a list of the
If you have it, $RSVP might meet your needs
Chris Hoelscher
Technology Architect, Database Infrastructure Services
Technology Solution Services
Humana Inc.
123 East Main Street
Louisville, KY 40202
Humana.com
(502) 476-2538 or 407-7266
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
Thanks everyone for the suggestions.
For my purposes, I can't run under ISPF or require a licensed product.
I took a brief at look at the CBT VTOC command, but it just seems to print
a VTOC without much attention to the issues surrounding how to extract a
"LIKE()" allocation.
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 11:41:43 -0600, Kirk Wolf wrote:
>
>Are there examples in CBT of code that do similar analysis of DASD
>datasets? Even something that does a good job at deducing
>SPACE=(unit,(pri,sec)) is not as simple as one might think.
>
AVGREC adds to the chaos.
If the initial allocation
Kirk - here is a routine from PDSEGEN that will do some of what you want
Do_Model: Expose pdsedsn zdsngen null zcmd
'dsinfo dataset('pdsedsn')'
if words(zcmd) = 2 then mdsn = word(zcmd,2)
else mdsn = pdsedsn
newgen = zdsngen
munit = left(zdsspc,1)
dsnt =
I think you can specify the volsers you just want to read --
VOL=SER=(UC4622,UI0455).
This may cause an error but you will have the data needed .
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Tuesday,
Hi Kirk,
File 112 ... the VTOC Command.
Regards,
David
On 2018-12-04 12:41, Kirk Wolf wrote:
> I need to be able to reverse engineer the allocation of cataloged DSORG=PS
> data sets by looking at the DSCBs and catalog.
>
> To be specific, I would like to generate BPXWDYN allocation keywords for
Don't suppose you have Innovation Data Processing's FDREPORT?
If you did, you could set up a job to select data sets based on your
requirements, and tell FDREPORT to generate JCL or ALLOCATE
statements, using the DCB and space allocation information that
FDREPORT gathers.
-Original
I need to be able to reverse engineer the allocation of cataloged DSORG=PS
data sets by looking at the DSCBs and catalog.
To be specific, I would like to generate BPXWDYN allocation keywords for an
existing cataloged DSORG=PS data set to that I can use allocate a new data
set LIKE() it on another
Hi,
I'd have to agree. Management of dataset and volume backups and dumps is tricky
without HSM taking care of it by writing to tape, either real or virtual,
quickly becoming a management overhead - though it did say "almost all".
thanks,
Simon Wheeler
-Original Message-
From:
In my opinion, you can not do much using IFASMFDP. Fairly stable (can you say
no real enhancement potential).
You could look at using LOGSTREAM for SMF Data (which I am told is nicer) -
Logstream provides a possibility of better search criteria.
>From my experience, when you have HUGE SMF files
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 20:59:42 +0400, Jake Anderson wrote:
>Ofcourse search ended up showing the error for return code 220 but the
>failing module was different in IBM manual in my case it was ITODIV from
>sys1.lpalib.
I've never heard of that module. I don't believe it is an IBM module.
You might
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:45:26 +, Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh
wrote:
>Hello!
>
>Say there's a file called SMF.WEEKLY and it is a huge, multi-volume file, and
>is an aggregate of all SMF.DAILY files (data is sequential).
>If I want to pick out data from just the first day of the week from
Hi Liz,
Ofcourse search ended up showing the error for return code 220 but the
failing module was different in IBM manual in my case it was ITODIV from
sys1.lpalib. I was curious about the diagnostic code 231.
Finally figured out the vsam files were not copied properly and this caused
this error
Hello!
Say there's a file called SMF.WEEKLY and it is a huge, multi-volume file, and
is an aggregate of all SMF.DAILY files (data is sequential).
If I want to pick out data from just the first day of the week from SMF.WEEKLY,
using IFASMFDP, apart from specifying DATE(yyddd,yyddd), is there a
Years of rules enforced by tape management systems, extensive GDG use and "If
you don't use catalog control, you get what you deserve" made this possible.
I don't remember the SMS rules, but I'm pretty sure they required SL and
catalog control. First passes didn't get all of them, but tape
(Let me know if there is a better listserv to send this to...)
Howdy,
I'm trying to activate forced secure connection to the management interface of
our TS77xx VTLs for managed services access we're adding. The shipped cert of
CN:www.ibm.com loads as "CA root not trusted". I know I can add a
On 12/02/2018 07:55 PM, Rugen, Len wrote:
> Batch tape should be dead, even if batch JCL still looks like tape is used.
> One of my last SMS projects was to manage tape, redirecting almost all to SMS
> disk.
>
>
>
Before employing any technique to convert all tape data sets to DASD,
one
There is the IBM MVS Messages and Codes manual and the VSAM Demystified REDBOOK
that could assist with this issue.
Did you do any searches on the message? Did you follow the suggestion in
IEC251I to review IEC161I message as well.
In the job's output, did you look for other messages that
Here is what we code. You have to add offload info for every SYSLOGD stream
you are writing or it wont offload it.
ArchiveTimeOfDay 00:01
BeginArchiveParms
DSNPrefix TEMPG.PDP.SYSLOGD.
Unit SYSDA
nmo no .. man .. i really dont know.. if u can tell me its ur wish.. cant
force u
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 11:55 AM Jake Anderson
wrote:
> You must be knowing already right ...
>
>
> Or else feeling restless to know ?
>
> On Tue 4 Dec, 2018, 12:44 PM saurabh khandelwal <
>
Apology.. it was supposed to be offline response ..
Please ignore it
On Tue 4 Dec, 2018, 12:55 PM Jake Anderson You must be knowing already right ...
>
>
> Or else feeling restless to know ?
>
> On Tue 4 Dec, 2018, 12:44 PM saurabh khandelwal <
> sourabhkhandelwal...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>
You must be knowing already right ...
Or else feeling restless to know ?
On Tue 4 Dec, 2018, 12:44 PM saurabh khandelwal <
sourabhkhandelwal...@gmail.com wrote:
> where r u these days ...
>
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:51 AM Jake Anderson
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I am getting IEC251I
where r u these days ...
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:51 AM Jake Anderson
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am getting IEC251I 220-231,JOBNAME,JOBNAME
>
> Can someone help me to point with the manual for the above error ?
>
> Jake
>
> --
> For
38 matches
Mail list logo
