On 1/4/2019 9:19 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
Stepping aside from what Zowe the architecture consists of, could we at least
agree up front how to say it? (The confusion over 'Linux' went on way too long.)
When Zowe was introduced to SHARE in St. Louis, the authors allowed that they
wanted a
On 1/4/2019 9:20 PM, Brian Westerman wrote:
I don't share the ECBLIST between the main and subtask, so I'm not sure what
happens if you do
You get a 301 abend if ever two TCBs WAIT on the same event.
--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA
When you test the ECB is anything being posted? Is it possible that your
subtasks are actually sharing the ECBLIST for other use and they are clearing
it for you?
It would be interesting to have all of your tasks (main and sub) wto when they
are posted so that you can see where you are when
The mainframe is the MMORPG and each CICS region is a different server instance.
From: "Schuffenhauer, Mark"
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 14:41
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Zowe?
Depends on if they have server experience beyond Windows, then there
Tom and I grappled with a menagerie of system exits that had been adopted and
adapted by SCE during the 70s (?) and 80s. Exit code had been tweaked to some
extent to fit installation standards, but likewise standards had been shaped to
some extent by the way exits worked. Today when I get
I have met people with that name, but pronounced zo-ee, as in Zowie Bowie.
Ron Hawkins
Director, Ipsicsopt Pty Ltd (ACN: 627 705 971) | m: +61 400029610 | h: +61
387399252 | email: ronjhawki...@gmail.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jesse 1
Stepping aside from what Zowe the architecture consists of, could we at least
agree up front how to say it? (The confusion over 'Linux' went on way too
long.)
When Zowe was introduced to SHARE in St. Louis, the authors allowed that they
wanted a homophone of the given name Zoe, but that
Mark,
Absolutely, especially if one has has Unix and Linux exposure compared to
Windoze.
Scott
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 4:41 PM Schuffenhauer, Mark
wrote:
> Depends on if they have server experience beyond Windows, then there can
> be a frame of reference. Otherwise, I prefer to use an
sme...@gmu.edu (Seymour J Metz) writes:
> I would have loved to see an enhanced SNA with internetworking and
> DNS, but when CCITT refused to look at it, that wasn't an option.
>
> If the major TCP-based protocols at least switched to SCTP, that would
> be an improvement.
re:
Depends on if they have server experience beyond Windows, then there can be a
frame of reference. Otherwise, I prefer to use an example based on playing
multi-player console/PC games. You can go local or remote, it doesn't matter,
but how can one box have 4 people play at once? How can the
I would have loved to see an enhanced SNA with internetworking and DNS, but
when CCITT refused to look at it, that wasn't an option.
If the major TCP-based protocols at least switched to SCTP, that would be an
improvement.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
Peter,
So how does a Cobol Pam , 31bit address say a Hiperspace ?
I assume an interface program units AR registers , etc., am I correct ?
I have don’t this want to...
Scott
IDMWORKS
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 8:46 AM Peter Relson wrote:
> From the LE team:
>
> fetch() will indeed reject loading
R.S., boy can I related to that..CICS is a foreign concept to PC people
because of their experience and frame of reference.
Scott
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 4:02 PM R.S. wrote:
> W dniu 2019-01-04 o 18:31, Phil Smith III pisze:
> > A colleague asked me, "WTF really *is* Zowe?" and the only answer
I currently have 6 production, 1 test, and 1 sandbox LPARs sharing a RMM
environment.
I have SYSID as the SMFID of each LPAR.
I have CDSID as a generic name. We created the system with all 6 LPARs when we
installed RMM. Based upon this, I would say you need to keep CDSID(SYSA).
Also, we
Hi,
Sorry to hear that you feel this way. Our desire is to balance providing
leading edge solutions while meeting our clients' needs for base functionality.
Recently, the z/OS team switched to using RFE so that we can better manage
client requests. It enables clients to vote on enhancements
W dniu 2019-01-04 o 18:31, Phil Smith III pisze:
A colleague asked me, "WTF really *is* Zowe?" and the only answer I had was
that I thought it was like z/OSMF, only more so (and ISTR that it's even built on top of
z/OSMF), and open source.
[...]
That remains me my troubles when I teach
I have a question about setting up DFRMM on a new LPAR.
We currently have an LPAR called SYSA, running DFRMM on a z/OS R2.2 system.
We are in the process of building LPAR, SYSB, which will share everything with
SYSA, including the DFRMM control data sets. (The PDA data sets will be
independent).
Peter,
Me too, i have played with Postman generating HTTPS Get and retrieve JCL
info on jobs that were submitted it wasnt too bad.
My questions are on more complex work tasks, i.e. ; submit a RACF request
to do something like 'ADDUSER'..
Scott
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 3:55 PM Farley, Peter x23353
All done in a browser, or all done as an Eclipse-based interface that may have
a browser view? I thought it was going to be an open-source version of the
z/OS Explorer Eclipse setup (open source RDz?), but maybe I misunderstood too.
Also still learning.
Peter
-Original Message-
Seymour,
In many ways I preferred the SNA architecture over TCPIP. But i have a bias
since i did SNA work for many years and knew it very well.
Scott
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 1:05 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Well, at one time I expected
>
Tom, oh yeah. Isn't Zowe a CI/DEPLOY type product or aimed at CI/DEPLOY
needs ?
Scott
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 3:47 PM Tom Marchant <
000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 12:31:11 -0500, Phil Smith III wrote:
>
> >A colleague asked me, "WTF really *is*
On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 12:31:11 -0500, Phil Smith III wrote:
>A colleague asked me, "WTF really *is* Zowe?"
As a long-time fan of Frank Zappa, my first thought is "Wowie Zowie".
From the first album by The Mothers of Invention.
--
Tom Marchant
Toggling it on and off is fine, and I normally didn't use the crosshair cursor,
but it was a lifesaver when I needed it.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Roger Bolan
Sent:
Well, at some point peripheral vision becomes an issue; my guess is that 43"
would be okay but that 72" would be too big. I never saw the point of dual
monitors, except for cases where drivers weren't available for a single monitor
with the same real estate.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
I am still struggling with this question myself. The best I can tell; it is
intended to be a framework or set of standards to access existing z/OS APIs
(IBM z/OSMF) or create new APIs to access existing z/OS functionality, all done
in a web browser; perhaps extending existing z/OS functionally.
IMHO, if you don't have the source code then that in itself is a good reason to
get rid of the exit, carefully.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tom
Brennan
Sent: Friday,
On 1/4/2019 4:35 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
Whether or not your exit routine is doing anything useful can only be
determined by examining the routine and understanding the exit.
That means someone has to find the source code, make sure it's the
actual version running, and then be able to
Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>After all my years of using Vista exclusively, I've never used 'locate
>cursor'.
>I'm curious as to what otherwise un- or little-used key combo you assign to
>this function.
My reaction too! I tinkered, eventually figured out how to set it (some more
discussion
A colleague asked me, "WTF really *is* Zowe?" and the only answer I had was
that I thought it was like z/OSMF, only more so (and ISTR that it's even built
on top of z/OSMF), and open source.
I've seen https://www.rocketsoftware.com/zowe-open-source-mainframe
but it just says "Zowe good"
After all my years of using Vista exclusively, I've never used 'locate cursor'.
I'm curious as to what otherwise un- or little-used key combo you assign to
this function.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
Same here. I find it is great for lining up columns and such. I leave it on 99%
of the time.
Bill Hitefield
Dino-Software Corporation
800.480.DINO
423.878.5660
www.dino-software.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Don
Leahy
Sent: Saturday, December
Tony thanks as I said the basic design of my code is from section H in tcp/ip
for beginners “concurrent server” with the exception of the subtask having a
select or as I change it to selectx and multiple tasks
Thanks again
> On Jan 4, 2019, at 10:51 AM, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>
> This
This sounds like an ECB problem, not an EZASMI problem.
Double check your ECB list to make sure that you have the high bit set
in the last ECB pointer only. Make sure that any of your subtasks that
use the same ECB list is not setting the high-bit on the wrong ecb pointer.
Verify that you
On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 09:12:34 -0600, Dana Mitchell wrote:
>
>I like the Vista function 'locate cursor'.When you press the corresponding
>key(s), the cursor does your choice of blink or explode...
>
Isn't something like that endemic in Windows: dithering on CTRL makes
the cursor explode?
--
Rob
This is the way I have both it in the main and subtask. There is a way around
this problem by passing COMECBPT to the subtask. And posting the main task
To do a clean up
I am currently re-writing this code and if there is a real problem with the
main task getting control after the
What value do you have for APITYPE on your INITAPI call?
I believe you need APITYPE=3 for async processing.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Joseph Reichman
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 2:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: Concurrent
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 19:15:28 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>What do you do when you can't see where the cursor is in order to move it
>where want it?
I like the Vista function 'locate cursor'.When you press the corresponding
key(s), the cursor does your choice of blink or explode...
Dana
Just did didn't seem to help I'll post my code shortly but let me explain the
scenario.
As I stated in my earlier post I have two selects
* In the main acting as a listener
* In the subtask to do multiple I/Os different sockets
Initially before I do any reads or writes the 4
>From the LE team:
fetch() will indeed reject loading load module of another AMODE.
This is related to the fact that LE will not only load the module into
storage (with the LOAD macro) but will also manage some control blocks and
data for the module, such as the load list table, the WSA and
On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 10:20:50 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>39" 4K TVs are cheap as chips these days. The bigger the better. The
>days of dual monitors are over.
If your video card supports the 4K resolution, you can totally get rid of the
dual monitors. In fact, it can give the resolution of 4
Ok thanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rob
Scott
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 7:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: Concurrent Server Task Dispatch issue multitasking issue
I suggest replacing the EZASMI SELECTS with simple
The responses are all on target.
All of the exits are called when they are defined to be called. It is
likely not going to be overly helpful to count how many times.
Whether or not your exit routine is doing anything useful can only be
determined by examining the routine and understanding the
I suggest replacing the EZASMI SELECTS with simple STIMERM timers and see if
the problem still exists.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Joseph Reichman
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 12:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: Concurrent
Brian
I have that code the problem is after I attach my Subtasks my Main Task Hardly
gets control. I have 4 subtasks each with a EZASMI SELECT as each handles
multiple I/O’s I do a WTO after the TIMEOUT from the SELECT on both the main
task and subtask and it seems that the main task Hardly
I agree. I worked in an open plan office for years in the US, and it was a
regal pain trying to speak another language with a prospect while hearing other
people speaking English in the background. The worst offenders were the ones
who insisted on using speaker-phones! I resorted to starting
45 matches
Mail list logo
