Robert,
Yes it is.
However your remark lit a light in the back of my brain: if dss sets the
changebit on a newname, what would it do when I renamed the dataset to itself?
RENANMEU((dsname,dsname))
Yes, it restores the dataset to its original name, but it does set the
changebit.
A wonderful, I
Yes, you can use an MPF exit to catch the JCL error. The messages are merely
different messages, so you would have your MPF exit process whichever message
you want to use as your trigger.
Sorry for the marketing:
SyzMPF/z has a feature that will capture the condition codes (job failure or
Thank you so much :)
On Nov 4, 2019, at 12:02 AM, David Crayford wrote:
>
> LOL! Wrap them in a string!
>
> #pragma runopts("TEST(,,,TCPIP&192.168.1.164%8001:*)")
>
>> On 2019-11-04 12:37 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>> #pragma runopts(TEST(,,,TCPIP&192.168.1.164%8001:*))
>
>
LOL! Wrap them in a string!
#pragma runopts("TEST(,,,TCPIP&192.168.1.164%8001:*)")
On 2019-11-04 12:37 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
#pragma runopts(TEST(,,,TCPIP&192.168.1.164%8001:*))
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Hi
I am getting *=ERROR===> a - CCN3189 Floating-point constant when I
use the following pragma to specify remote debugging
#pragma runopts(TEST(,,,TCPIP&192.168.1.164%8001:*))
Would anyone know to specify remote debugging via a pragma
thanks
Not unless the job is submitted and executed under the control of a
'parent' job that does not itself end in JCL error. E.g. Control-M might
be able to handle this.
On 03/11/2019 08:41, Peter wrote:
> Is there a way to write WTO even if the previous step ends in JCL error ?
>
> On Sun, 3 Nov,
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>https://github.com/walmartlabs/zUID
>Courtesy of Walmart
Tony Harminc wrote:
>Wouldn't want to bump into that pending patent
>from Walmart...
Walmart licensed the code they're sharing under the Apache License 2.0:
https://github.com/walmartlabs/zUID/blob/master/LICENSE
On Sunday, November 3, 2019, 01:42:10 AM PDT, Peter
wrote:
> Is there a way to write WTO even if the previous step ends in JCL error ?
Sorry but I don't know of an easy method to capture JCL error, dataset not
found or ???. MPF exit for various messages will probably be the easiest.
On Sunday, November 3, 2019, 05:38:02 AM PST, Peter Relson
wrote:
> all other things being equal, ready tasks within in address space are >
> dispatched in a round-robin fashion. A time slice is a time slice.
Enclaves were supposed to be an exception to this rule. First, SRB's in an
Geeez I think I asked this before ..lol
On Tho, Oct 31, 2019 at 12:58 AM David Crayford wrote:
> On 2019-10-31 8:18 AM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
> > The documentation here is very vague So to my understanding If use I
> > CELQPIPI to with a INIT_SUB and GETSTOR,FREESTORE replacement and the
> >
The ADDSD is a profile if the dataset or HLQ isn’t found it will fail.
On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 2:25 AM Jon Perryman wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, October 30, 2019, 08:52:22 AM PDT, Sean Gleann <
> sean.gle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If I try to ADDSD 'ABC.DEF' UACC(NONE), I get "ICH09006I USER
It all depends; this is the logic for the 'V' record
which comes in two flavors, with value of bytes the
result of this code:
IF DCVCYLMG=' ' THEN DO; /* UNITS ARE KB*/
DCVALLOC=1024*DCVALLOC; /*CONVERT TO BYTES FOR MGBYTES FORMAT*/
DCVFRESP=1024*DCVFRESP;
The Initiator attaches the jobstep with a few privileged options on the ATTACH.
The new jobstep runs in the same address space but does not share job-related
control blocks with the Initiator. SVC 99 uses a privileged option of ENQ to
use the Initiators TCB for the queue head. The Initiator
Not if thre is a dd for it in the second step.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Saturday, November 2, 2019
"Large memory" is not the situation I am dealing with. It is a modern system
but it is at a service bureau and there is a substantial charge associated with
real memory. My management does not want to just throw money at the system; he
wants some way of seeing whether real memory constraint is
> If the two parties are running in different address spaces then a
> complaint could only be that the address space is consuming a lot of
CPU
> and that is exactly what WLM goals and priorities are for.
Only true if you ignore mixed workload address spaces
Perhaps you did not read that my
I'm not so sure that's practical and necessary for the large memory systems
that we have today.
Last time I looked across a number of customers it was fairly common for LPARs
with hundreds of GB of memory to have paging space < 1x memory. Sometimes much
less. Those with Storage Class Memory
Is there a way to write WTO even if the previous step ends in JCL error ?
On Sun, 3 Nov, 2019, 8:58 AM Jon Perryman, wrote:
> > Is there a WTO module which can write a message (highlight message) on a
>
> > console based on the JCL previous condition code?
>
>
> I believe you are asking about
On Wednesday, October 30, 2019, 08:52:22 AM PDT, Sean Gleann
wrote:
> If I try to ADDSD 'ABC.DEF' UACC(NONE), I get "ICH09006I USER OR GROUP
> ABC NOT DEFINED TO RACF"
I believe the error message is complaining about the OWNER which is defaulting
to ABC. Specify OWNER(xxx)
On Saturday, November 2, 2019, 07:35:08 PM PDT, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>> Sorry. I forgot to say EXEC PGM=AOPBATCH is safe.
> That might be true if AOPBATCH were installed with AC=0 in an authorized
> library.
AOPBATCH and COZBATCH must be linked AC=0 because the shell runs in problem
20 matches
Mail list logo
