On Sun, 24 May 2020 18:26:13 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>...
>+1 (What the H*** is gained by uppercasing a CART where the underlying
>service supports any 64-bit value? Don't over validate! This is the problem
>with various utilities that could handle UNIX files except that the utility
> +1 (What the H*** is gained by uppercasing a CART where the underlying
> service supports any 64-bit value?
Inertia? Blind adherence to poorly understood specifications. There are lots of
pathlogies in large organizations that could explain it. Report it, and if it
comes back BAD then submit
Right! Let the service fail and then report its error. Don't introduce some new
error to document and be learned.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 6:19 PM
To:
+1 (SUBMIT)
+1 (Doc)
+1 (What the H*** is gained by uppercasing a CART where the underlying
service supports any 64-bit value? Don't over validate! This is the problem
with various utilities that could handle UNIX files except that the utility
"validates" the filename and rejects slashes or
On Mon, 25 May 2020 00:53:04 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Never mind case; when will SUBMIT recognize that 80 is not the only integer?
>
>Also, when TSO (sub)commands upper case their input, the documentation should
>say so in an obvious location as part of the (sub)command description.
>
Never mind case; when will SUBMIT recognize that 80 is not the only integer?
Also, when TSO (sub)commands upper case their input, the documentation should
say so in an obvious location as part of the (sub)command description.
Finally, when a TSO (sub)command provides the facilities of a
On Sun, 24 May 2020 14:26:51 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>
>'MyCart01' (as written, in camel-case) was my intended CART and it is a valid
>CART: a CART may have any 64-bit value. The problem was that the CONSOLE
>command uppercased it to MYCART01. Yes, had I written my Rexx in such a way as
>to
No, the problem is you didn't adhere to the interface, possibly because the
relevant statement is not (RCF submitted*) in the obvious location. CONSOLE is
not the only case where you need to know the case behavior of the command. I
never said that you should uppercase everything, only that you
The problem was NOT that Rexx (or my coding style) failed to uppercase an
operand; the problem was that TSO did. Note my subject line: a rant about TSO.
'MyCart01' (as written, in camel-case) was my intended CART and it is a valid
CART: a CART may have any 64-bit value. The problem was that the
I run some IDCAMS processing under NetView for collecting certain data and have
never seen such a problem. The following are some old examples of the code and
this runs a LISTCAT and puts everything into a stem:
Do i = 1 To dsn.0
Until recently, we shared a catalog not only across sysplexes but between data
centers. All because of tape. We had STK virtual tape (in both data centers)
supported by MIA (Multi Image Allocation). These products require control data
sets shared among all exploiting systems. We could have
Thanks, but that doesn't work.
What did work was allocating the volcat on the volume I wanted to use. and then
using the intoempty paramters in the import.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joe
Monk
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 12:17 PM
To:
By using the VOLUMES keyword on the IMPORT, and specifying a NON-SMS
managed volume...
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/how-move-volcat-new-volume
Joe
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 2:30 AM Gadi Ben-Avi wrote:
> Hi,
> Our volcat (SYS1.VOLCAT.VGENERAL) was allocated on an SMS managed volume.
> We
Hi,
Our volcat (SYS1.VOLCAT.VGENERAL) was allocated on an SMS managed volume.
We would like to move it to a Non SMS managed volume.
The way I found was to export it and then import.
How do I tell IMPORT to allocate it on a non SMS managed volume, and not on the
storage class it was exported
> You seem stuck on this capitalization thing.
You seem to forget that this thread started on a capitalization issue. You also
seem to assume that my alleged fixation affects the way others code. You might
note that of the three error issues I listed, capitalization was last - why did
you
15 matches
Mail list logo
