Elaine, did you get the wait code during or after the IPL of the lpar. Unless
I'm looking at the wrong doc a wait code of 03C indicates you had an issue with
ASM. The other thing to consider depending on the size of your lpar in terms
of software stack 3 gig may not be enough. Depending on
Elaine,
I suspect what you are interested in seeing is found here: Single Object
Operations; select CPC; select Operational Customization; select Storage
Information.
"Storage Information
This window displays:
Information about storage installed and allocated for the base system.
Information
On 2020-07-29 19:15, Charles Mills wrote:
The error is from running the EXEC; it is not documentation of any UNIX error.
Correct. The exec is in SYS1.SBPXEXEC(BPXMTEXT).
--
Regards, Gord Tomlin
Action Software International
(a division of Mazda Computer Corporation)
Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax:
Found the BPXMTEXT problem. An EXEC library in the concatenation is VB. The
error is from running the EXEC; it is not documentation of any UNIX error.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Sent:
Take a look at your reset profile. Total storage on the z13 should show up
there.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, July 29,
Is there a way to see total central storage on a z13 HMC?
I can see it by selecting individual LPARs but am interested in an overall view.
I have 11 LPARs, 9 deactivated, I have activated and IPLd several of the 6GB
defined LPARs multiple times earlier this year.
All 9 deactivated again I'm
A program is in a WAIT ECBLIST on two ECB's.
The program's ESTAEX exit is driven by an operator CANCEL (ABEND S222).
Is it legal for the ESTAEX exit code to WAIT on one of those ECBs? If not,
what would be the symptoms? And if not, what would be necessary to "make it
legal"? Is it possible to
> There is a lot of this and that on the Web, but I would like to read the
> actual documentation for that reason code. Where do I find it? I look up
the
> message in LE M and find
Download the manual "z/OS UNIX System Services Messages and Codes" (3rd in
the list ) from here
Are you perhaps running some program via /bin/tso? That ends up calling
mvssigsetup. If
so, try changing to /bin/tsocmd. At least, that's the error we got and how we
got around
it, six years ago.
In article you wrote:
> Hi Charles,
> Not sure why, but the reason code looked very familiar
Thanks. That was part of the this and that which I found on the Web. No CICS
in my picture.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Mike Hochee
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 1:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Duh. I knew that. Thank you.
Interesting thing. It does not work for me. (IBM Dallas)
bpxmtext 0D070201
yields
IRX0435E An invalid record was found during exec load. This is an internal
error.
Which is totally irrelevant. There is no EXEC in this picture.
I will try to track down the signal
Hi Charles,
Not sure why, but the reason code looked very familiar to me. Googling returned
this link...
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/cee1000s-4093-90-cee5101c-bpx1mss-failed-when-using-posix
HTH,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Also, there are chapters titled something like Reason Code amd Return codes
These code are often actually two halfwords search the book for the lower half
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Gord Tomlin
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 1:47 PM
> To:
That's a USS reason code; you can find the meaning of it by issuing "tso
bpxmtext" followed by the reason code.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 4:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Trying to find
On 2020-07-29 16:35, Charles Mills wrote:
I am getting the following error when starting a UNIX program:
CEE5101C During initialization, the callable service BPX1MSS failed. The
system return code was 000156, the reason code was 0D070201 . The
application will be terminated.
There is a
I am getting the following error when starting a UNIX program:
CEE5101C During initialization, the callable service BPX1MSS failed. The
system return code was 000156, the reason code was 0D070201 . The
application will be terminated.
There is a lot of this and that on the Web, but I would
> Could you elaborate on why and when AVGRECLEN allocation is more
efficient?
Barry,
If AVGRLEN=n is not specified, DFSORT will use one-half of the maximum
record length as the average record length. To determine the input file
size for a sort application. DFSORT performs calculations based on
Could you elaborate on why and when AVGRECLEN allocation is more efficient?
Barry
Herbert W "Barry" Merrill, PHD
President-Programmer
Merrill Consultants
MXG Software
10717 Cromwell Drive
Dallas, TX 75229
www.mxg.com
214 351 1966
ad...@mxg.com for business questions
supp...@mxg.com for
Start over?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Dana Mitchell
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 1:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OSMF workflow step State unskip
I'm working my way through the z/OS 2.4
Dana,
You need to ensure you are the assignee and owner of the step.
Click on the skipped steps.
-> "Assignment and Ownership"
-> "Return"
Regards,
Ya-Fang
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Dana Mitchell
Sent:
On 7/29/2020 11:50 AM, Dana Mitchell wrote:
I'm working my way through the z/OS 2.4 migration workflow using z/OSMF, and i
clicked 'Skip' on a step by accident. Is there a way to un'Skip' a step? I
don't see any options available in the context menu for the step that might
unskip. I've
I'm working my way through the z/OS 2.4 migration workflow using z/OSMF, and i
clicked 'Skip' on a step by accident. Is there a way to un'Skip' a step? I
don't see any options available in the context menu for the step that might
unskip. I've also RTFKC and didn't find much help there
I've removed that email address from the list.
Darren
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Richards, Robert B. <01c91f408b9e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 7:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Response
> On 2020-07-29, at 10:00:53, Steve Smith wrote:
>
> There is a proper way to respond with "user not found", and that isn't it.
> asg.com should be blocked until they learn how to run a mail server.
>
> sas
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:55 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
>> Is there a way for
There is a proper way to respond with "user not found", and that isn't it.
asg.com should be blocked until they learn how to run a mail server.
sas
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:55 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Is there a way for the autoresponder to test the header for list fields?
> You might
Is there a way for the autoresponder to test the header for list fields? You
might suggest to him that autoresponding to list traffic is likely to cause ASG
delivery problems, especially if the mail software is doing it to high activity
lists.
If someone has stepped up to take Darren's place,
Is there anyway to get Steve Leverett unsubscribed from the mailing list
without Steve doing it himself? I chatted with Jeff Cherrington about turning
off the auto response, and he told me it needs to be left on for business
reasons.
Mark Jacobs ( An ASG employee )
Sent from ProtonMail,
steve.lever...@asg.com is no longer a valid e-mail address. Please contact
Jeff Cherrington at jeff.cherring...@asg.com with any questions, comments, or
concerns.
Diese steve.lever...@asg.com ist keine gultige Email-Adresse mehr. Bitte setzen
Sie sich mit Jeff Cherrington an folgende
> ICE752I 0 FSZ=100121518644 BC IGN=0 E AVG=16336 0 WSP=130040639 C
DYN=0 0
> ICE236I 0 OPTIONS:
DYNAPCT=10 ,MOWRK=Y,TUNE=STOR,EXPMAX=600,EXPOLD=200,EXPRES=100
Robert,
The file you are trying to sort is little over 100 Gigs, but your
installation option EXPMAX=600 MB which is only
steve.lever...@asg.com is no longer a valid e-mail address. Please contact
Jeff Cherrington at jeff.cherring...@asg.com with any questions, comments, or
concerns.
Diese steve.lever...@asg.com ist keine gultige Email-Adresse mehr. Bitte setzen
Sie sich mit Jeff Cherrington an folgende
Do not try to use the beautiful z/OS V2R4 enhancement OA54815: NEW FUNCTION -
SINGLE SYSTEM SCOPE COUPLE DATA SET, if you still run GDPS V4R1.
GDPS 4.1 does not know this type of Couple Datasets and takes 2 irritating
actions:
- Cancel IXGLOGR as soon as GPDS sees it
- GDPS
steve.lever...@asg.com is no longer a valid e-mail address. Please contact
Jeff Cherrington at jeff.cherring...@asg.com with any questions, comments, or
concerns.
Diese steve.lever...@asg.com ist keine gultige Email-Adresse mehr. Bitte setzen
Sie sich mit Jeff Cherrington an folgende
Thank you, Dave, Kees and Mike. It is all coming back to me now. I will
investigate our installation options
Bob
p.s. I sent a note to ASG asking them to kill that account causing the
additional emails.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
David
steve.lever...@asg.com is no longer a valid e-mail address. Please contact
Jeff Cherrington at jeff.cherring...@asg.com with any questions, comments, or
concerns.
Diese steve.lever...@asg.com ist keine gultige Email-Adresse mehr. Bitte setzen
Sie sich mit Jeff Cherrington an folgende
If you want to let DFSORT determine the amount of work space to allocate,
you need to remove the JCL SORTWORK DDs. Once DFSORT sees you've coded
your own SORTWORKs, it uses whatever space you've hard coded. I'd also add
OPTION DYNALLOC=(SYSDA,16) to your sort control statements. Instead of
General recommendation: in most situations DFSORT is well able to calculate its
SORTWK's.
Remove SORTWK's from JCL, update parms: remove DYNALLOC=N, check the DFSORT
defaults and use the where possible.
Kees
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
steve.lever...@asg.com is no longer a valid e-mail address. Please contact
Jeff Cherrington at jeff.cherring...@asg.com with any questions, comments, or
concerns.
Diese steve.lever...@asg.com ist keine gultige Email-Adresse mehr. Bitte setzen
Sie sich mit Jeff Cherrington an folgende
steve.lever...@asg.com is no longer a valid e-mail address. Please contact
Jeff Cherrington at jeff.cherring...@asg.com with any questions, comments, or
concerns.
Diese steve.lever...@asg.com ist keine gultige Email-Adresse mehr. Bitte setzen
Sie sich mit Jeff Cherrington an folgende
ICE046A 0 SORT CAPACITY EXCEEDED - RECORD COUNT 37505288
ICE253I 0 RECORDS SORTED - PROCESSED: 37505288, EXPECTED: 612
ICE098I 0 AVERAGE RECORD LENGTH - PROCESSED: 1486, EXPECTED: 16336
Dummy out or comment out the SORTWK DD statements. Then you get
dynamic allocation.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020
steve.lever...@asg.com is no longer a valid e-mail address. Please contact
Jeff Cherrington at jeff.cherring...@asg.com with any questions, comments, or
concerns.
Diese steve.lever...@asg.com ist keine gultige Email-Adresse mehr. Bitte setzen
Sie sich mit Jeff Cherrington an folgende
I am out of my element trying to figure out the following SORT issue. Job runs
normally when the number of SORTIN records is much less. JCL contains 16 SORTWK
datasets. If memory serves, isn't there a way to let SORT figure out how much
it needs?
ICE000I 1 - CONTROL STATEMENTS FOR 5650-ZOS,
41 matches
Mail list logo
