Re: JES2, meaning of parameter value codes

But what is the 'j' in 'jccc'? Why not just ''? From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Seymour J Metz Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 6:38 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: JES2, meaning of parameter value codes What is

Re: Solutions Not Problems - Dilbert Comic Strip on 2022-02-25 | Dilbert by Scott Adams

On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 15:25, Leonard D Woren wrote: > When a certain horrible 2-letter company acquired acf2, they did a > global change in the manuals from 'product' to 'solution'. > Occasionally made for some interesting sentences. > Solutionion? Tony H.

Re: Certificates ,extKeyUsage and Criticality flag

Okay. Well, good luck. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Michael Babcock Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 4:38 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Certificates ,extKeyUsage and Criticality flag CICS is

Re: JES2, meaning of parameter value codes

What is unclear? nn is any two digit number. jccc is any character string that is a valid ddname. PROCnn or Jccc names a concatenation that can be selected as the procedure library concatenation for a job, as specified by JOBCLASS(v), JOBCLASS(STC), JOBCLASS(TSU) or /*JOBPARM

Re: Certificates ,extKeyUsage and Criticality flag

CICS is the client, ZCEE is the server. I got a new CICS SITE certificate that includes clientAuth and serverAuth. I’ve gotten further but run into another issue. I’ve opened a case with IBM. Thanks for the assistance. On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 5:21 PM Charles Mills wrote: > Trying to follow

Re: JES2, meaning of parameter value codes

https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=class-parameter-description-jobclassclassstctsu PROCLIB=nn|j|00 Specifies the default 2-8 character procedure library name (jccc) or procedure library number (0-99) which is to be used for this job class. It allows you to specify procedure

Re: JES2, meaning of parameter value codes

Please post example and release level. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Frank Swarbrick [frank.swarbr...@outlook.com] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022

JES2, meaning of parameter value codes

I am looking at the JES2 Initialization and Tuning Reference. There are examples job parameters with codes such as "jxxx" and "jccc". I can't seem to find a table of their meanings. Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks, Frank

Re: Certificates ,extKeyUsage and Criticality flag

Trying to follow this. Who connects to who? (I'm not knowledgeable about ZCEE.) Is ZCEE the client (initiator of the connection) and CICS the server? If so, then CICS needs a *server* certificate and the lack of clientAuth is not the problem -- not with that certificate anyway. If CICS is

Re: Solutions Not Problems - Dilbert Comic Strip on 2022-02-25 | Dilbert by Scott Adams

When a certain horrible 2-letter company acquired acf2, they did a global change in the manuals from 'product' to 'solution'.  Occasionally made for some interesting sentences. /Leonard Art Gutowski wrote on 2/26/2022 8:04 PM: On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 16:19:21 -0500, Mark Regan wrote:

Re: Certificates ,extKeyUsage and Criticality flag

I know which cert has the problem.  It's the CICS SITE certificate which has serverAuth only in the extKeyUsage extension. What I'm trying to understand is IF the criticality flag is false AND the app recognizes the extension is it REQUIRED to honor the restrictions of said extension (if

Re: XEDIT assembler continuation lines

Maybe compatibility with EDIT. XEDIT came out with VM/SP R2, and by then 3270s were ubiquitous. Maybe an RFE is in order for a mode in which the TRUNC column applies to editing commands bu not to input from the keyboard. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

Re: XEDIT assembler continuation lines

FYI, Prior to converting from a System-3 to a 4331 running DOS/VS, IBM dropped a line-mode remote terminal into our shop. This would be about 1981. We edited programs and JCL using it for about 4 months before we finally got our 4331. Until this discussion, I had kinda forgotten this

Re: 2.5 Heads Up

On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 10:50, Ed Jaffe wrote: > On 2/28/2022 5:21 AM, Allan Staller wrote: > > > Peter, > > Can you post the trap? > > > https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=traps-slip-zero-address-detection-zad > "ZAD is not supported on z/OS under z/VM. ":-( Is there any SOD or

Re: AUXLIST (was XEDIT equivalent to ISPF C - OO/OO (copy overlay))

Shmuel wrote: >Your guess is worth what I paid for it. I started on the 3277 back when the competition was the 2260 and am at home with 3270 data streams. >What you wrote was "this will mean a new application *cannot* use existing hardware,", which isn't even close to saying that you need

Re: 2.5 Heads Up

Classification: Confidential Thanks Ed -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Jaffe Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 9:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: 2.5 Heads Up [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust

Re: Certificates ,extKeyUsage and Criticality flag

My reading of this is, the certificate sent *from the client *(not sent down from the server) does not have Client set in the EKU. I blogged on TLS, and said The Extended Key Usage

Re: 2.5 Heads Up

On 2/28/2022 5:21 AM, Allan Staller wrote: Classification: Confidential Peter, Can you post the trap? https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=traps-slip-zero-address-detection-zad -- Phoenix Software International Edward E. Jaffe 831 Parkview Drive North El Segundo, CA 90245

Re: XEDIT assembler continuation lines

On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 23:27:51 -0600, Alan Altmark wrote: >On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 17:47:31 +, Seymour J Metz wrote: >>Bummer. Maybe someone from IBM can shed light on the issue. > >I speculate that this was to prevent INSERT and CHANGE from overlaying column >72 by accident when editing in line

Re: Certificates ,extKeyUsage and Criticality flag

The criticality flag means "if you are too back-level to recognize this new extension then you must reject the certificate." A TLS implementation that recognizes the extension should always honor it. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Certificates ,extKeyUsage and Criticality flag

To all you certificate experts out there: We have z/OS Connect EE (ZCEE) installed and are running into an issue with our CICS SITE certificate.  We are getting the following during a handshake from CICS to ZCEE: "Extended key usage does not permit use for TLS client authentication" The

Re: 2.5 Heads Up

Classification: Confidential Peter, Can you post the trap? Thanks in advance, -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter Relson Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2022 7:28 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: 2.5 Heads Up [CAUTION: This Email is from