BLSR was initially developed by Washinton System Center as an assembler
language
sample program to go along with a book they were writing about using the
Subsystem Interface. At the time,
IBM was desperately looking for "ESA Exclusives" in order to sell 3090 machines
vs
the PCM
I understand, but in this case the z13s is a supported processor for z/OS 2.5,
but is almost completely incapable of running z/OSMF. It can run z/OSMF, but
the response time is unacceptable. We finally got IBM to compare z/OSMF on a
z13s without any zIIP and they came back to say that the one
IIRC, Batch LSR was developed at IBM by the BCP team; SMB was later developed
by the DFdfp team. SMB is not BLSR under-the-covers, but it offers the same
advantages.
SMB is the more modern solution. It has worked wonders at my shop. Just mind
your REGION size. If you haven't converted some
Purchase of an Intel XEON system to run a Linux system with zPDT could be used
purely to run Z/OSMF. Would that be good enough?
I think that might be cheaper than real Z upgrades, but I have not done any
arithmetic on software costs.
z/OS volume images could then be transferred using FTP when
Yes IBM allows for soft capping but that doesn't take care of the problem in 2
ways. First the soft cap only reduces a portion of the software license fees.
Second, you still have the larger hardware costs of buying the bigger machine
just to kneecap it.
Rex
-Original Message-
On 18/05/2022 3:53 pm, Timothy Sipples wrote:
So over roughly 25 years it’s been about 3.5 to 98 PCIs as the minimum
available CP configuration, or about a 28X increase.
I did say "a small" system in the 1990s, not the smallest available. But
your 28X illustrates the point. Over the same
Hello Mike,
Thank you for your comment.
But QUERY command doesn't support ODS parameter and HSENDCMD itself has
no option.
I have found the solution provided in HSM.SAMPLE.TOOL(QUERYSET) which
uses extended console support.
Best regards,
Nobuhiko Furuya(古谷信彦)
V-SOL Inc.
HSEND Q CDS ODS(my.output.file)
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 6:08 AM Nobuhiko Furuya wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Could you give me your advice ?
>
> We are converting CA-Disk to DFSMShsm.
> In this situation, we are to use HSENDCMD in TSO batch as follows.
>
> //STEP1EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
> //SYSPRINT
Doesn't IBM also allow software capping to a lower capacity than the
slowest uniprocessor through the operating system?
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 5:54 AM Timothy Sipples wrote:
>
> Andrew Rowley wrote:
> >It would benefit customers, software vendors and IBM if IBM could get
> >these small systems
Hello all,
Could you give me your advice ?
We are converting CA-Disk to DFSMShsm.
In this situation, we are to use HSENDCMD in TSO batch as follows.
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSIN DD *
HSENDCMD WAIT SETSYS SSMSTART(0005 0100)
HSENDCMD
10 matches
Mail list logo
