https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/10/google_cloud_paris_outage_persists/
--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Hello Tom
So the solarwind expects SNMPV2 ? Does SNMPV2 handle bulk request?
On Tue, May 9, 2023, 11:22 PM Tom Longfellow <
03e29b607131-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> My experiences with Solarwinds interacting with z/OS have not been
> pleasant.
>
> First discovered it as my
2.4.1 is more than a slight update, it’s a completely different front-end. To
make it more confusing there are three C/C++ compiler products on z/OS.
XL C/C++ is the legacy compiler which supports 31/64-bit and has CICS
translation built it. It can run as a batch program. IBM have made no
The point that I'm trying to make with IBM is why support a path option on the
SUBMITLIB parameter if it just doesn't work during JES2 initialization when the
system is IPLed? The design is broken.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
On Tue, 9 May 2023 19:58:11 +, Mark Jacobs wrote:
>I opened a ticket with IBM on this. Should be interesting to hear what they
>say.
>
Keep the list posted. I'm taking short odds on WAD in view of Rex's concerns.
OMVS remains a second-class citizen; considered expendable. You might be
This would be a one-time call to retrieve the WTO output, not a repeating
event, but thanks for the suggestion.
Instead I'm coding a test version of the in-house utility to make the data
easier to get (PUTLINE instead of WTO) for my one-time use.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Yes, I guess that would be the only real way to accomplish this. I could use
the SDSF Rexx API, but it may be more trouble that it is worth to me for this
one-time use.
Thanks for the suggestion though.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
I opened a ticket with IBM on this. Should be interesting to hear what they say.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, May 9th, 2023
My experiences with Solarwinds interacting with z/OS have not been pleasant.
First discovered it as my major source of Scanning ports of my system for
vulnerabilities.Until I purposely put in Defensive Management Demon
filters, they were my ONLY source of that kind of hacking attempts.
Hi Peter,
Assuming you have SDSF, have you considered using its one of its APIs
to scan the SYSLOG every n minutes?
Regards,
David
On 2023-05-09 13:55, Farley, Peter wrote:
I believe that the CONSOLE facility is authorized and I have no authorization.
I have no access to either System
Gil,
They do at least provide the URL, I left it off for brevity. No word as to
whether they'll send any kind of correspondence in the future or just expect
folks to bookmark the URL and then remember to go look on a weekly (or other
regularly scheduled time) basis.
Rex
-Original
If this process run as a batch job, the wto will be written to jesmsglg.
You may call sdsf to read your own job log...
בתאריך יום ג׳, 9 במאי 2023 ב-20:56 מאת Farley, Peter <
031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>:
> I believe that the CONSOLE facility is authorized and I have no
>
John,
The announcement letter email wasn't just z-series. I used to support p-series
hardware and AIX as well, and idle curiosity has kept me getting those
announcements as well. They were all included in the e-mail, based on your
preferences.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM
I believe that the CONSOLE facility is authorized and I have no authorization.
I have no access to either System Rexx or Netview Rexx.
Any other ideas? The business need is not sufficient to request
authorizations, this is just a script to set up some test data that would
really be helped by
The macro used is a simple assembler WTO macro with text, nothing fancy. It is
unfortunately not feasible to permanently change to a PUTLINE since the primary
usage of the WTO output is in existing production batch processes, not TSO or
Rexx usage.
I guess I could cobble up a temporary
I realized a couple of years ago that I'd stopped even reading the
announcements, because there was so little in there. Which is itself
symptomatic of a problem, not a rebuttal to Rex's point!
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 1:26 PM Paul Gilmartin <
042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
It depends on the macro used to create the message. See below snippet from
the manual:
However, OUTTRAP does trap output from the PUTLINE macro with DATA or INFOR
keywords. Therefore, if you write any command processors, you may want to
use the PUTLINE macro rather than the TPUT or WTO macros.
See the CONSOLE facility in TSO. I don't know whether it is available in System
Rexx.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Farley, Peter <031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2023 1:30 PM
To:
Cross-posted to IBM-MAIN and TSO-REXX lists.
Is there any way for Rexx script to capture WTO output? This is a simple
case, a one-line WTO, no multiline possible.
I only recently found a need to do this, and my tests so far say "no it can't".
/* Rexx */
/* Capture WTO from BATCHPGM */
xtrp =
On Tue, 9 May 2023 16:56:56 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>...
>
>This weekly e-mail communication is now sunset. You can find the weekly IBM
>product announcements on the IBM Documentation Announcements page.
>
>
Did they not supply a URL? Shame!
>Now, instead of a short summary delivered to
WAG - they want to sunset the equipment that runs the functions and the
z/OS customers are not important enough to port the process elsewhere. Or
maybe they "released" everyone who knew anything about it.
IMO, IBM doesn't really care about that much about z anymore.
Neither do I. I'll be playing
If anybody with a strong z/OS HLASM background is looking for a remote
programming position, please contact me offline. Must be able to obtain a
public trust clearance.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
+1
Lionel B. Dyck <><
Website: https://www.lbdsoftware.com
Github: https://github.com/lbdyck
Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what you
are, reputation merely what others think you are. - - - John Wooden
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Why, IBM? Was sending out an announcement letter summary that taxing on your
limited resources that you had to eliminate this convenience for your customers?
Instead of the normal Tuesday announcement letter summary I got this:
This weekly e-mail communication is now sunset. You can find the
I see a problem with this scenario. It appears to me that there is a call (not
necessarily by Shmuel) to potentially have JES2 wait for OMVS to be up before
it does its startup (or at least completes the startup). Due to a
self-inflicted screw-up on one of our LPARs, OMVS decided it had to do
So the
> On May 9, 2023, at 11:14 AM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>
> I could do the same with the sub command exit
>
>>> On May 9, 2023, at 11:10 AM, Michael Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 07:37:27AM -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>>> I am just wondering when using IKJOPER
I could do the same with the sub command exit
> On May 9, 2023, at 11:10 AM, Michael Stein wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 07:37:27AM -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>> I am just wondering when using IKJOPER (operand) and for clarity's sake I
>> would like to use an example from TSO TEST so
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 07:37:27AM -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote:
> I am just wondering when using IKJOPER (operand) and for clarity's sake I
> would like to use an example from TSO TEST so I would imagine the '=' of TSO
> TEST is an IKJOPER
Well, it doesn't work like that... Test prescans the
Yes, IBM absolutely should take startup sequence into account and should
provide mechanisms to ensure that things occur in the proper order. This goes
beyond OMVS.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
Thank you
> On May 9, 2023, at 11:02 AM, Tony Harminc wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 May 2023 at 15:12, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
>> I believe that the optional source tapes for OS/360 and OS/VS2 3.8 are
>> archived (CBTTAPE?), so it should be possible to examine the source code
>> for TEST.
>
>
> MVS
On Tue, 9 May 2023 12:18:11 +, Mark Jacobs wrote:
>I defined several submitlibs in my JES2PARM to use directories in a ZFS
>filesystem. When I hotstart JES2, JES2 can find everything and is happy.
>During IPL/JES2 startup it's not. It doesn't seem like OMVS is initialized yet
>and so the
On Tue, 9 May 2023 at 15:12, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> I believe that the optional source tapes for OS/360 and OS/VS2 3.8 are
> archived (CBTTAPE?), so it should be possible to examine the source code
> for TEST.
MVS 3.8 TSO modules can also conveniently be browsed at
It is not possible to use the TEST statement of IKJTSOxx to cause TEST to treat
assignment statements as user subcommands. Furthrt, we it possible you'd need
to duplicate the functionality of the existing assignment statement and
distinguish a normal assignment from your version.
It is
MVS 380 examined the source code included in the MVS 3.8 tapes that
various Hercules developers ordered from IBM. For the most part, it
was at MVS 3.7 base level with many 3.7 PTFs, 3.8 base and PTFs not
included. For a few products, the they attempted to update the source
code for the final MVS
Seymour
I can only say you are amazing
It seems it is not possible
To customize an operator like ‘=‘
As the subcommand
Must appear the first entered text
Talking in IKJTSOxx
subcmd(scmd,LOAD1)
Thank you
> On May 9, 2023, at 9:12 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> I believe that the
I believe that the optional source tapes for OS/360 and OS/VS2 3.8 are archived
(CBTTAPE?), so it should be possible to examine the source code for TEST. I
would expect it to be something like
IKJOPER 'Err label',OPERND1=OP1,RSVWD=OPLIST,OPERND2=OP2
OP1 IKJTERM 'Err label', ...
OPLIST
Yeah, I've been just as confused as anyone. It doesn't make much sense to
have an entirely new compiler ("Open XL C/C++") with a name so subtly
different from the old one ("XL C/C++"). It's typical of IBM to add &
remove fashionable buzzwords to/from product names with no significance.
So this
Hi Phil,
Tsuris?! ... Maybe farklempt is more apt?
(For people of Yeshivish background (like me) Ogmas Nefesh is even closer.)
Regards,
David
On 2023-05-09 00:26, Phil Smith III wrote:
Seymour,
Since you seem to be getting upset about this academic discussion, I will bow
out. No need
No, I'm getting upset about trying to put words in my mouth; that's not
something that is acceptable in Academia.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Phil
I defined several submitlibs in my JES2PARM to use directories in a ZFS
filesystem. When I hotstart JES2, JES2 can find everything and is happy. During
IPL/JES2 startup it's not. It doesn't seem like OMVS is initialized yet and so
the file systems aren't accessible for JES2 to resolve. I
Hi
I am just wondering when using IKJOPER (operand) and for clarity's sake I
would like to use an example from TSO TEST so I would imagine the '=' of TSO
TEST is an IKJOPER
Used to modify storage.
The subcommand is '='
Does the subcommand have to be the first operand I mean clearly
41 matches
Mail list logo
