We're using ISKLM on a pair of Windows servers for both disk and tape.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed
Jaffe
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] SKLM Servers
Curious what folks are doing to
t; To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date: Tuesday, 16 March 2021 12:51 PM CDT
> Subject: Re: z14 HMC log information
>
> I found the log - nothing in it. Heading off to IBM.
>
> Rex
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.E
(looking for new job)
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 22.03.2021 o 23:18, Pommier, Rex pisze:
> OK, this is embarrassing. We found the problem - but don't know the culprit.
> We discovered the quiesce command wasn't locked down and somebody somewhere
> keyed it in. The reason we don't know
> From: Rex rpomm...@sfgmembers.com
> To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date: Tuesday, 16 March 2021 12:51 PM CDT
> Subject: Re: z14 HMC log information
>
> I found the log - nothing in it. Heading off to IBM.
>
> Rex
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM M
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 12:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] z14 HMC log information
Hi all,
Probably a simple question but I'm not having any luck looking for it so I'm
asking
Gil,
I can't speak to javascript or Ruby but I believe Python is available. I
haven't looked into it but a notification came across IBM-Main recently
announcing a Python SDK. Here's the text of the message:
IBM Open Enterprise SDK for Python 3.9 was generally available on Jan 15th,
2020.
information
I found the log - nothing in it. Heading off to IBM.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 12:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] z14 HMC log information
Hi all,
Probably a simple
: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 1:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z14 HMC log information
Any chance that the system abended?
Seems worth looking into your operator logs.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 1:51 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> I found the log - nothing in it. Heading off to
I found the log - nothing in it. Heading off to IBM.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 12:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] z14 HMC log information
Hi all,
Probably a simple
Hi all,
Probably a simple question but I'm not having any luck looking for it so I'm
asking here.
Is there a centralized place on a z14 HMC to show activity occurring, LPAR
activation/deactivation, pretty much anything that happens on an HMC or on a z.
We just took a hit where one of our
When I installed 2.4 late last year I ended up with a 2-mod27 zFS for the
SMPNTS and a 2-mod27 zFS for the smpwork filesystem. Once I gave it plenty of
space the install sailed smoothly. I've always gotten my serverpac across the
internet so have no experience with DVD images. IDK if the DVD
for execution and find out that
the job before it deleted an input dataset, or that the JCL called a control
card member that was empty, or that the program to be executed in step 3 wasn't
compiled properly so the job abends.
Mitch
-Original Message-
From: Pommier, Rex
To: IBM-MAIN
On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 10:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: JCL checkers?
CAUTION: This email is from an external address. Please be careful of links and
attachments.
Has anybody heard whether Broadcom will be raising the price of JCLCheck? I
used
Chris,
It must have just been put into place. Back in the late 80s, early 90s when I
installed JCLCheck I activated that function. In ISPF edit hit a PFKey and it
ran the check, popping JCL errors etc. right in the edit session. I agree,
very slick.
Rex
-Original Message-
From:
Has anybody heard whether Broadcom will be raising the price of JCLCheck? I
used it many years ago and liked it but haven't had access to a commercial JCL
checker in well over 20 years.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
McCabe, Ron
Sent:
I haven't used any of these except the CA one over 20 years ago... In no
particular order.
ISC Software JCL checker
CA-JCLCheck
SEA JCLPlus
JCLPrep (IDK who markets this one)
Used to be something called smartJCL
Used to be something called Jscan
PRO/JCL
Just to name a few.
Rex
SDSF to get it to a flat file then IND$FILE to transfer it? AFAIK, IND$FILE
can't handle spool data directly.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Tony Thigpen
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 3:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] getting
Call me snarky then, because I purposely left the multiple iterations of the
instructions when I responded.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 8:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External]
Steve,
Look at the bottom of this e-mail and you will see the instructions on how to
get the instructions you're looking for.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
seungcheol lee
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 3:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
So how about this: Run the ISRDDN to your screen, grab your trusty smart phone
and take a picture of the first page of it, PF8 take another picture until
done, then e-mail them the pictures and tell them that until they provide you a
better tool that "can't be compromised" this is what they're
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 4:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: question on enqueues
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 22:19:56 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>Thanks, Dave, you poin
.
==
[Default] On 15 Feb 2021 15:37:38 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
rpomm...@sfgmembers.com (Pommier, Rex) wrote:
>I have one that's puzzling me and I'm sure there's a simple solution/answer.
>I'm seeing 2 jobs r
I have one that's puzzling me and I'm sure there's a simple solution/answer.
I'm seeing 2 jobs running on a single system that are hitting an enqueue
problem on a parmlib. The JCL in both jobs has DISP=SHR, yet one of the jobs
has an exclusive ENQ on the library. Here's the scenario:
Job A
No, it is not required. I upgraded from 2.2 to 2.4 6 months ago using a
serverpack.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bruce Lightsey
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 9:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] clarification please - is
tly what I was going to say.
>
>On 12/23/2020 7:40 AM, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>>
>> Yeah there's a problem with it - a human problem. It's easy when in a hurry
>> to miss the fact they're reversed ...
>>
"reversed"? Is there a canonical order for DD statemen
We jumped from 2.2 to 2.4 and didn't have to do anything with our SMS CDS
definitions. I don't think you need to do anything to them.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
TSDunlap
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 10:28 AM
To:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 8:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: Build and submit proc
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 19:51:50 -0800, Tom Brennan wrote:
>
>... look out if
is.’
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: 09 December 2020 18:19
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: does anyone recall any details about MVS/XA?
Somewhere in the past, there was an article printed where somebody was gazing
into a crystal ball
, but it has saved me on countless
occasions. That's assuming you're trying to get back to TSO of course.
Andy Styles
z/Series System Programmer
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: 09 December 2020 19:18
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
I'm going to *slightly* disagree with the multi windows instead of a session
manager. Session manager gets closer to a single signon because it can mask
signing on to everything. It also typically has a longer timeout and can
seemingly withstand a network drop. I'm currently experiencing
Somewhere in the past, there was an article printed where somebody was gazing
into a crystal ball. I have (maybe had) it on paper but can't find it right
now. They were conjecturing on IBM's next OS and they called it MVS/ESB. They
were pretty convinced that IBM's next move from 31 bit was
Paul,
Thank you for that memory jog. Yep, it was MVS/Express. It was a stand-alone
restore tape of MVS/XA (ours was 2.1.7) that once restored was an IPLable XA
system - and reasonably current on maintenance.
Fun time was going to a class for MVS newbies and using the MVS/express tape.
8
Looking at this a bit further, getting this PTF installed requires the PTFs to
install the PTFs for encrypting the spool file. And it requires an IPL to pick
up the changes.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, October
In regards to TYPRUN=COPY not working.
In case anybody is interested in this, I received notice yesterday that PTF
UJ04073 is now available for this APAR. I haven't installed it yet but it's
there.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
2 line CLIST in my ISPF CMDPROC concatenation named "W":
PROC 1 DSN
ISRDDN E
ISPF 3.4, just enter W as a line command. Definitely a time saver. :-)
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Graham Harris
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 6:54 PM
That's not what is happening. A different poster nailed it earlier. If the
"Display Total Tracks" is selected on the dataset list utility screen, the
first time you hit PF10/11 to go right or left, ISPF needs to read the entire
list in order to populate the "total tracks" line. Thus you get
Hi Salva,
Thank you. I saw the second job spawn off as FTPD4 but had completely
forgotten the address space rename. Thanks again for jogging my aging memory.
:-)
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Salva Carrasco
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020
Hello list,
I'm working on doing some configuration of syslogd, namely trying to split out
FTP data into a separate log file from the rest of the daemon records getting
logged.
Here's the relevant portion of the syslogd configuration:
*.ftp*.*.* /var/logs/ftpd.log
*.*
z/OS 2.4, it does not remember shutting those options off. I'm OK with the
behavior and could take it either way but I know I'd be recovering user
datasets much more often if the "are you sure" wasn't there.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
handle concatenation with more than 16 data sets?
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 21:28:26 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>
>Serious question - what would be the purpose for doing this? I know you can,
>I'm just trying to grasp a good reason for doing so. Security by obscurity
>(not valid in my mind)?
&g
Gil,
Serious question - what would be the purpose for doing this? I know you can,
I'm just trying to grasp a good reason for doing so. Security by obscurity
(not valid in my mind)?
Thanks,
Rex
Alas, the padding and stripping mean that 'WOMBAT', 'WOMBAT ', and 'WOMBAT
',
distinct UNIX
Robert,
IDK if this specifically LMMINIT, but when I enter ISRDDN and try to browse a
library concatenation with greater than 16 libraries in it, I get this:
Only the first sixteen data sets are shown in this list. ISRDDN uses ISPF
services to process DD names and these services are limited
Sorry, list, that wasn't supposed to go here.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 4:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] BOF on COBOL and the systems programmer at SHARE
Argggh, I
al Message-
From: Clark Morris
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 4:44 PM
To: Pommier, Rex
Subject: Re: [External] BOF on COBOL and the systems programmer at SHARE
[Default] On 22 Sep 2020 10:22:36 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
rpomm...@sfgmembers.com (Pommier, Rex) wrote:
>Thanks, Clark,
>
Are they recording BOFs or just regularly scheduled sessions?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 1:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: BOF on COBOL and the systems programmer at
Thanks, Clark,
Hoping to see you at 15:15 Central time on Thursday. :-)
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Clark Morris
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 10:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] BOF on COBOL and the systems
aging rate compared with modules in other
libraries."
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ieae100/plpae.htm
Joe
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 7:57 AM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
>Unlike PLPA, it is subject to page out.
>
> Are you saying that P
Unlike PLPA, it is subject to page out.
Are you saying that PLPA pages are fixed and can't be paged out? Isn't that
what the first P in PLPA means - pageable? The FLPA modules are page fixed and
not subject to page-outs.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
Bill,
If UI70029 supercedes UI69028, then yes, the code correction in UI69028 is
included.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 9:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] MEPL showing
detail.
--Roger
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 11:25 AM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I have a question that has puzzled me on and off for years regarding
> the work selection criteria for the JES2 spool offload facility. That
> is the use of the slash. I get the part about criteria
Hi List,
I have a question that has puzzled me on and off for years regarding the work
selection criteria for the JES2 spool offload facility. That is the use of the
slash. I get the part about criteria left of the slash being required, i.e. if
you have JOBNAME=ABCDE and WS=(JOB/) only
50% OF LOCAL PAGE DATA SET SPACE IS ALLOCATED
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, September 4, 2020 8:54 AM, Pommier, Rex
wrote:
>
I know this is a long shot but did you check your storage array to make sure
there wasn't a hiccup in it that momentarily disabled the SCM?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mark Jacobs
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 7:00 AM
To:
.
_
Dave Jousma
AVP | Director, Technology Engineering
Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids, MI
49546
616.653.8429 | fax: 616.653.2717
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday
And I placed and received one earlier today as well. Downloaded it and
realized I had the wrong PTF so went back to ShopZ to order the right one, and
got (and still get) blank screen. Tried new browser instance, next step -
reboot. :-(
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Hi all,
Can anybody get into ShopZ? I was there a half hour ago now I just get a blank
screen. Literally - a white blank page.
Thanks,
Rex
The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from
disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is
Hmm, guess I don't exist. LOL Never had a twitter account and don't want one.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 4:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: Dovetail/Kirk Wolf?
If
s.
5. Most document in huge library are not needed for years, but you never know
when something is needed...
6. I like this book and I browse/read it. You may call it deviation, but this
is part of education about the machines. ;-)
Regards
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 06.
Radoslaw,
The announcement letter says the planned availability date for the enhancements
is September 15. I believe the documentation will be available on that date as
well. In your note below, you quoted them " and will be available at planned
availability in the "Library" section of
Radoslaw,
Speed limits are different in the States based on which state you're in. Each
state can set its own speed limit. I am in South Dakota, and most smaller 2
lane roads are 55 MPH. Many of the state 2 lane roads are 65, and the
interstates have an 80 MPH speed limit, the equivalent of
Nice catch, Joe.
Charles,
I would agree about a customer-facing process not generating messages upon
termination. However, the FTP daemon isn't "quite" that bad. Just for
curiosity, I tried to start a second FTPD on my sandbox. It did what it was
supposed to do, started the FTPD1 daemon
A kilogram may not technically be a weight, but if not the whole world, at
least a large percentage of the world uses it as such. Looking at a package of
dried fruit in front of me and it says net weight 340 grams which I believe
translates to .34 kilograms.
Rex
-Original Message-
Ron,
Let me rephrase that for you. So many words, so much... Blowing Snow.
I like the first line of the last paragraph, which is a Gartner quote from last
year:
"The value gained by moving applications from the traditional enterprise
platform onto the next 'bright, shiny thing' rarely
Or, if not, I would hope the OP would be getting a zillion "unauthorized"
messages from people trying to update the master catalog.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bruce Lightsey
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 11:15 AM
To:
Thanks, Tom!
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom
Ross
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] COBOL 6.3 compiler options question
>Can somebody give me a definitive definition of the NOJTC and JTC
CTIVE'
(fully specified or 'Active') Use ENTER to Perform Selection; Use DOWN
Command to View next Selection Panel;
Use HELP Command for Help; Use END Command to Exit.
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 20:03:33 + "Pommier, Rex"
wrote:
:>Obvious questions would be
:>
:>1) do you
Obvious questions would be
1) do you have some kind of filter on screens 2 or 3 of the selection criteria?
2) old CDS name?
3) using a saved list instead of generating a new one for the source?
If none of these things are it, may I suggest showing us your volume selection
entry panel?
Rex
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 3:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: COBOL 6.3 compiler options question
I'm kind of hoping Captain COBOL will see my request and respond.
Not I.
There is a May, 2020 update to the P/G and it's not in there.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 2:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: COBOL 6.3 compiler
Hi,
Can somebody give me a definitive definition of the NOJTC and JTC compiler
options in 6.3? I'm not seeing it in the COBOL reference or any COBOL manual
for that matter, yet it shows up on the option list when we compile a program:
NOFLAGSTD
HGPR(PRESERVE)
NOINITCHECK
Regarding the second disk failing while the first was rebuilding, I've heard
more than once that a second failure in a RAID array shortly after the first,
while the rebuild is happening is not that uncommon. Something about the
sudden extra stress on the rest of the drives in the RAID set due
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
John McKown
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 8:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: Storage & tape question
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:19 AM Jackson, Rob
wrote:
> Fun little note on RAID: it is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 5:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: Using SSH and SFTP from Windows to z/OS using
authorized_keys ???
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:12:59 -0600, Grant Taylor
Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 4:08:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: trying to find IBM problem determination tools studio for downloading
**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**
**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders
Hi List,
As the subject says, I'm looking for a current URL where I can find the latest
version (whatever version that is) of the PD Tools Studio software. Supposedly
this software is a free download for anybody who has IBM debug tool or
FileManager. We have FileManager and I have developers
Hi Allan,
Nope, he meant MB. The number Rob is talking about it thruput. You pay for
the capacity of the pipeline for ingesting data into the VTS in 100 MB/second
increments.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Monday, July
Hi Peter,
I don't think anybody answered this question. With modern (read: emulated)
boxes I've been told the location of the VTOC/VTOCIX/VVDS don't matter anymore.
Back in the SLED days I was a stickler for placing the VTOC & IX 1/3 of the
way into the volume, right next to each other to
e...too me it is a BREECH of security
Want to stay off list.. my email is ron.we...@omf.com
They only mentioned a exit/api needs to be installed >> bother me ... trying to
get pros/cons and what others have experienced..
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
P
Unfortunately, yes, a bit. I only have to deal with the mainframe connector
and at this point it's only used for reporting but they're looking at making it
do a bunch more.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ron
Wells
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 7:29
Who's maintaining your z9? Is that still supported by IBM?
I know that years ago at a prior site, we had a couple HP-branded Hitachi boxes
that we were migrating off, and we went to a third party service contract for
the HP disk. When an HDA failed, I actually swapped it out and sent it to
Yup, that's what it means. systeM.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 12:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: How display amount of real storage?
Playing around, I see that /D M with no
Hi group,
I have a light - probably trivia by now - question for those of you who have
been around a while. My earliest experience with IBM disk was 3380s. They ran
3 phase power, and if the phases weren't cabled correctly, the machine wouldn't
power up. I seem to recall hearing stories of
IBM assigned an APAR number on Friday to this. It is APAR OA59800.
Thanks,
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
Yes, because z/OS (well, the allocation routines anyway) knows nothing of the
back-end storage. As far as z/OS is concerned its data is still sitting on
SLED 3390 volumes so things like free extent sizes and so on still matter.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
I agree with Dave completely. I do similar - on both APPLY CHECK and APPLY.
Why spend an inordinate amount of time telling SMP/E manually to do what SMP/E
is designed to do automatically. Let it skip the open APARs and other things
that will cause a "bad" return code. Like Dave said, just
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments
Update on this. I opened a PMR on it and got a reply back from IBM that they
are opening an APAR on this.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 1:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] z/OS
DITTO or FileManager will produce such a disk volume map.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 8:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: dfdss equivalent to fdr map
FDR
In John's defense, when I saw "volume map" and "dfdss" in the same sentence, I
thought like John did, that you wanted a tape volume map. That's what I get
for thinking this early in the morning. :-)
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
David
Hi Steve,
As the OP, I agree that this doesn't appear to be an SDSF issue. I was trying
to make sure it wasn't a display issue with my third party software, and
knowing that others who are running SDSF are having the same issue gives me
confidence that it is a problem in (most likely) JES2.
WEDNESDAY, 17 JUN 2020
11.24.16 J0056548 IRR010I USERID ALOEFIS ASSIGNED TO THIS JOB.
Regards,
Al Loeffler
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday
: CA-ACCUCHEK
CA-ACCUCHEK was a file comparison utility similar to comparex.
Joe
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 2:06 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Based on the subject line of my post, does anybody know anything about
> something called CA-ACCUCHEK? I have a developer
Hello list,
Based on the subject line of my post, does anybody know anything about
something called CA-ACCUCHEK? I have a developer asking about it and I know
nothing about it. I checked CA's (OK, Broadcom's) web site and got no hits.
Duck Duck Go wasn't any help either, pointing me to some
Of
Michael Babcock
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 3:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
The default MSGLEVEL was 1,1 and that’s what was coded on the jobcard.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:47 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hi Michael and Allan,
>
: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
I get the same thing you do under z/OS 2.4. About 12 lines of output. I
have SDSF.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a
, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a
> competing product. As part of our testing of 2.4, one of my coworkers
> submitted a job with TYPRUN=COPY on the job card and found it doesn'
Hello list,
I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a competing
product. As part of our testing of 2.4, one of my coworkers submitted a job
with TYPRUN=COPY on the job card and found it doesn't work. Under 2.2, we get
the entire input stream before the JES2 job
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 3:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: CBTTAPE
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 19:04:24 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>But what of those of us who don't have S
I remember that as well. They would display about 3-4 pages of the manual and
have the rest grayed out with the "pay to unlock and read".
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom
Brennan
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 2:03 PM
To:
But what of those of us who don't have SDSF? Yes, we exist. :-)
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jousma, David
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 1:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: CBTTAPE
I keep saying thisuse the
401 - 500 of 1047 matches
Mail list logo
