allow customers to interact with zOS and/or CICS
apps and data sources.
Russ Teubner
HostBridge Technology
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message
of the System z hardware makes a
big difference. If the GPs are knee-capped relative to the zIIPs, the GP
savings and potential improvement in throughput are staggering in some cases.
Russ Teubner
HostBridge Technology
--
For IBM
and COBOL to work in this environment are a WHOLE different matter.
It's certainly not impossible, but it should be approached with great care.
Russ Teubner
HostBridge Technology
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
zAAP's are indeed used by Java code running on a TCB. However, to my
knowledge, it does not follow that: With zAAP on zIIP, they must be using
SRB's. IBM determines the rules in this regard.
To me (as both an ISV and System z developer), IBM allowing more code to run on
specialty engines is
. If fact, there's an
option to not even run it under an Enclave SRB. This approach holds true for
the following products: HB Base, HB JavaScript Engine, HB Socket Support. HB
BPIC (Batch Programs Inside CICS) doesn't exploit zIIP.
Russ Teubner
HostBridge Technology
www.hostbridge.com
of our zIIP-enablement RD
we compared the cost of: (a) frequently starting Enclave SRBs, and (b)
using a persistent Enclave SRB in conjunction with MVS Suspend/Resume
services. We actually ended up using both techniques in our product
(although in different situations).
Russ Teubner
HostBridge
