On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 10:22:34 -0500, Doug Henry doug_he...@usbank.com wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 09:29:57 -0500, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am not very knowledgeable on this sort of thing. Is AT-TLS something
different from SSL? I don't really know. In the z/OS 1.12 Comm
On Thu, 30 May 2013 15:56:39 -0400, Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net
wrote:
For reason code 4 the explanation says
A program issued a SVC 114 the EXCPVR macro
That may be a possible clue to your problem. It says you're using EXCPVR, and
from z/OS V1R13.0 DFSMSdfp Advanced Services we can
On Thu, 30 May 2013 16:15:42 -0500, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Thu, 30 May 2013 11:44:32 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
So do I have overkill? .
Software disasters can be the hardest ones to plan for. What do
you do if one of your critical applications has a program
On Wed, 29 May 2013 16:54:49 -0500, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
Is there an easy way for a program to get the DISP (NEW/MOD/SHR/OLD) of a
DD from the TIOT, or do you have to do a RDJFCB?
I'm somewhat curious why you'd want to know, from a program, Kirk.
But however you get it, I'll
On Sat, 18 May 2013 15:17:22 -0500, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://mainframed767.tumblr.com/post/50574743147/big-iron-back-door-maintp-part-two
basically the person must be able to ftp into a UNIX subdirectory and
to submit a job. They upload a program called netcat into
On Tue, 7 May 2013 12:49:32 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Tue, 7 May 2013 13:34:07 -0400, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
On 5/7/2013 5:02 AM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
The only way I can think of restricting is an exit in JES2. Or if this is a
TSO User you may wish to look at
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:54:12 -0400, Biller, Charles A (CHUCK)
chuck.bil...@verizon.com wrote:
Release 5. User reports he's not aware of a password change attempt. The
credentials are in a sysin
and even though the racf id is protected (no password) the ndm statements in
the sysin has
included
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 09:21:59 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
I have an outlying case to test my understanding:
// SET FOO='WOM'
// SET BAR=BAT
// SET WOMBAT='SDB=YES'
//*
//STEP EXEC PGM=IEBGENER,PARMDD=SYSUT1
//SYSUT2DD SYSOUT=(,)
//SYSUT1DD *,SYMBOLS=JCL
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:28:57 +0100, Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
wrote:
I'm running a residency in the Autumn on 2.1 code (and you'll see an
announcement as this one is expected to welcome customer etc nominations
shortly). I mention this because Symbol Substitution via PARMDD is quite
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 07:29:11 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 06:47:01 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
Peter's most recent response:
begin extract
The 100 character restriction is applied to the following case, only:
environment is APF; and jobstep program is
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:18:48 -0400, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net wrote:
In the long term, of course, RACF will surely change to allow phrases
to be as short as anyone likes, subject only to installation control,
and passwords to be optional, and then we'll have by a very long and
roundabout
On 22 March 2013 14:50, EXT-Schwarz, Barry barry.schw...@boeing.com wrote:
My mistake about after. How about during? On the TSO logon panel, if you
enter the correct passphrase, do you also
need to enter the current password when you enter a new password? I would
test it but we don't
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:44:41 -0400, Keith Smith keith.sm...@shawinc.com wrote:
I stand corrected. The password is, in fact, the default group. There are
way too many gotchas popping up... What happens if the password is expired?
Will the password phrase still work? I guess I should test this too.
Barry Schwarz wrote:
Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
To avoid this exposure always enter a password value and never tell your
users what the password is.
Except the user can usually change his password after he has logged on with
the phrase.
Really? How would he do that, if he doesn't know
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 18:31:15 +, Robert Prins robert.ah.pr...@gmail.com
wrote:
DOWN works without problems.
If the penultimate line of the logical screen has an underlined sequence
number,
indicating that it's followed by hidden excluded lines, and the cursor is on
the
very last line of
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 21:14:13 +0800, Robin Atwod abend...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a rather arcane topic but hopefully one of you out there might have
some insight. I am working on a problem where a customer uses our
application to submit jobs to JES2, and then, when the output is available,
the
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 08:51:34 -0500, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
I come now to Tony Harminc's example:
begin extract
But SETRP generates a NOPR with an expression (related to the SDWA, I think)
obviously intended (and I think commented) to fail if the length is
not 0. However HLASM
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:59:58 +0530, saurabh khandelwal
sourabhkhandelwal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Walt,
I am running this program under z/OS 1.13 system only.
My concern doesn't affect you; the reply was specific to Steve, who is testing
with IEBCOPY.
Your problem should
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:14:52 -0500, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
I have experimented with this number---Note that it includes
professional development, e.g., journal reading, web browsing, meeting
attendance and the like, things that are not immediately relevant to
the task at hand
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:26:41 -0600, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, just put an expiration time as part of a file name and you can patent
it? These people have their head where the sun don't shine. OK, maybe
nobody else has done this _exact_ thing. But, really? Of course, in
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:32:46 -0800, retired mainframer
retired-mainfra...@q.com wrote:
It is also possible for the RACF resource owner of a dataset (specified in
the RESOWNER field of the DFP operand on the ADDSD command) to have a
default data class (specified in the DATACLASS field of the DFP
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:11:03 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 07:49:27 -0600, John McKown wrote:
Another possible solution, which I did with different IBM module, is to
write a small HLASM program. This program would verify how it was called by
looking at the
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:32:36 -0800, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
This is a theoretical question. I am *not* an Endevor user. I am trying to
solve a *similar* problem and this is the best way to explain it.
Here's the question: at shops that use Endevor for all compiles, how do you
lock
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 08:04:20 -0600, Kevin Minerley k60ek...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I think you should be able to get to unresolved reference at:
z/OS V1R13.0 ISPF Services Guide IBM Library Server -
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:16:52 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:16:38 +0200, גדי בן אבי wrote:
o IBM plans to remove support for unsecured FTP connections used for z/OS
software and service delivery October 1, 2013. At that time, it is planned
that new
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:27:18 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:57:41 -0600, Walt Farrell wrote:
... new System z software (products and service) downloads will require
the use of FTPS (FTP using Secure Sockets Layer) or of Download Director
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:51:49 -0500, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com wrote:
_Apple Q1 2013 hardware sales: By the numbers | ZDNet_
(http://www.zdnet.com/apple-q1-2013-hardware-sales-by-the-numbers-710258/)
So grasshopper, how's you mobile app on Z?
This grasshopper is tempted to wonder why
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:47:13 +0100, Boris Lenz boris.l...@ims.sells.ch wrote:
I can't get an FTP PUT to work with dataset names that contain a dollar
sign (x'5B', which is the pound sign on the target system).
Source system is z/OS, codepage IBM-500
Target system is z/OS, codepage IBM-285
FTP
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:39:11 -0800, Phil Smith p...@voltage.com wrote:
Mark Jacobs wrote:
I've been reading the ICSF Applications Programmers guide and I understand
the process on how to transport ICSF keys to another zOS system using
importer/exporter keys, but I have no idea on how it would
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:04:30 -0800, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
I've got a dataset that has been mangled through some misguided efforts such
that original record boundaries have been lost. It used to be RECFM=V and
now it is RECFM=F
You did not say how it was mangled, and that can be
On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 16:24:34 +0100, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
BTW: I'm signed to both portals. Redalert is better, because it notifies
me by email about news (no details in the mail AFAIR), but security
portal does not send notifications. Maybe this is matter of some
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:38:14 -0600, Robert Carballo
robert.carba...@officedepot.com wrote:
Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
Here is the link explaining the issue:
https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21620945
I did some searching but can't seem to really find details about
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 07:42:34 +0100, ibmmain nitz-...@gmx.net wrote:
I have also seen this happen with IBMUSER, and the colleague doing the ftp
swears that he didn't use IBMUSER for his ftp.
If this was for an inbound FTP session, do you have the FTP server configured
to run as IBMUSER?
--
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 11:30:24 -0800, Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
wrote:
I never saw a reply to Lizette's post. We also have an interest in the
same topic. We want to encourage members of the technical staff to manage
our sandbox LPARs rather than pester--er, request--Operations to shut
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:16:06 -0800, Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
wrote:
As for the need to check SAF: if HMC provided full granularity of access
control, we wouldn't even need BCPii. We could just let all Tech Support
folks get to HMC and let him enforce the rules: allow Tech Support
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:04:00 -0600, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
I double checked and SVC 99 has two keys, DALEXPDT DALEXPDL, to assign
expiration dates. It would be very helpful to me if BPXWDYN could use these as
well because I want the equivalent of EXPDT=99000 for
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 01:33:00 -0500, micheal butz michealb...@optonline.net
wrote:
SRB's are documented in CHapter 9 of The Authorized Assembler Guide
I did a search using keyword subpool and came up with no hits for
chapter 9
search on keyword storage yielded 3 hits for chapter 9 none of which
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:30:11 -0600, Donald Likens dlik...@infosecinc.com
wrote:
My memory objects are much smaller than 1M and I do not want to do my own
storage management (braking up the
megabyte of storage).
How were you planning on handling storage management within the data space you
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:05:10 +0100, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl
wrote:
In general you are 100% right.
However many people use PROGRAM class only to fulfill requirements of
TCPIP setup and other stuff.
In this case they define CL(PROGRAM) ** profile and and several
IBM-z/OS-provided
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 13:46:22 +0100, ibmmain nitz-...@gmx.net wrote:
thanks for the confirmation. But: I have no clue how to run an experiment on
this. I guess I'll be keeping what's left in
the program class. (The * profile with certain data sets that I have shown).
The experiment is simple,
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 08:20:28 +0100, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
BTW: IMHO BASIC mode is quite good mode, you don't have to move to
EHANCED mode just because such mode exists.
Sorry, Radoslaw, but even though I'm not an IBMer any more, I have to disagree
with you.
As the
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 12:08:32 +0100, ibmmain nitz-...@gmx.net wrote:
RACF use the best match principle. If it can't find a matching
profile/member, it will move on to profiles with wildcards:
So, for example, it will move from profile XYZ to XY* to X* to *.
If no match are found, a default
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 09:19:48 -0400, micheal butz michealb...@optonline.net
wrote:
TSOLIB activate myloadlb
I remember once debugging ISPF programs the way I should you in the
example
TESTAUTH 'LOADLIB(ISPF)' CP
then Load myloadlib(commandprocessor)
set breakpoints on commandprocessor
type
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 00:43:21 -0400, micheal butz michealb...@optonline.net
wrote:
Hi,
I am running a TSO command processor which needs to be APF authorized
The load library is in PROG00 marked as APF authorized
The command name is both in AUTHPGM and AUTHNAMES in IKJTSO00
I know that
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 01:05:26 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 00:25:32 -0500, Kenneth J. Kripke wrote:
DATA AT PSW 0001CE48 - 58101000 0A6B5023
Data shows a MODESET SVC which does require authorization.
Check the AUTHPGM specifications in IKJTSOxx in
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:53:01 -0700, retired mainframer
retired-mainfra...@q.com wrote:
Both MXG (which requires SAS) and RACFICE (from SAMPLIB) provide the
capability to adjust the selection criteria to anything you wish.
But this assumes the data of interest is actually recorded. I found
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:51:33 -0500, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
Also, remember that we are talking about TSO. An archaic piece of software,
which IBM has just seeming lost interest in. Imagine what could
be done if the non-APF user code ran in a subspace, like CICS uses.
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 08:41:57 -0500, Victor Zhang victor_wor...@yahoo.com.cn
wrote:
Can I interpret this to get non-vsam used or allocated size?
DSCBTTR TTR of format-1 DSCB for non-VSAM data set
No. IGGCSI00 simply returns information from the catalog. DSCBs are in the
VTOC, not the catalog.
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 16:49:13 -0400, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
Joel,
Hers the exact error:
11.51.03 STC00472 CSV025I PROGRAM CONTROLLED MODULE ADDUSER NOT ACCESSED, USE
11.51.03 STC00472 IEF196I CSV025I PROGRAM CONTROLLED MODULE ADDUSER NOT ACCES
11.51.03 STC00472 IEF196I
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 08:18:11 -0700, Mark Yuhas mark.yu...@paccar.com wrote:
Prior to Windows 7, the VIEW tab had a detail setting that would dispay
the title. Windows 7 doesn't work that way for me.
Have you made sure that in Windows Explorer, View-Show Details, that you have
selected the
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 05:44:37 -0500, Donald Likens dlik...@infosecinc.com
wrote:
I've been looking through the books but have not found a detail mapping macro
for the RACF SMF type 80 relocation sections. I'll keep looking but in the
mean time, does anyone know what and where they are?
Note: I
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:46:43 -0400, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am in the process of wanting to call idcams, principally, a define and
delete alias function in Assembler. I have looked at IGGCSI00 and various
examples, it doesn't appear I can use IGGCSI00 for this purpose. Can
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:58:58 -0500, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
Another possibility (not sure) is to set up a TSO environment in your code
using IKJTSOEV and then invoking a REXX program to issue the
TSO commands. I don't know if this will work. And, IMO, it is
401 - 453 of 453 matches
Mail list logo
