Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA) wrote:
>Thank you - I've come to the conclusion that we should be in a single sysplex
>so we have grs protecting every device.
Ok. Abadon grey hairs! ;-)
Just have your Prod ready and then add one LPAR at a stage from the test Plex.
You could perhaps prepare your HSM,
. (TRA)
Sent: 04 April, 2016 19:46
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Advice needed - GRS across 2 sysplexes with shared
dasd
Thank you - I've come to the conclusion that we should be in a single sysplex
so we have grs protecting every device. Now the discussion begins
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Joseph W Gentile
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 12:41 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Advice needed - GRS across 2 sysplexes with shared
> dasd
>
> Hello Lionel,
>
> Regarding your OP, GRS ENQs ar
ject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Advice needed - GRS across 2 sysplexes with shared dasd
Hello Lionel,
Regarding your OP, GRS ENQs are generally obtained at the GRS complex level, by
various operating system programs and other applications that do I/O. GRS only
knows about its own complex, not another GRS com
2016 1:48 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Advice needed - GRS across 2 sysplexes with
> shared dasd
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Gibney, David Allen <gib...@wsu.edu>
> wrote:
>
> > I only shared a minimum set of volumes. Vary
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Gibney, David Allen wrote:
> I only shared a minimum set of volumes. Vary offline commands in COMMNDxx.
> Very few, if any PDS/E on these volumes and all are read-only after
> creation.
>
> This COBOL-5 requirement for a PDS/E load library will
iscussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Martin Packer
> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 9:40 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Advice needed - GRS across 2 sysplexes with
> shared dasd
>
> Arguably there is no such thing as a "
On 4/1/2016 7:00 AM, Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA) wrote:
An unintentional repeat. And yes the PDSE's along with all datasets are shared
between both sysplexes as all dasd is shared. Not ideal but it is what it is
so I was looking for a solution.
PDSE sharing depends on sysplex services, and not
ring
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of R.S.
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 9:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Advice needed - GRS across 2 sysplexes with shared
dasd
W dniu 2016-04-01 o 16:09, Dyck, Li
W dniu 2016-04-01 o 16:09, Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA) pisze:
I was hoping there was a way for GRS to span multiple sysplexes - apparently it
can't - but that is a question worth asking.
It is possible to have GRS complex that span sysplexes, but:
1. It is VERY unrecommended for some importnat
W dniu 2016-04-01 o 16:00, Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA) pisze:
An unintentional repeat. And yes the PDSE's along with all datasets are shared
between both sysplexes as all dasd is shared. Not ideal but it is what it is
so I was looking for a solution.
The ONLY solution is STOP SHARING all
ject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Advice needed - GRS across 2 sysplexes with shared
dasd
Arguably there is no such thing as a "read only data set". It must've got
written to (at least) once (or be empty). Maybe CURRENTLY it's not being
written to. But when it was the damage cou
us Engelbrecht <elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 01/04/2016 15:24
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Advice needed - GRS across 2 sysplexes
with shared dasd
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
D
Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA) wrote:
>An unintentional repeat.
It is all right. It seemed you got caught in this bad situation.
>The original PDSE issue was a PDSE was being read (no updates) on both
>sysplexes and it became corrupted. I was asked about PDSE protection for a
>new project and that
:01
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Advice needed - GRS across 2 sysplexes with shared
dasd
An unintentional repeat. And yes the PDSE's along with all datasets are shared
between both sysplexes as all dasd is shared. Not ideal but it is what it is
so I was looking
IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 9:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Advice needed - GRS across 2 sysplexes with shared
dasd
So then the problem is solved, you do somet
5 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Advice needed - GRS across 2 sysplexes with shared dasd
Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA) wrote:
>The reason for the questioning is that there are PDSE's that are access from
>both sysplexes, since the dasd/catalogs, are shared that have gone b
17 matches
Mail list logo