Re: 3390 Mod54 for sys volumes

2012-10-10 Thread Skip Robinson
Technology Services Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 626-302-7535 Office 323-715-0595 Mobile jo.skip.robin...@sce.com From: "Pew, Curtis G" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date: 10/10/2012 07:45 AM Subject: Re: 3390 Mod54 for sys volumes Sent by:

Re: 3390 Mod54 for sys volumes

2012-10-10 Thread Pew, Curtis G
On Oct 10, 2012, at 8:12 AM, CAPRON Romain wrote: > We want to minimize the number different geometry for our dasd. We're asking > if it's reasonable to only use mod54 dasd. > More and more people say that with modern dasd storage, it's no more usefull > to work with 3390-9 and 3390-27... > All

Re: 3390 Mod54 for sys volumes

2012-10-10 Thread Lizette Koehler
t; Behalf > Of CAPRON Romain > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 6:12 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: 3390 Mod54 for sys volumes > > Hi, > > We want to minimize the number different geometry for our dasd. We're asking > if it's > reasonable t

3390 Mod54 for sys volumes

2012-10-10 Thread CAPRON Romain
Hi, We want to minimize the number different geometry for our dasd. We're asking if it's reasonable to only use mod54 dasd. More and more people say that with modern dasd storage, it's no more usefull to work with 3390-9 and 3390-27... All of your dasd are pprc"ed" Thanks in advance for your fe