On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 20:19:35 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
>
> > You really need to come up to speed on modern opcodes. All of the
> performance
> > improvements are in new opcodes; the old
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 20:19:35 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
> You really need to come up to speed on modern opcodes. All of the performance
> improvements are in new opcodes; the old ones aren't getting any faster.
> There is some cool stuff, ...
On 2016-12-09, at 09:56, Farley, Peter x23353
m: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ed Jaffe
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2016 9:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ASMA032E Relocatable value or unresolved symbol found when
absolute value required
On 12/28/2016 8:27 AM, Charles Mills
On 12/28/2016 8:27 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
Well, I did learn something. I did not know that relative instructions could be
"relocated" by the binder.
Yes, since z/OS 1.7 I believe. We take advantage of that in a few places.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview
arles
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Tom Marchant
> Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2016 7:42 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: ASMA032E Relocatable value or un
2016 at 7:01 PM, Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote:
>
> > Why won't this assemble?
> >
> > SOME CSECT
> > LLILF 2,FOO
> > OTHER CSECT
> > FOO EQU *
> >
> > Why do I get ASMA032E Relocatable value or unresolved symbol found w
ember 28, 2016 7:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ASMA032E Relocatable value or unresolved symbol found when
absolute value required
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 07:01:22 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
>> Is that an attempt to use LLILF to do accomplish what LARL does?
>
>That's
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote:
> Why won't this assemble?
>
> SOME CSECT
> LLILF 2,FOO
> OTHER CSECT
> FOO EQU *
>
> Why do I get ASMA032E Relocatable value or unresolved symbol found when
> absolut
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 07:01:22 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
>> Is that an attempt to use LLILF to do accomplish what LARL does?
>
>That's not what I am attempting. LARL will not work -- unless I am mistaken
I believe you are mistaken. You may need to use GOFF.
>-- if the relationship between the
:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2016 5:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ASMA032E Relocatable value or unresolved symbol found when
absolute value required
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 15:44:44 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 15:44:44 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:52:26 -0800 Charles Mills wrote:
>
>:>I guess the answer is found in the Assembler manual: "Immediate data must be
>:>specified as absolute expressions whose range of values depends on the
>:>machine instruction
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 17:01:40 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
>Why won't this assemble?
>
>SOME CSECT
> LLILF 2,FOO
>OTHER CSECT
>FOO EQU *
What do you expect to be in register 2 after the LLILF?
--
Tom Marchant
--
For
UA.EDU] On
:>Behalf Of Charles Mills
:>Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2016 5:02 PM
:>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:>Subject: ASMA032E Relocatable value or unresolved symbol found when absolute
:>value required
:>
:>Why won't this assemble?
:>
:>SOME CSECT
:> LLILF
> Charles
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2016 5:32 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: ASMA032E Relocatable value or unresolved symbol found wh
aul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2016 7:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ASMA032E Relocatable value or unresolved symbol found when
absolute value required
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:45:58 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
>
>> Since they're in different CSECTs, the assembl
FOO
>> OTHER CSECT
>> FOO EQU *
>>
>> Why do I get ASMA032E Relocatable value or unresolved symbol found
>> when absolute value required - FOO?
... or we can wait for Lizette to tell you to take this to ASSEMBLER-LIST.
-- gil
--
rame Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2016 5:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: ASMA032E Relocatable value or unresolved symbol found when absolute
value required
Why won't this assemble?
SOME CSECT
LLILF 2,FOO
O
16 5:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ASMA032E Relocatable value or unresolved symbol found when
absolute value required
On 2016-12-27 18:01, Charles Mills wrote:
> Why won't this assemble?
>
> SOME CSECT
> LLILF 2,FOO
> OTHER CSECT
> FOO EQU *
>
&g
On 2016-12-27 18:01, Charles Mills wrote:
> Why won't this assemble?
>
> SOME CSECT
> LLILF 2,FOO
> OTHER CSECT
> FOO EQU *
>
> Why do I get ASMA032E Relocatable value or unresolved symbol found when
> absolute value required - FOO?
>
> Can't the
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 17:01:40 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
>Why won't this assemble?
>
>SOME CSECT
> LLILF 2,FOO
>OTHER CSECT
>FOO EQU *
>
>Why do I get ASMA032E Relocatable value or unresolved symbol found when
>absolute value required - FOO?
>
>Can't the
value or unresolved symbol found when
absolute value required - FOO?
Can't the assembler generate a relocatable address constant for the
immediate operand of LLILF? Or am I doing something stupid that I am not
seeing?
DC A(FOO) at the same spot assembles with no problem. I could presumably
code DC
Why won't this assemble?
SOME CSECT
LLILF 2,FOO
OTHER CSECT
FOO EQU *
Why do I get ASMA032E Relocatable value or unresolved symbol found when
absolute value required - FOO?
Can't the assembler generate a relocatable address constant for the
immediate operand of LLILF? Or am I doing
22 matches
Mail list logo
