On 2012-06-20 17:13, McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Gord Tomlin
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 3:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Calling idcams
One could argue that creating LE
Subject: Calling idcams
All,
I am in the process of wanting to call idcams, principally, a
define and delete alias function in Assembler. I have looked
at IGGCSI00 and various examples, it doesn't appear I can use
IGGCSI00 for this purpose. Can someone point the correct direction
Insurance Company.SM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Scott Ford
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 9:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Calling idcams
All,
I am in the process of wanting to call idcams
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:46:43 -0400, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am in the process of wanting to call idcams, principally, a define and
delete alias function in Assembler. I have looked at IGGCSI00 and various
examples, it doesn't appear I can use IGGCSI00 for this purpose. Can
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:58:58 -0500, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
Another possibility (not sure) is to set up a TSO environment in your code
using IKJTSOEV and then invoking a REXX program to issue the
TSO commands. I don't know if this will work. And, IMO, it is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 10:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Calling idcams
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:58:58 -0500, McKown, John wrote
In e52f4f44-5cae-479f-92cb-c156fdfa3...@yahoo.com, on 06/20/2012
at 10:46 AM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com said:
I am in the process of wanting to call idcams, principally, a
define and delete alias function in Assembler. I have looked at
IGGCSI00 and various examples, it doesn't appear
One could argue that creating LE enabled programs would not be very
standard. You'd be challenged to find any UNIX implementation that
could run LE enabled programs, other than the one we try to avoid
calling USS!
From a GCC perspective, one would normally expect to produce programs
that
Gord,
Not sure what you saying, all COBOL is LE now...Assembler you can choose, C , I
am not knowledgable in enough to say..
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Jun 20, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Gord Tomlin gt.ibm.li...@actionsoftware.com
wrote:
One could argue that creating LE enabled programs
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Gord Tomlin
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 3:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Calling idcams
One could argue that creating LE enabled programs would not be very
Shmuel,
I want sure and wanted to ask. All the examples I saw in rexx,assembler and
COBOL all did searches , I figured it was a search only..
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Jun 20, 2012, at 1:54 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+...@patriot.net wrote:
In
11 matches
Mail list logo