Re: Commands from systsin

to buy it Thank you -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Cole Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2023 6:26 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Commands from systsin At 9/13/2023 12:52 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote: >But I want to de

Re: Commands from systsin

marc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2023 12:57:37 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Commands from systsin Why does it have to be in your private storage? What is wrong with CSVDYLPA? -- Tom Marchant On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:03:25 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrot

Re: Commands from systsin

Why does it have to be in your private storage? What is wrong with CSVDYLPA? -- Tom Marchant On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:03:25 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote: >I would like to debug my subsystem function under TESTAUTH towards that end >I need it in private storage for the duration of my time

Re: Commands from systsin

I would like to debug my subsystem function under TESTAUTH towards that end I need it in private storage for the duration of my time logged on to TSO in between sessions of TESTAUTH I’m schedirb to load the routine and have the TCB ptr point to IKJEFT01 aka TCBJSTCB Thanks On Thu, Sep 14, 2023

Re: Commands from systsin

Please stay away from LOAD GLOBAL=YES. In almost all circumstances where the loading address space can terminate, this can lead to a system integrity exposure. Specifically, you would have to be able to ensure with 100% certainty that no program in any other address space is executing within

Re: Commands from systsin

Would a *home-address-space-level name/token pair* name token work? On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 11:24, David Cole wrote: > At 9/13/2023 11:12 AM, Joe wrote: > >Seems then the only to do what I want is schedule an IRB with the

Re: Commands from systsin

At 9/13/2023 12:52 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote: But I want to debug the function routine under TEST/TESTAUTH Joe, If we offered an inexpensive "personal License" for z/XDC, Would you be interested? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe /

Re: Commands from systsin

At 9/13/2023 11:12 AM, Joe wrote: Seems then the only to do what I want is schedule an IRB with the TCB being IKJEFT01 Thank might work. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Re: Commands from systsin

WRT "Dave.C, may you live forever"... I'll drink to that! At 9/13/2023 04:01 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: Noobies who don't want to know history and the like, just delete this As to z/XDC and priv code and/or key zero storage -- oh the ease and joy of not being forced to use TEST Auth.

Re: Commands from systsin

Of Joseph Reichman Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 4:21 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Commands from systsin Last time I visited IDF didn’t debug code in supervisor state > On Sep 13, 2023, at 4:02 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: > > Noobies who don't want to kno

Re: Commands from systsin

Last time I visited IDF didn’t debug code in supervisor state > On Sep 13, 2023, at 4:02 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: > > Noobies who don't want to know history and the like, just delete this > > As to z/XDC and priv code and/or key zero storage -- oh the ease and joy of > not being forced

Re: Commands from systsin

Noobies who don't want to know history and the like, just delete this As to z/XDC and priv code and/or key zero storage -- oh the ease and joy of not being forced to use TEST Auth. Or having to set some SLIP, get a dump, or do SNAPs... I wish I could be cursed with having to use z/XDC

Re: Commands from systsin

List On Behalf Of Joseph Reichman Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 3:48 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Commands from systsin I don’t have the $10,000 or so to purchase it If it was a reasonable price for Zpdt user I would consider it I need the program in storage area

Re: Commands from systsin

I don’t have the $10,000 or so to purchase it If it was a reasonable price for Zpdt user I would consider it I need the program in storage area that TESTAUTH will let me set a breakpoint I think my method should work Will try it later > On Sep 13, 2023, at 3:40 PM, Tom Marchant >

Re: Commands from systsin

>only TESTAUTH let’s you debug code with PSW bit 15 being 0 Obviously you haven't tried z/XDC. >All I want is to debug a program that was preloaded under a different TCB Have you considered using CSVDYLPA to load in into dynamic LPA? Probably overkill for your purposes, but you can do it so

Re: Commands from systsin

it. > > IIRC, ASMIDF even has the ability to debug authorized code, but check the > manual to be sure. > > Peter > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of > Joseph Reichman > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 12:52 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.

Re: Commands from systsin

@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Commands from systsin Let me explain I’m only doing this for testing purposes I am writing a subsystem so normally the function routines would be in global But I want to debug the function routine under TEST/TESTAUTH So the subsystem initialization routine is going

Re: Commands from systsin

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 10:10:42AM -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote: > I have a number of program that I would like to stay resident in the > job pack are of my tso session > > So I run a command from systsin in my tso session that command all it > does is loads A few load modules and wto s the

Re: Commands from systsin

y, September 13, 2023 11:12 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Commands from systsin > > Seems then the only to do what I want is schedule an IRB with the TCB being > IKJEFT01 > > ? > >> On Sep 13, 2023, at 11:09 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: >>

Re: Commands from systsin

I advise against it. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Joseph Reichman Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 11:12 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Commands from systsin Seems then the only to do what I want is schedule an IRB

Re: Commands from systsin

On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:12:30 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote: >Seems then the only to do what I want is schedule an IRB with the TCB being >IKJEFT01 >? > Can you ATTACH your other programs from the task that performs the LOAD? >> >> From: Joseph Reichman

Re: Commands from systsin

___ > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of > Joseph Reichman > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 10:10 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Commands from systsin > > Hi > > I have a number of program that I would like to stay resident in th

Re: Commands from systsin

The modules are deleted from storage when the command complete, as part of task cleanup. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Joseph Reichman Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 10:10 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Commands from

Re: Commands from systsin

You might have to be sneaky. If your setup has a command run from TSO before ISPF (something like A.CLIST(#LOGON)) you should be able to run code that loads your stuff before it starts ISPF (PDF, ISPSTART or whatever). On my MVS 3.8 system at IPL I run something that loads 3 routines into LPA,

Commands from systsin

Hi I have a number of program that I would like to stay resident in the job pack are of my tso session So I run a command from systsin in my tso session that command all it does is loads A few load modules and wto s the address Will they remain in core until I log off I mean I’m assuming