On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 08:27, John McKown wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 7:18 AM Raphael Jacquot wrote:
> > did the competition (amdahl & others) had a "license" to produce mainframes
> > ?
>
> Good question. I was told that the 3rd party CPU hardware parties quit when
> XA came out do to
smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
John McKown
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 8:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: IBM "opens" OpenPower ISA
https://secu
r analyses I have seen where the raised floor,
power, AC,... were all allocated to the MF.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
John McKown
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 11:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM "opens" OpenPo
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:26 AM Gary Gregory <
gary.greg...@dino-software.com> wrote:
> I thought the 3rd parties dropped out when the z/Architecture 64-bit was
> announced.
>
> I read somewhere, years ago, it was going to a $1B investment for the PCM
> manufactures to develop and offer a 64-bit
kef>
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Dana Mitchell
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 7:45:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM "opens" OpenPower ISA
It was much later than XA, I think they probably couldn't get the license for
the 64 bit implementatio
It was much later than XA, I think they probably couldn't get the license for
the 64 bit implementation. We installed a Hitachi Pilot CPU in 1999, and
after that they came out with the Skyline series of machines.
Dana
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 07:27:15 -0500, John McKown
wrote:
>
>Good
Yes, is the very short answer.
Tony Thigpen
Raphael Jacquot wrote on 8/22/19 8:18 AM:
On 8/22/19 2:07 PM, John McKown wrote:
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/08/20/ibm_openpower_isa/
Basically, from what I read, this means that other companies can produce
competing chips which implement
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 7:18 AM Raphael Jacquot wrote:
> On 8/22/19 2:07 PM, John McKown wrote:
> > https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/08/20/ibm_openpower_isa/
> >
> > Basically, from what I read, this means that other companies can produce
> > competing chips which implement the Power ISA,
On 8/22/19 2:07 PM, John McKown wrote:
> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/08/20/ibm_openpower_isa/
>
> Basically, from what I read, this means that other companies can produce
> competing chips which implement the Power ISA, without requiring a license.
> It is more likely that the Sun will
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/08/20/ibm_openpower_isa/
Basically, from what I read, this means that other companies can produce
competing chips which implement the Power ISA, without requiring a license.
It is more likely that the Sun will become a supernova than IBM would
"open" the IBM z
10 matches
Mail list logo
