Gadi,
WE have verified that OPS/MVS has successfully removed the message from the
console and SYSLOG.
The next issue you have is the JOBLOG and JESMSGLG for the STC CA Spool.
OPS/MVS can do some things with Routecde that might eliminate the issue.
However, you might also look at the SPIN
From my reading, the message occurs because more than one DCB is OPEN to
the same DD name, and that DD was allocated with FREE=CLOSE. We get the
same message from CA-JMR. The only solution is to ding CA to fix their
code. Which will likely get rejected as Working As Designed. Which might
mean that
We had the same IEC988I problem in two of our products (SyzSPOOL/z, which
processes the Spool just like CA-Spool, and SyzAUTO/z, which is our job and
task scheduler) on z/os version 1.12 and up. The issue was because of a coding
error where we had specified FREE=CLOSE within our code. Telling
Hi,
Since upgrading to z/OS 1.13 (our previous version was 1.11), We’re receiving
many IEC988I messages issued by CA-SPOOL (v11.7).
The response from CA was that there was a change made in z/OS 1.12, and this
message occurs because CA-SPOOL is attempting to close a library that is still
, October 10, 2013 12:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: IC988I messages issued by CA-SPOOL
Hi,
Since upgrading to z/OS 1.13 (our previous version was 1.11), We're
receiving many IEC988I messages issued by CA-SPOOL (v11.7).
The response from CA was that there was a change made in z/OS 1.12
Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 2:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IC988I messages issued by CA-SPOOL
Gadi
I am not sure why OPS/MVS (I am guessing OPS is OPS/MVS) did
'SYS1.PARMLIB(MPFLSTxx)'
snip
Since upgrading to z/OS 1.13 (our previous version was 1.11), We're receiving
many IEC988I messages issued by CA-SPOOL (v11.7).
The response from CA was that there was a change made in z/OS 1.12, and this
message occurs because CA-SPOOL is attempting to close a
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of ??? ?? ???
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 4:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IC988I messages issued by CA-SPOOL
Once I strip all of the comments from the OPS Rule, which was created by
EASYRULE, I get:
)MSG IEC988I
)PROC
: IC988I messages issued by CA-SPOOL
In easy rule you can set several suppression.
Suppress from Console,
Suppress from Syslog
And so forth.
Do you want only console, syslog or both?
Second thing you can do is go to OPSBROWSE (Option 1) and filter on IEC988I.
Put your cursor on the IEC988I and see
Subject: Re: IC988I messages issued by CA-SPOOL
In easy rule you can set several suppression.
Suppress from Console,
Suppress from Syslog
And so forth.
Do you want only console, syslog or both?
Second thing you can do is go to OPSBROWSE (Option 1) and filter on IEC988I.
Put your cursor
: Re: IC988I messages issued by CA-SPOOL
And I think it should have been
Return SUPPRESS
Not
Return DELETE
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 6:50 AM
To: IBM
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IC988I messages issued by CA-SPOOL
Once I strip all of the comments from the OPS Rule, which was created by
EASYRULE, I get:
)MSG IEC988I
)PROC
Return DELETE
Doesn't get any simpler than that, but still the messages keep being
displayed.
I added a trace command to the rule
12 matches
Mail list logo
