Re: Invoking IFASMFDP utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ?

2020-12-03 Thread Mike Hochee
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Invoking IFASMFDP utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ? Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization. It probably doesn't apply to this case, but if the documentation for a service says "invoke it this way" (and I don't just mean a "

Re: Invoking IFASMFDP utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ?

2020-12-03 Thread Peter Relson
It probably doesn't apply to this case, but if the documentation for a service says "invoke it this way" (and I don't just mean a "recommendation" or a "suggestion") and you choose to try something else that you think is equivalent, you are in unsupported territory. Do what you will; the risk

Re: Invoking IFASMFDP utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ?

2020-12-02 Thread Mike Hochee
utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ? Warning! This is a fake (spoofed) message. DO NOT TRUST! Wondering if anyone has attempted to invoke the SMF IFASMFDP utility (handles dumping and clearing of SMF data set logs, digital signature validation, etc.) via program invocation using CALL, LINK, or ATTACH

Re: Invoking IFASMFDP utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ?

2020-12-02 Thread Tom Brennan
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Hochee Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 11:25 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Invoking IFASMFDP utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ? Wondering if anyone has attempted to invoke the SMF IFASMFDP utility (handl

Re: Invoking IFASMFDP utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ?

2020-12-02 Thread Joe Monk
The IBM recommended way to run IFASMFDP is via the IEFU29 exit https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ieae400/ieae40040.htm Joe On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 1:25 AM Mike Hochee wrote: > Wondering if anyone has attempted to invoke the SMF IFASMFDP utility >

Re: Invoking IFASMFDP utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ?

2020-12-02 Thread Seymour J Metz
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Charles Mills [charl...@mcn.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 11:54 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Invoking IFASMFDP utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ? When you invoke it from JCL

Re: Invoking IFASMFDP utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ?

2020-12-02 Thread Charles Mills
ERV.UA.EDU Subject: Invoking IFASMFDP utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ? Wondering if anyone has attempted to invoke the SMF IFASMFDP utility (handles dumping and clearing of SMF data set logs, digital signature validation, etc.) via program invocation using CALL, LINK, or ATTACH? Some of the dfp

Re: Invoking IFASMFDP utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ?

2020-12-02 Thread Matthew Stitt
Of course. Do it all the time. Look in the CBT tape for program SMFDUMP. Matthew On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 07:25:02 +, Mike Hochee wrote: >Wondering if anyone has attempted to invoke the SMF IFASMFDP utility (handles >dumping and clearing of SMF data set logs, digital signature validation,

Re: Invoking IFASMFDP utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ?

2020-12-02 Thread Seymour J Metz
...@aspg.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 2:25 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Invoking IFASMFDP utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ? Wondering if anyone has attempted to invoke the SMF IFASMFDP utility (handles dumping and clearing of SMF data set logs, digital signature validation, etc

Invoking IFASMFDP utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ?

2020-12-01 Thread Mike Hochee
Wondering if anyone has attempted to invoke the SMF IFASMFDP utility (handles dumping and clearing of SMF data set logs, digital signature validation, etc.) via program invocation using CALL, LINK, or ATTACH? Some of the dfp utilities allow dynamic invocation from a program, and for those some