Re: Migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2

2016-06-02 Thread Salva Carrasco
- Yes, ARCH(11) for z13 - We found a program (only one) that needed 1.7GB to compile. And a lot of them requiring up to 600MB. So we use REGION=0M & IEFUSI. - CANCEL sentence when mixing 4.2 & 5.2 do not free used memory under certain circumstances. We opened some PMR about this, but still

Re: Migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2

2016-06-01 Thread Mike Schwab
You will need to maintain compatibility with your lowest level of hardware, prime or DR. On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Bill Woodger wrote: > Why wouldn't ARCH(11) give the best performance? V5.2 has it? Of course, has > to be for a z13. > > I'm not sure what you mean

Migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2

2016-06-01 Thread Bill Woodger
Why wouldn't ARCH(11) give the best performance? V5.2 has it? Of course, has to be for a z13. I'm not sure what you mean about REGION=0M. At least 200M will be needed, more for large programs. See here:

Migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2

2016-06-01 Thread Bill Woodger
Are there no internal IBM methods of asking? There's the COBOL Cafe at the Compile Cafe: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/forums/html/forum?id=----2281, a couple of compiler developers visit. There's also some advice posted there, and elsewhere. If the

Re: Migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2

2016-06-01 Thread Salva Carrasco
- Test(DWARF): Increase size in library but not in memory, debug data is only loaded at error/abend time. - Best CPU usage if using Arch(9/10) on execution. - Worst compile CPU/Time/Storage. REGION=0M, IEFUSI, ... - Take an eye on latest maintenance, specially LE. - Be aware of Arch level for

Re: Migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2

2016-06-01 Thread Mike Schwab
t; On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Paul Strauss <strau...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >>> My customer wants to start the migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2. I know >>> V6.1 is out but we need to get going on this project. I have deleted all >>> COBOL compilers below Enterprise

Re: Migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2

2016-06-01 Thread Frank Swarbrick
:40:42 -0400 > From: strau...@us.ibm.com > Subject: Migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2 > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > My customer wants to start the migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2. I know > V6.1 is out but we need to get going on this project. I have deleted all &g

Re: Migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2

2016-06-01 Thread Itschak Mugzach
ive, so more core means faster / > less CPU programs, at expense of more memory / I/O. > >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Paul Strauss <strau...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> My customer wants to start the migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2. I know >> V6.1 is out but we need to

Re: Migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2

2016-06-01 Thread Mike Schwab
to start the migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2. I know > V6.1 is out but we need to get going on this project. I have deleted all > COBOL compilers below Enterprise COBOL V4.2 from their systems. I worked > with an applications representative and they have decided on the compiler > options th

Migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2

2016-06-01 Thread Paul Strauss
My customer wants to start the migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2. I know V6.1 is out but we need to get going on this project. I have deleted all COBOL compilers below Enterprise COBOL V4.2 from their systems. I worked with an applications representative and they have decided on the compiler