On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Greg Dyck wrote:
> On 6/21/2016 1:11 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>
>> After the discussion, I went ahead and put in a RFE for IEF240I TIOT
>> Exceeded
>> message.
>> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=90368
>>
>
> Knowing the amou
Hi Ed
I agree with you. Hoping something better from IBM.
On Jun 22, 2016 9:41 AM, "Edward Gould" wrote:
> Jake:
>
> While I sympathize with your issue. I think a lot of vendor code might
> break at 64K. I vaguely remember discussing this with a vendor after
> setting it. Although I suspect the
Jake:
While I sympathize with your issue. I think a lot of vendor code might break
at 64K. I vaguely remember discussing this with a vendor after setting it.
Although I suspect the real “user” is DB2 and anyone with DB2 and some vendor
code would have run into this ages ago.
Ed
> On Jun 21, 20
Hi Lizette
Thank you for this.
Jake
On Jun 22, 2016 1:42 AM, "Lizette Koehler" wrote:
> After the discussion, I went ahead and put in a RFE for IEF240I TIOT
> Exceeded
> message.
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=90368
>
> Basically it is requesting IBM to e
On 6/21/2016 1:11 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
After the discussion, I went ahead and put in a RFE for IEF240I TIOT Exceeded
message.
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=90368
Knowing the amount probably won't help you resolve a concern, given the
64K hard limit
After the discussion, I went ahead and put in a RFE for IEF240I TIOT Exceeded
message.
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=90368
Basically it is requesting IBM to enhance the message to include
XK out of YK TIOT storage needed
Or
XK exceeds YK for TIOT storage
And
