January 2019 00:50
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ASCRE init module
I am thinking storage in a user sub-pool and saving the address in the
ACEE since we create that.
An ASCRE Initialization routine must not obtain storage in user-region
subpools because after the initialization routine
I am thinking storage in a user sub-pool and saving the address in the
ACEE since we create that.
An ASCRE Initialization routine must not obtain storage in user-region
subpools because after the initialization routine runs, the user region is
(re-)initialized.
Maybe you shouldn't be
That's one option.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
scott Ford
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 8:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ASCRE init module (again)
Like
Behalf
Of scott Ford
Sent: 10 January 2019 08:39
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ASCRE init module (again)
Like N/T and some storage for CBS in a subpool. .?
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 3:13 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Don't even think of using fields like CVTUSER and TCBUSER unless there is
&
Like N/T and some storage for CBS in a subpool. .?
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 3:13 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Don't even think of using fields like CVTUSER and TCBUSER unless there is
> some way to be sure that nobody else is or ever will be using them.
> BTDT,GTS.
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.)
Don't even think of using fields like CVTUSER and TCBUSER unless there is some
way to be sure that nobody else is or ever will be using them. BTDT,GTS.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on
I use Name Token Pairs for passing dataYou may want to consider using the Sub
System Interface (SSI) GET/PUT to anchor a control block in common.
-- Original Message --
From: Robin Atwood
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: ASCRE init module (again)
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019
