Re: Question about VSMLIST and LSQA

2017-08-02 Thread Don Poitras
The convention for the past 15 years or so has been first two letters of first name and first four letters of last name. So you'd probably be sts...@sas.com. For collisions, I think it goes to three and three, so possibly ste...@sas.com. You could always try to bribe somebody to be sas...@sas.com

Re: Question about VSMLIST and LSQA

2017-08-02 Thread Steve Smith
I asked the question based on the Auth. Ass. Services Guide... later on, I looked at the Diagnosis Ref., which says that the 230s are allocated in the 250s. Ah well, it was only idle curiosity anyway. If I got a job with SAS, would my email be s...@sas.com? Or sas...@sas.com? UGH. Better stay

Re: Question about VSMLIST and LSQA

2017-08-02 Thread Don Poitras
In article you wrote: > In sorting through the Rubik's Cube that is the subpool selection charts, > it appears to me that 233-235 are defined exactly the same as 253-255 > respectively. Is there some difference I'm missing? >

Re: Question about VSMLIST and LSQA

2017-08-02 Thread Steve Smith
In sorting through the Rubik's Cube that is the subpool selection charts, it appears to me that 233-235 are defined exactly the same as 253-255 respectively. Is there some difference I'm missing? sas -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe /

Re: Question about VSMLIST and LSQA

2017-08-02 Thread Peter Relson
>>A key reason for the last is so that someone can use LSQA for an SRB that >>is not associated with a TCB, for which you might not want private storage >>obtained by the SRB to be freed just because some task terminates. >Seems like a weak reason. Are there other ways SRBs are protected from

Re: Question about VSMLIST and LSQA

2017-08-01 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:52:15 -0400 Peter Relson wrote: :>>>Since LSQA is System Private Storage how come there isn't a TCB :>associated :>>>with it :>>Who said there isn't? :>VSM said so. Because VSMLIST is not examining the correct control blocks, As Jim Mulder stated, "

Re: Question about VSMLIST and LSQA

2017-07-31 Thread Peter Relson
>>Since LSQA is System Private Storage how come there isn't a TCB associated >>with it >Who said there isn't? VSM said so. LSQA, as shown in the subpool table in the books, has a variant that is associated with the current task, one that is associated with the jobstep task, and one that is

Re: Question about VSMLIST and LSQA

2017-07-31 Thread Jim Mulder
in Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Date: 07/31/2017 02:29 AM > Subject: Re: Question about VSMLIST and LSQA > Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> > > It appears that VSMLIST is documented as not returni

Re: Question about VSMLIST and LSQA

2017-07-30 Thread Binyamin Dissen
y, July 30, 2017 2:53 AM :>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU :>Subject: Re: Question about VSMLIST and LSQA :> :>On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 21:48:24 -0400 Joe Reichman <reichman...@gmail.com> :>wrote: :> :>:>Since LSQA is System Private Storage how come there isn't a TCB associ

Re: Question about VSMLIST and LSQA

2017-07-30 Thread Joe Reichman
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Question about VSMLIST and LSQA On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 21:48:24 -0400 Joe Reichman <reichman...@gmail.com> wrote: :>Since LSQA is System Private Storage how come there isn't a TCB associated :>with it Who said there isn't? -- Binyamin

Re: Question about VSMLIST and LSQA

2017-07-30 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 21:48:24 -0400 Joe Reichman wrote: :>Since LSQA is System Private Storage how come there isn't a TCB associated :>with it Who said there isn't? -- Binyamin Dissen http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software,