On 18/2/22 7:11 pm, Rony wrote:
As René mentioned already, ooRexx has full introspection. As ooRexx is
compatible with REXX (one can use ooRexx to run REXX programs that do not use
any of the new features of ooRexx) it is interesting how the Object REXX
developers at IBM handled that.
In
Hi Paul,
➜ test git:(master) ✗ cat stemcase.rexx
/* rexx */
A. = "Preset"
A.42 = "Answer"
B. = A. /* Behaves differently in ooRexx. */
DROP A.45
SAY SYMBOL( 'A.45' ) /* Behaves differently in ooRexx. */
➜ test git:(master) ✗ regina stemcase.rexx
LIT
➜ test git:(master) ✗ rexx
On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 12:11:57 +0100, Rony wrote:
>As René mentioned already, ooRexx has full introspection. As ooRexx is
>compatible with REXX (one can use ooRexx to run REXX programs that do not use
>any of the new features of ooRexx) it is interesting how the Object REXX
>developers at IBM
, February 17, 2022 10:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
Does REXX (any implementation other than the JVM) have introspection
capabilities? I suspect not as the only type is a string.
On 17/2/22 1:07 am, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote
] on behalf of
René Jansen [rene.vincent.jan...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2022 2:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
In Classic Rexx the main types are string and number. All Rexx has datatype().
It tells you if a string
As René mentioned already, ooRexx has full introspection. As ooRexx is
compatible with REXX (one can use ooRexx to run REXX programs that do not use
any of the new features of ooRexx) it is interesting how the Object REXX
developers at IBM handled that.
In 2007 I did some musings with
In Classic Rexx the main types are string and number. All Rexx has datatype().
It tells you if a string is Alphanumeric, Binary, Lower case, uppoer case,
mixed case, a number, a symbol (a vakid Rexx symbol, a whole number, or a hex
number.
NetRexx has the JVM’s introspection (reflection).
Does REXX (any implementation other than the JVM) have introspection
capabilities? I suspect not as the only type is a string.
On 17/2/22 1:07 am, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
Sent to both IBM-MAIN and TSO-REXX
Is there any available routine / function package that a z/OS TSO Rexx program
can
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 17:07:39 +, Farley, Peter x23353
wrote:
>Is there any available routine / function package that a z/OS TSO Rexx program
>can use like the oorexx function SysDumpVariables for debugging purposes?
>
>I have looked through the CBT File001 descriptions and looked at both
: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 17:42:50 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Perhaps, but oorexx uses that nomenclature, and OREXX is where
>SysDumpVariables came in.
>
However the OP is concerned with TSO Rexx.
>BTW, I tested and SYMBOL() returns VAR fo
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 17:42:50 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Perhaps, but oorexx uses that nomenclature, and OREXX is where
>SysDumpVariables came in.
>
However the OP is concerned with TSO Rexx.
>BTW, I tested and SYMBOL() returns VAR for dropped compound variables;
>
That is an incompatibility
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 17:15:22 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Whatever nomenclature you want to use, the defined behavior is that the
>compound variable has the same status is if it was dropped until you assign a
, 2022 9:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, at 02:44, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
It used to be that our actual email addresses showed in the listserv
headers, but I guess they are trying to protect our identities
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 17:15:22 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Whatever nomenclature you want to use, the defined behavior is that the
>compound variable has the same status is if it was dropped until you assign a
>value to it.
>
"Default" is so misleading that IBM developers have misunderstood
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Jeremy Nicoll [jn.ls.mfrm...@letterboxes.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2022 9:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, at 02:44, Farley
erv.ua.edu]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2022 12:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:11:30 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>IKJEFT01 is not vanilla batch, it is batch TSO, and ISPF works just dandy. You
>do n
On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 01:09:18 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>Not that I know of. REXX is a relic and doesn't have any introspection
>features.
>
PARSE SOURCE? SOURCELINE()? CONDITION()?
But generally I agree.
--
gil
--
For
Crayford [dcrayf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2022 12:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
Not that I know of. REXX is a relic and doesn't have any introspection
features.
On 17/2/22 1:07 am, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
> S
List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin [000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2022 10:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 14:34:55 +, Seymour J Metz
Not that I know of. REXX is a relic and doesn't have any introspection
features.
On 17/2/22 1:07 am, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
Sent to both IBM-MAIN and TSO-REXX
Is there any available routine / function package that a z/OS TSO Rexx program
can use like the oorexx function SysDumpVariables
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:11:30 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>IKJEFT01 is not vanilla batch, it is batch TSO, and ISPF works just dandy. You
>do need the right DD statements and PARM.
>
FSVO "right DD statements". But I've used it that way to use LMCOPY with
ISPF member ENQs.
My second choice,
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Joseph Reichman [reichman...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2022 10:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
Before I started running my
sion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2022 11:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
IKJEFT01 is not vanilla batch, it is batch TSO, and ISPF works just dandy. You
do need the right DD
of
Farley, Peter x23353 [031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 9:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
That sounds interesting, but if it is tied to ISPF I would much prefer
something
Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of W
Mainframe
Sent: 17 February 2022 01:39
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
ATTENTION: External Email – Be Suspicious of Attachments, Links and Requests
for Login Information.
Hey,Provide me your email
rexxtry.rex on WindowsNT
> say result
> 0
>
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
> Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 20
Thanks Willy, I will give that a try.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Willy Jensen
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2022 7:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
See the REXXVARS program
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 14:34:55 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>X.41 is not defined. All tails are dropped initially and when you assign a
>default value.
>
What's a "default value"? Are you inventing misleading terminology?
>
X.41 is defined by:
X. = "Preset"
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, at 02:44, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
> It used to be that our actual email addresses showed in the listserv
> headers, but I guess they are trying to protect our identities.
I can see some people's real email addresses in some posts here.
They're sometimes in ordinary
[000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 10:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 02:44:51 +, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
>That sounds interesting, but if it is tied to I
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin [000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 10:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging
[000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 10:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 21:36:48 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
X. = "Preset"
DROP X.42
Null = ''
X.Null = &quo
l Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Willy Jensen
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2022 06:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
See the REXXVARS program at https://harders-j
Depending on what you mean by 'dump' then the RLIST and REXPORT commands of the
REXXGBLV program also at https://harders-jensen.com might be useful.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
See the REXXVARS program at https://harders-jensen.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 21:36:48 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
X. = "Preset"
DROP X.42
Null = ''
X.Null = "Empty!"
call SysDumpVariables
Name=X., Value='Empty!'
Name=FOO, Value='123,456.78'
...
So it doesn't tell you that X.41 is defined but X.42 is undefined. Bummer.
How does it report
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 02:44:51 +, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
>That sounds interesting, but if it is tied to ISPF I would much prefer
>something that works in vanilla batch. My immediate need is batch Rexx
>executed from plain unadorned IKFEFT01, so TSO Rexx facilities are available
>but
essage-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Lionel B. Dyck
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 12:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
The only thing that comes to mind is the STEMEDIT from CBT File 895. It
doesn't
: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 8:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
Hey,Provide me your email and I will send a routine to list rexx variables. In
my routine you will be able to search variables current rexx pool showing the
result
12:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
The only thing that comes to mind is the STEMEDIT from CBT File 895. It
doesn't 'dump' the list but does allow viewing using ISPF.
Perhaps you could take that and adjust to do the 'dump'..
Li
Thanks Lionel, I will check that out.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Lionel B. Dyck
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 12:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
The only thing that comes
.rex on WindowsNT
say result
0
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 3:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all varia
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 17:50:32 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>It reports the compound variable but not the stem.
>
How does it report the DROPped member?
How does it report the member with the null string tail?
From: Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 12:30 PM
For complete
: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
On Feb 16, 2022, at 10:16:09, Lionel B. Dyck wrote:
>
> The only thing that comes to mind is the STEMEDIT from CBT File 895. It
> doesn't 'dump' the list but does allow viewing using ISPF.
>
> Perhaps you could take that and a
On Feb 16, 2022, at 10:16:09, Lionel B. Dyck wrote:
>
> The only thing that comes to mind is the STEMEDIT from CBT File 895. It
> doesn't 'dump' the list but does allow viewing using ISPF.
>
> Perhaps you could take that and adjust to do the 'dump'..
>
Need to add simple variables.
For
:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging?
Sent to both IBM-MAIN and TSO-REXX
Is there any available routine / function package that a z/OS TSO Rexx
program can use like the oorexx function SysDumpVariables for debugging
purposes?
I have looked thro
Sent to both IBM-MAIN and TSO-REXX
Is there any available routine / function package that a z/OS TSO Rexx program
can use like the oorexx function SysDumpVariables for debugging purposes?
I have looked through the CBT File001 descriptions and looked at both Mark
Zelden and Lionel Dyck's pages
47 matches
Mail list logo
