Regarding D XCF,COUPLE, you might try D XCF,COUPLE,TYPE=ALL if all you want to
see is the list of couple data sets.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with th
>What's this? Do my eyes deceive me? Barbara singing the praises of a health
>check - any
>health check? :-) (just kidding!!)
Well, must have been one of the few that I didn't delete. On the other hand,
one couldn't help but notice the D XCF,CPL output has become even larger on
1.12. Whe
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 07:12:59 -0500, Barbara Nitz wrote:
>>At the zOS 1.12 level, do we still have to calculate the spin failure
>>detection interval for EXSPATxx? If not, what is the current best practice?
>
>As far as I know, best practise is to take whatever default IBM currently
>takes. We rem
>At the zOS 1.12 level, do we still have to calculate the spin failure
>detection interval for EXSPATxx? If not, what is the current best practice?
As far as I know, best practise is to take whatever default IBM currently
takes. We removed exspat ages ago from all parmlibs and take the defaults.
At the zOS 1.12 level, do we still have to calculate the spin failure
detection interval for EXSPATxx? If not, what is the current best practice?
--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL
The Doctor: You know when grown-ups tell you everything's going to be
fine, and you think they're
