On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 12:16:37 +0200, R.S. wrote:
>I hate new names of PPRC and XRC (and PPRC-XD), but... But one should
>know there are new features. New features with new names, but no old
>name exist for them.
>
>There are still PPRC, XRC, PPRC-XD, but there is also some kind of "XRC
>without z/
anager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 3:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Two Processors and One IODF
CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL
, July 13, 2020 11:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Two Processors and One IODF
CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL
Ours is simply a DR site so currently we don’t have that requirement.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jesse 1 Robinson
wrote:
We mirror with XRC, which I believe is
am Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 3:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Two Processors an
; robin...@sce.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Michael Babcock
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 7:10 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: (External):Re: Two Processors and One IODF
>
> CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL
&g
day, July 13, 2020 12:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Two Processors and One IODF
[External Email. Exercise caution when clicking links or opening attachments.]
We mirror with XRC, which I believe is Global Mirror. (I cannot keep the
current lingo straight.) In my shop, we have a busine
ginal Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Michael Babcock
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 7:10 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: (External):Re: Two Processors and One IODF
>
> CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL
>
> Thanks!
>
> We are using Gl
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 12:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Two Processors and One IODF
[External Email. Exercise caution when clicking links or opening attachments.]
We mirror with XRC, which I believe is Global M
anager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Michael Babcock
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 7:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Two Processors and One IODF
CAUTION EXTE
Thanks!
We are using Global Mirror for replication. Not sure if using the same
device addresses will be a problem or not for GM.
So, does everyone recommend different device addresses?
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 1:01 PM Jackson, Rob
wrote:
> I don't know if anyone has pointed it out, but if this
W dniu 10.07.2020 o 20:19, Michael Babcock pisze:
We are in the process of bringing DR back in-house and have a new
z15-T02 in our new facility (our current "home" machine is a
z14-ZR1). I want to be able to manage both processors from a single
IODF. I'd like to have the same CHPIDs, CUs, and
I don't know if anyone has pointed it out, but if this is a brand new, vanilla
CEC, before you even have to worry about an IODF, you need an IOCDS. Generally
you create that deck from an IODF, and I can't imagine you would choose not to.
All of our CECs are defined in one IODF. For a new mach
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Two Processors and One IODF
CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL
To get the IODF across... what you'd need to do depends on who manages DR at
the other side:
if it's you, setup an email job on your primary system to email you the IOCP
when a new config is activated.
To get the IODF across... what you'd need to do depends on who manages DR at
the other side:
if it's you, setup an email job on your primary system to email you the IOCP
when a new config is activated.
If it's IBM or some such, setup an email job on your primary system to email
the vendor/partne
The trouble with using same CU and units at both sites is ... unnecessary risk
of varying/initializing a unit on the wrong side. Could be a major whoopsie.
Best to use a few ranges on this side, and a few ranges on the other, so it's
very easy to know what's where.
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message
Comments/opinions interspersed
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Michael Babcock
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 1:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Two Processors and One IODF
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: EXTERNAL EMAIL: Two Processors and One IODF
We are in the process of bringing DR back in-house and have a new
z15-T02 in our new facility (our current "home" machine is a z14-ZR1). I want
to be able to manage both processors from a single IODF. I'd
everything else.
Jerry Whitteridge
Manager Mainframe Systems & HP Non-Stop
Albertsons Companies
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Michael Babcock
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 11:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: EXTERNAL EMAIL: Two Processors
We are in the process of bringing DR back in-house and have a new
z15-T02 in our new facility (our current "home" machine is a z14-ZR1).
I want to be able to manage both processors from a single IODF. I'd
like to have the same CHPIDs, CUs, and Device addresses both at home and
in our DR machi
19 matches
Mail list logo