Rick,
Also take into account the type of person doing the design some ppl are
'part to whole' others are 'whole to part'.
Like John, I have been thinking about some tool, i work for a Identity
Management Software company, so my thoughts
are want is needed or wanted in RACF or ACF2 or Top-Secret
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Rick Troth wrote:
> Do a little googling on the license question. I can't think of any
> problems from going with the MIT license, but IANAL.
>
>
> On 03/28/16 10:25, John McKown wrote:
>
>> ...
>> Anyway, I'm still thinking of how it will be
Do a little googling on the license question. I can't think of any
problems from going with the MIT license, but IANAL.
On 03/28/16 10:25, John McKown wrote:
...
Anyway, I'm still thinking of how it will be designed. But I am curious if
the requirement of z/OS 2.1 would make it unusable to
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:38:10 -0500, Tom Marchant
wrote:
>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:25:03 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>
>>It will be
>>developed, probably slowly, on a friend's z/OS 2.2 system. The application
>>will use facilities which only exist on z/OS 2.1 and above.
>
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:25:03 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>It will be
>developed, probably slowly, on a friend's z/OS 2.2 system. The application
>will use facilities which only exist on z/OS 2.1 and above.
>I am curious if
>the requirement of z/OS 2.1 would make it unusable to a lot of people
I am seriously starting to think about a "learning" project. That is, this
will be done on my own time, not using company resources. It will be
developed, probably slowly, on a friend's z/OS 2.2 system. The application
will use facilities which only exist on z/OS 2.1 and above. In particular,
the