ianne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2023 5:43 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: separate SMPe environments
Another stupid SMPe question.
Currently, we have one CSI with one target and one dlib. (I inherited this). I
want to setup at least another target and dlib zones for a &q
On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 16:43:46 -0500, Bill Giannelli
wrote:
>Another stupid SMPe question.
>Currently, we have one CSI with one target and one dlib. (I inherited this). I
>want to setup at least another target and dlib zones for a "before"
>maintenance level.
>Might you ever consider creating a
e the volumes and my SMP/E
environment comes back automagically with the system.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2023 4:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] separate SMPe environments
Another s
Another stupid SMPe question.
Currently, we have one CSI with one target and one dlib. (I inherited this). I
want to setup at least another target and dlib zones for a "before" maintenance
level.
Might you ever consider creating a whole new csi for that or just as normal
have different zones und
We run with multiple maintenance levels, and clone to active environments as
required.
1. multiple GLOBAL zones - one per product subsystem, some for specific
vendors, and others as required.
2. each global zone has multiple target/dlib sets.
3. multiple maintenance target/dlib sets, with a uni
AM, Bill Giannelli wrote:
>> I want to setup separate SMPe environments, say 3 for different maintenance
>> levels. One matching production then 2 others for maintenance levels "coming
>> next". My question is, when I what to update my PROD environment with one of
>&g
On 6/11/2020 11:38 AM, Bill Giannelli wrote:
I want to setup separate SMPe environments, say 3 for different maintenance levels. One matching production
then 2 others for maintenance levels "coming next". My question is, when I what to update my PROD
environment with one of
ymour J.) Metz
>http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
>
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
>Bill Giannelli [billgianne...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 11:38 AM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Separate SMPe
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Allan Staller [allan.stal...@hcl.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 2:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Separate SMPe environments for maintenance levels
You still end up with a major syncing problem using e
://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Bill Giannelli [billgianne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 12:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Separate SMPe environments for maintenance
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Bill Giannelli [billgianne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 3:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Separate SMPe environments for maintenance levels
So this is for DB2 software. Distribution librarie
So this is for DB2 software. Distribution libraries are *.AD* Target libraries
are *.SD*. So I would create a second target zone a define datasets and DDDEFs
for say "*.target2.SD*" ?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archiv
ould like.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 11:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Separate SMPe environments for maintenance levels
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you tr
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 10:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Separate SMPe environments for maintenance levels
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email,
whic
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 11:40:47 -0500, Bill Giannelli wrote:
>So I've been reviewing the options you all have so kindly shares zonecopy,
>zonemerge, zoneexportand it seems obvious you need to be careful of the
>DDDEFs and renaming of datasets. If not careful you can really screw up and
>overla
f Of Bill Giannelli
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 9:41 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Separate SMPe environments for maintenance levels
>
> So I've been reviewing the options you all have so kindly shares zonecopy,
> zonemerge, zoneexportand it seems obvious
So I've been reviewing the options you all have so kindly shares zonecopy,
zonemerge, zoneexportand it seems obvious you need to be careful of the
DDDEFs and renaming of datasets. If not careful you can really screw up and
overlay one environment.
While simplistic and perhaps slightly more w
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Separate SMPe environments for maintenance levels
I do a similar process. One global zone for a z/os ver.rel, a "maintenance
zone", and then a target zone that matches every active SYSRES in my
environment. One DLIB zone.Maintenance is only actively appl
t Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids, MI
49546
616.653.8429 | fax: 616.653.2717
From: "Bill Giannelli"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 10:38:23 AM
Subject: Separate SMPe environments for maintenance levels
I want to setup separate SMPe envi
our J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Bill Giannelli [billgianne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 11:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Separate SMPe environ
11, 2020 10:38:23 AM
Subject: Separate SMPe environments for maintenance levels
I want to setup separate SMPe environments, say 3 for different maintenance
levels. One matching production then 2 others for maintenance levels "coming
next". My question is, when I what to update my PRO
SMP/e ZONECOPY, UCLIN (to fix the DDDEFs), DFSMSDss to COPY and RENAME
the Datasets
On 2020-06-11 11:38, Bill Giannelli wrote:
I want to setup separate SMPe environments, say 3 for different maintenance levels. One matching production
then 2 others for maintenance levels "coming next
I want to setup separate SMPe environments, say 3 for different maintenance
levels. One matching production then 2 others for maintenance levels "coming
next". My question is, when I what to update my PROD environment with one of
the other maintenance levels, do I need to go thru rece
23 matches
Mail list logo
