use axrwto.
ITschak
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
> What causes the AXR0500I message
>
> AXR0500I AXREXX OUTPUT DISPLAY 093
> EXECNAME=TESTX REQTOKEN=4000D29FAA504703A808
> TESTX running - output from SAY
>
> to be written to Syslog?
Could you point me to the REXX list?
Also, we have had a SORTSTEM function in VSE REXX for a LONG time. Does
z/OS not have SORTSTEM?
Tony Thigpen
Nims,Alva John (Al) wrote on 06/07/2017 01:27 PM:
This is getting to be like a discussion that was had on the REXX list recently,
as in it would
Using Catalist at _www.lsoft.com_ (http://www.lsoft.com)
Found these:
_rexxl...@listserv.uga.EDU_
(http://www.lsoft.com/scripts/wl.exe?SL1=REXXLIST=LISTSERV.UGA.EDU)
(https://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=REXXLIST)
REXX Programming discussion list (356 subscribers)
On 06/08/2017 11:45 AM, John McKown wrote:
This still seems to be supported in z/OS 2.2. Does anyone need to run a
program V=R in today's world? I'm just curious because this support seems
to be a "waste" of protect keys 10 through 15. Of course, if those keys
were "freed up", what could they be
I don't recall coding V=R for any address space, but when we first got into
internal DR via XRC between data centers around Y2K, we were forced to carve
out DR LPARs from existing production boxes. We would configure storage offline
from a large production LPAR in order to IPL DR LPARs in the
We have experienced a number of spool-full conditions in the recent past,
always caused by runaway batch jobs that produce tens of millions of lines of
garbage until the entire MAS grinds to a halt. So we're experimenting with
JES2-defined limits. In researching the options, we came across the
> On Jun 8, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
>
> [Default] On 8 Jun 2017 06:01:57 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
> edgould1...@comcast.net (Edward Gould) wrote:
>
>>> On Jun 7, 2017, at 7:06 PM, Phil Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> Lionel Dyck wrote:
And while we're plugging products, here's another one:
https://ibm.biz/CDPzInfo
Timothy Sipples
IT Architect Executive, Industry Solutions, IBM z Systems, AP/GCG/MEA
E-Mail:
STGPROT in the CICS SIT, telling CICS that various Dynamic Storage Areas should
be allocated in CICS or user key storage. Also dependent parameters TRANISO,
RENTPGM, TCTUAKEY, CWAKEY.
I think storage protection came in around CICS/ESA 3.3 (early 90's).
Ant.
-Original Message-
From:
> My first question is where does LE place the HEAP ( what Subpool ) ?
And my initial response is a question: why would you care what subpool?
The subpool is almost certainly not a programming interface. You should
not write any code that depends on the subpool
Any presentation that describes
May I suggest once again that you use
the quicksort Routine that I posted
Yesterday, using pure REXX?
you will see that it is very fast.
but: you have to use the
non recursive Variant, because
Most REXX Implementations
will be Limited on the number
of call Levels
Kind regards
Bernd
---
To join the REXX list
TSO REXXhttp://www2.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?TSO-REXX
Or there is the REXX-LA group as well
http://rexxla.org/
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
> Sent:
JZOS is great but here's a IVP job using OSHELL I run to exercise the
HelloWorld program supplied in the java bin directory.
To write your own no doubt there's a source example out there that you can
compile (javac) and run.
//TSO EXEC PGM=IKJEFT1B,DYNAMNBR=50,REGION=0M
//SYSPROC DD
ITYM "veddy well done". That's the British version!
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Edward Finnell <
000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Superb. Velly well done.
>
>
> In a message dated 6/7/2017 8:35:26 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> dbo...@sinenomine.net writes:
>
>
Thanks!
Really appreciate all the earlier advice (which could certainly come in handy
down the road) but frankly this is more what I was looking for today.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ken Smith
Sent:
> On Jun 7, 2017, at 7:06 PM, Phil Smith wrote:
>
> Lionel Dyck wrote:
>> If I recall the CMS/TSO Pipes is effectively the same code that is
>> reassembled for z/VM or z/OS. Sadly it is a product that is charged for on
>> z/OS but is included in z/VM at no charge. It should,
Tom Conley wrote:
>zMan wrote:
>> Hey, what happened to Ted? He could be a PITA but he contributed value, too.
>> Haven't seen him here lately.
>Knowing Ted, he's probably still "too busy driving to stop for gas" ;-)
Perhaps ran out of 'gas' for good?
Reminds me of John Chase, his last post
No, z/OS REXX does not have a SORTSTEM function built-in. I currently have a
STEMSORT function, but it is from a 3rd party vendor.
Al Nims
Systems Admin/Programmer 3
UFIT
Universtiy of Florida
(352) 273-1298
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hi
Is there anybody in the group who have used syncsort with Splunk ?
My understanding about Splunk is that it is just a log analuzer. Apart from
this what are the other benefits that other monitoring products do not
provide ?
Can someone shed your experience on the above.
This is purely for
I think Paul's use of BPXBATCH is clearer. Moving the logic to a
separate DD I think makes it even better. e.g.
//BPXBAT EXEC PGM=BPXBATCH,PARMDD=PARMINDD
//STDINDD DUMMY
//STDOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//STDERR DD SYSOUT=*
Thanks, but I don't see how this relates to my questions.
Tony H.
On 8 June 2017 at 02:59, IronSphere by SecuriTeam Software <
imugz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> use axrwto.
>
> ITschak
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
>
> > What causes the AXR0500I message
This still seems to be supported in z/OS 2.2. Does anyone need to run a
program V=R in today's world? I'm just curious because this support seems
to be a "waste" of protect keys 10 through 15. Of course, if those keys
were "freed up", what could they be used for?
--
Prof: So the American
> On Jun 8, 2017, at 7:49 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
> SNIP———
Peter, good answer.
This reminds me a little of something long long ago. Maybe someone here can
refresh (correct?) my memory.
From the time CICS came out the sysprogs were always
Thanks for chiming in Tom.
Using a COBOL "stub" as a top-level main program would certainly be simpler
from a structural standpoint, but because we are an old and quite large shop
there are many dozens (in some cases hundreds) of JCL's that would have to be
changed to invoke the stub routine
Using the (init _subr_dp) call to CEEPIPI instead of the (init_subr) call that
I originally used seems to have done the trick. In my assembler main test
program I can now call an eCOBOL V4.1 subprogram using CEEPIPI and a VS COBOL
II subprogram using a simple CALL after a one-time call to
On Jun 8, 2017, at 11:03 AM, Jake Anderson
> wrote:
Is there anybody in the group who have used syncsort with Splunk ?
We forward our OPERLOG to Splunk, although we don’t use Syncsort’s forwarder.
(I wrote my own; it wasn’t that hard.)
[Default] On 8 Jun 2017 06:01:57 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
edgould1...@comcast.net (Edward Gould) wrote:
>> On Jun 7, 2017, at 7:06 PM, Phil Smith wrote:
>>
>> Lionel Dyck wrote:
>>> If I recall the CMS/TSO Pipes is effectively the same code that is
>>> reassembled for
Biased Product Plug by the Product Architect
Syncsort's Ironstream product is designed to supply realtime data from z/OS
systems to a Splunk repository.
Data can include SYSLOG, SMF records, RMF data, SYSPRINT from the JES spool,
system performance data, Log4j files, Flat files and data
Agree, I'd forgotten BPXBATCH STDOUT and ERR can now can be sent to
SYSOUT. Wasn't so many years ago when I used OSHELL.
Ken
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Don Poitras wrote:
> I think Paul's use of BPXBATCH is clearer. Moving the logic to a
> separate DD I think makes it
Just averted a near disaster, a mid-day IPL of 4 LPARs, with a STC filling
up the spool with 10B bytes of data because the ESTBYTE limit was not
turned on for termination, OPT=1.
But would it have done anything anyway for a STC or does it just apply to
batch and APPC.
The manual is silently
Syncsort Ironstream and the Splunk free edition fully support the unique fault
analysis data from Compuware Abend-Aid and Application Audit for insight into
failures and application use or privledged users activity.
http://www.compuware.com/partners/syncsort.html
There are free Splunk Apps for
Peter,
We write software using COBOL and HLASM and I had a situation where subpool
0 had orphaned blocks of storage and our STC was apparently in control.
I found out that a RMODE=24, AMODE=24 HLASM PGM doing disk I/O and called
by a STC has to do Freepool and after a close.
We were using RACF
The EST Byte, Line, Page can be dynamically changed.
The simplest way to avoid an IPL (and JES2 just stops when spool is full - but
will respond to commands like PURGE)
Is to cycle the STC, add another spool volume, or see what is really going on.
If the STC is filling up spool, it needs to
33 matches
Mail list logo