Re: Address for ISPF-L

K3wl3r as in glitzier, less functional and more user hostile? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Thursday,

GIMAPI using Rexx

Has Anyone here tried this in Rexx? There is no formal way of doing that, but in a limited functionality - it works. The Version call work just fine. I tried the QUERY call and I can see that input is validated, and if wrong returns the RC, CC and error msg in the message buffer. This means that

Re: GIMAPI using Rexx

On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 22:05:07 +0300, ITschak Mugzach wrote: >Has Anyone here tried this in Rexx? There is no formal way of doing that, >but in a limited functionality - it works. > >The Version call work just fine. I tried the QUERY call and I can see that >input is validated, and if wrong returns

Re: Zowe for systems programmer ?

I agree "better" should be the way. Disp=old is not the way. Either propagate ispf edit enque or offer some sort of EASY extensible option to add something like git to handle member changes. Rob On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 7:53 AM Jerry Callen wrote: > Andrew Rowley wrote: > > On 31/08/2018 3:05

Re: z/OS network Speedtest

PM61951? Also check TCP***BFRSIZE values. Defaults are 64K Allowed 256K (or more, I haven’t checked). There is an old II* apar that discusses this. I was unable to locate it. HTH, -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Pace Sent: Friday, August 31,

minizip ?

Does anyone have an ISPF dialog or REXX front-end for the z/OS version of minizip (cbt file 865) ? -- Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor) < Mainframe Systems Programmer - RavenTek Solution Partners

Re: z/OS network Speedtest

Mark, You keep saying G as in Gigabit speeds, but are you sure you don’t mean M as in Megabit speeds? Unless you have really good 5Gigabit upload service from your house...That said I'm going to assume you mean 100Mb connection, that’s not real fasthow much data are you talking about?

NYTimes.com: E.U. Will Let Countries Decide Whether to Use Daylight Saving

>From The New York Times: E.U. Will Let Countries Decide Whether to Use Daylight Saving Some countries have lobbied to end the requirement that all 28 member states spring forward and fall back each year. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/31/world/europe/eu-daylight-saving.html

Re: z/OS network Speedtest

You are only going to transmit within the confines of your slowest network segment and any processor/WLM or I/O delays. Over the years there I have experienced a number of weird things that can dramatically affect ftp. I am sure that others can chime in. Tracking this down is going to take some

Re: Zowe for systems programmer ?

Andrew Rowley wrote: On 31/08/2018 3:05 AM, Jerry Callen wrote: > Everyone has to follow the convention, and on z/OS they LARGELY do. (Emphasis added) I rest my case. :-) > Source control is not a better solution, it is a solution > to a slightly different

Re: z/OS network Speedtest

We have a customer that has to send us a large amount of data. They claim that our ftp server is very slow. I have had our network people tell me that we have 100GB pipe to our ftp server and if they say it's slow it is most likely their upload speed. I have tested the upload speed to our ftp

Re: Incremental volume and dataset backups

Second that on FDR/ABR/CPK. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pew, Curtis G Sent: Friday, August 31, 2018 12:47 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Incremental volume and dataset backups [External Email] On Aug 31, 2018, at 11:34 AM, IBM user

Re: Encryption keys and EM waves

Are the specific results of the various tests a available to review? I honestly haven't given the test results much thought other than the CEX cards were certified. The barrier to entry for hacking a cell phone is pretty low from an acquisition standpoint. Getting a mainframe with a CEX card is

Re: Incremental volume and dataset backups

On Aug 31, 2018, at 11:34 AM, IBM user wrote: > > Is there a better 3rd party backup package you can recommend? I can’t say that it’s better since I’ve never used ADRDSSU, but we use FDRABR and we’re very happy with it. -- Pew, Curtis G curtis@austin.utexas.edu ITS

Re: Encryption keys and EM waves

For things like FIPS 140, IBM does its own testing before we send anything to the independent lab for them to test. Then, the lab does their own testing for the formal certification. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Incremental volume and dataset backups

Hi IBM-MAIN list, What can you recommend for incremental backups for volumes with strictly non-DB2 datasets (VSAM and non-VSAM)? I know ADRDSSU supports this. If you use ADRDSSU, how do you manage the rotation of the backups? Is there a better 3rd party backup package you can recommend?