I'm trying to fill in some details in the wiki article on S/370, and I'd like
links for announcement letters of GI manuals for the initial releases of
BTAM/SP
DFP (XA)
DFP (ESA)
GAM/SP
MVS/SP V2
MVS/SP V3
TSO/E (XA)
TSO/E (ESA)
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.)
CCSID would determine which characters were treated as valid. I would not
expect IDCAMS to second guess the user's InfoPrint parameters.
Ideally there should be a common print validation service and every utility
would have a parameter to pass it.
As long as the utilities attempt to redact
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 23:40:52 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>I might believe lost in the world of 3211; the 3211 is older than IDCAMS.
>Shirley it's time to add a CCSID operand.
>
What would CCSID do? What implementation do you envision?
Would it interface to InfoPrint? Shouldn't every utility
I might believe lost in the world of 3211; the 3211 is older than IDCAMS.
Shirley it's time to add a CCSID operand.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 23:34:50 +0200, Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
>Silly question - can one force IDCAMS PRINT to show printable lower case
>characters?
>
GRAPHICS (CHAIN(TN))/*COMMENT*/ -
Who woulda thunk it.
How come in this 21st Century this isn't the default? I suppose a data
check caused an
Yes, you have to switch to a print train which has lower case (since IDCAMS
is lost in the world of 1403).
PARM GRAPHICS(CHAIN(SN)) as your first IDCAM statement will switch to
printing lower case instead of periods.
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 8:35 AM Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
> Silly question - can
Silly question - can one force IDCAMS PRINT to show printable lower case
characters?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the
First off, thank you to all that responded to this inquiry.
Some additional information:
On our systems that are still running on the z/14 processor, the triplets,
Offset, Length, and Count are all present in the SMF type 30 record.
The products in question are using the unauthorized method
Yeah, boy, I did that once. I was compiling my COBOL code, and chafed yet
again at how sloppy the JCL proc was. I decided to make my own version,
decently aligned and all the DD names in a conceptually logical order. In the
process I fixed a few things; for example, I allowed the JCL to
No URL for the manual, but I got the following on a z/OS 2.4 system:
1 J E S 2 J O B L O G -- S Y S T E M ? ? ?
-- N O D E N 1
0
10.09.36 JOB02763 SATURDAY, 12 DEC 2020
10.09.36 JOB02763 IRR010I USERID !! IS ASSIGNED TO THIS JOB.
10.09.36
Sure 'nuff.
2 //NOTARY.SOJACK EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
IEF142I SOJACK - STEP WAS EXECUTED - COND CODE
IEF373I STEP/SOJACK /START 2020347.1012
IEF032I STEP/SOJACK /STOP 2020347.1012
And no,
Dear All,
Thank you for your response.Problem has been resolved by using below code
If Strip(comp_vol) = TOvolume Then
Do
"MVS R "MsgID",NO"
End
Really sorry for delay in response as i was not well so couldnt able to
reply you on time.
Thank you once again.
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 8:19 AM
12 matches
Mail list logo
